Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Jim Gay
I'm sorry everybody, this is an error with the gem, not with Ruby 1.9.2. I'll fix this and get an RC out tonight, but here's where the problem is: I've changed the way the files are loaded in the gemspec to collect everything with ruby and ignore what's specified in .gitignore On this line: https

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Marshal Linfoot
Same thing happening to me. Ruby 1.8.7 (2010-08-16 patchlevel 302), so not a 1.9.2 problem. On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Wes Gamble wrote: > Are we supposed to be able to install a Radiant app. with Radiant as a > gem with 1.0.0.rc1? > > Here's what happens when I try: > > $ radiant -d sqli

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Wes Gamble
Are we supposed to be able to install a Radiant app. with Radiant as a gem with 1.0.0.rc1? Here's what happens when I try: $ radiant -d sqlite3 konditioning NOTE: SourceIndex.new(hash) is deprecated; From /Users/weyus/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/radiant-1.0.0.rc1/vendor/rails/railties/lib/r

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Joel Oliveira
At this point I'm apt to agree with Andrew on this. I think the 1.9.2 compatibility should be left to the rails 3.0 branch. I don't think its as much with regards to core as it is the entire existing extension ecosystem. (say that 10 times fast) - J On May 26, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Andrew vonderL

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Wes Gamble
I'm getting this - I can't even install Rails 2.3.11 because of: /Users/weyus/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package/tar_input.rb:117:in `initialize': no metadata found in /Users/weyus/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/cache/activesupport-2.3.11.gem (Gem::Package::Format

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Andrew vonderLuft
There are compatibility issues with ruby 1.9.2 I believe Jim's intention is not to try to address them all now in the 1.0 / Rails 2.3 release, but later in 2.0 / Rails 3 release. Andrew On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, john wrote: > i'm not jim but i was getting some errors with 1.9.2. might ha

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread john
i'm not jim but i was getting some errors with 1.9.2. might have been some extension or might have been in core. i didn't have time just then to track it down but please do try it with 1.9.2 and file issues with anything you find breaking.

Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-26 Thread Wes Gamble
Jim, Any pros/cons re: using Ruby 1.9.2 for this? Thanks, Wes On 5/24/11 12:35 PM, Jim Gay wrote: We've recently released the RC1 for Radiant 1.0 There are details about it here http://radiantcms.org/blog/archives/2011/05/24/radiant-1-0-0-release-candidate-1/ But if you want to jump in and tr

[Radiant] Radiant 1.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-05-24 Thread Jim Gay
We've recently released the RC1 for Radiant 1.0 There are details about it here http://radiantcms.org/blog/archives/2011/05/24/radiant-1-0-0-release-candidate-1/ But if you want to jump in and try it out, just "gem install radiant --pre" Please help us polish up this final Rails 2 version and rep