Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-30 Thread Paul van der Zwan
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mike McCauley" wrote: On Sep 29, 2:08pm, Paul van der Zwan wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accoun

Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
"Joshua M. Thompson" wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Mike McCauley wrote: There is no way (yet) to set the umask from within the Radiator config file. (is this a good idea, anyone?) I don't see any problems with it, only advantages. I know I'd like to be able to fiddle with the default

Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-29 Thread Joost Stegeman
I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are created with mode 666. Is there a way to set the mode on the logfiles other than wrapping radiator in a shell script and setting umask in that

Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-29 Thread Paul van der Zwan
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joost Stegeman wro te: I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are created with mode 666. Is there a way to set the mode on the logfiles other than wrapping

Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-29 Thread Mike McCauley
On Sep 29, 2:08pm, Paul van der Zwan wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are created with mode 666. Is there a way to set

Re: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles

1999-09-29 Thread Joshua M. Thompson
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Mike McCauley wrote: There is no way (yet) to set the umask from within the Radiator config file. (is this a good idea, anyone?) I don't see any problems with it, only advantages. I know I'd like to be able to fiddle with the default permission on my logs and such (what