Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 3) - Gallery

2013-01-10 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Hi All, If you're at the edge of your seat wondering how this is going, I'll just do a quick update. On 7/1/2013 10:14 AM, Mohit Sindhwani wrote: So far, I have * changed the implementation of make_tmpname * changed code within the mini_magick processor for deprecation * changed code within

[Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 3) - Gallery

2013-01-06 Thread john
i don't think attachment_fu was ever updated to be fully compatible with ruby 1.9.x...see https://github.com/technoweenie/attachment_fu/issues/25 for this specific issue On Sunday, January 6, 2013 10:40:06 AM UTC-6, Mohit Sindhwani wrote: Hello! I'm continuing on with my explorations of a

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 3) - Gallery

2013-01-06 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Hi John, Thanks for the reply! On 7/1/2013 7:28 AM, john wrote: i don't think attachment_fu was ever updated to be fully compatible with ruby 1.9.x...see https://github.com/technoweenie/attachment_fu/issues/25 for this specific issue I have been to that page a few times, and have tried a

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 2)

2013-01-02 Thread john
the latest comments gem ought to work On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:51:35 AM UTC-6, Mohit Sindhwani wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the note. On 1/1/2013 4:29 AM, Jim Gay wrote: Thanks for reporting all this. I'm planning to push breaking changes into the master branch soon, so

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 2)

2013-01-02 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Thanks, John. I was trying that out just as you wrote, and it seems to work fine off the gem. On 2/1/2013 10:45 PM, john wrote: the latest comments gem ought to work I've got code_ray also working now, and am in the process of getting gallery to work.

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 2)

2013-01-01 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Hi Jim, Thanks for the note. On 1/1/2013 4:29 AM, Jim Gay wrote: Thanks for reporting all this. I'm planning to push breaking changes into the master branch soon, so tracking these things will be really helpful. Please do report any bugs you find on the github issues I will do so! I've made

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 2)

2012-12-31 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
First up, Happy New Year all :) I've been continuing with trying to update to Radiant 1.1.0 in an attempt to catch up with the times. So far, from what I see, some of the extensions I needed are already included in 1.1.0 as default. I think Aggregation and Clipped are already baked in. I

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles (Part 2)

2012-12-31 Thread Jim Gay
Mohit, Thanks for reporting all this. I'm planning to push breaking changes into the master branch soon, so tracking these things will be really helpful. Please do report any bugs you find on the github issues -Jim On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Mohit Sindhwani t...@onghu.com wrote: As

[Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles

2012-12-27 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Hi Drew, On 27/12/2012 10:07 PM, Drew Prescott wrote: it worked!!! thank you!! Happy to help! Cheers, Mohit.

[Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles

2012-12-26 Thread Drew Prescott
I'm very very new - I swhitched the rake and it did not work yet. But again, I'm new, so it's problably user error on my part. Thanks! On Friday, December 21, 2012 4:28:04 AM UTC-6, Mohit Sindhwani wrote: Hi Guys, It's the end of the year and so I thought I would update my sites that are

Re: [Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles

2012-12-24 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Hi Benny, Thanks for your help! On 22/12/2012 1:12 AM, Benny Degezelle wrote: About rake/gempackagetask; you should pin rake to = 10.0.2 I don't know if it's preferred (not much of a sysadmin guy), but I run my instances on nginx + passenger. I managed to get this working by adding the rake

[Radiant] Re: Radiant 1.1.0 Hurdles

2012-12-21 Thread Benny Degezelle
Hi Mohit, About rake/gempackagetask; you should pin rake to = 10.0.2 I don't know if it's preferred (not much of a sysadmin guy), but I run my instances on nginx + passenger. Also beware about this bug in edge: https://github.com/radiant/radiant-snippets-extension/issues/2 You can get around