Carl Youngblood said the following on 01/25/2011 05:01 PM:
to respond to Anton's previous comments, firebug shows that nearly all
the delay is spent waiting for the server.
Of course it is, but that isn't what I meant.
You have a lot of images of your page.
You have javascript and CSS.
You
On 23 Jan 2011, at 19:04, Carl Youngblood wrote:
Hello, we're running a Radiant installation and we're experiencing
very slow load times. Here's our site:
http://transfigurism.org
We're running it on a linode 512 vm. The site uses the
radiant_rss_reader extension to construct many
Thanks a lot for taking the time to respond, Will. I have commented out
those lines and restarted Apache, but I'm still experiencing the same exact
thing. I have confirmed that the ruby processes I see spiking in htop are
new ones, so I'm certain that my changes are being read.
Thanks,
Carl
On
Thanks for the advice Anton. Pages are coming up fast when they are accessed
with a referer header and when they have recently been generated by Radiant.
But they are taking 30s when I type the URL in directly and when I click
refresh in a browser. All this 30s is spent by Radiant generating the
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:50 PM, William Ross w...@spanner.org wrote:
From a brief look it seems that the rss-reader extension disables all page
caching. It does this in a rather inadvisable way (by amending the Page
class itself rather than defining a specialist subclass) but since your site