Hi,
Ok. I have been configuring SMS devices for 3,5 years now and from customer
0. to customer ~40'000. And here is what I know about SMS devices and
bandwith management. (at the beginning there is some simple stuff).
Fist you can set default parameters that will be applied to all subscribers
and
Thank you all for the help!!
It strange to see that I spent 24h looking to the .cfg file without
realizing that the second part was missing!! Copy/Past problems!
Francisco Contreiras
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Contreiras
Sent: quarta-feira, 25 de Junho de 2003 17:18
To:
Hi List!
I've played around with IP-Addressassignement by RADIUS - I've used
Addressallocator SQL
The Environment is
Solaris 8
Perl 5.6.1
Perl DBI 1.21
DBD-Oracle-1.12 (Problem with java stuff solved by preloading the
libthread.so.1)
Radiator 2.19
Since
Hi,
We seem to have developed an issue along the way somewhere where simultaneous use
checking broke and is no longer being honoured. We use Radiator 3.6 in Emerald mode on
a Platypus backend. The system used to check the session database and rigidly enforce
the limits indicated in Platypus.
Hello Rainer ,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:05 pm, Huber, Rainer wrote:
Hi List!
I've played around with IP-Addressassignement by RADIUS - I've used
Addressallocator SQL
The Environment is
Solaris 8
Perl 5.6.1
Perl DBI 1.21
DBD-Oracle-1.12 (Problem with java stuff
Update:
We are running into the same problem on a machine where we are using the
primary ip address of the system for radiator. A user will dial in and our
equipment will run the radius request, at which I can see radius
authenticating the user in authlog, but the dialup equip isn't getting it
Hi there,
we found something strange after on production. can you help?
we have a ggsn pointing to two radiator A and B, their configuration are the
same.
1. we send the accounting packet to 4 accounting server(A1,A2,A3,A4),we only
need A1 reply. But if A2 or A3 dead, the ggsn will fail to B
Hello Joanne:
I was unsuccessful in getting PEAP to work with Radiator the first time
around. Can you please extend my evaluation for another month. I am
dedicating this week and next to configuring Radiator.
Peter Francis
- Original Message -
From: Joanne Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
We are evaluating radiator. It does not seem to supposrt L2TP as
advertized. Below is the debug output from a CISCO LNS. Can radiator
support this protocol or not? If so? How?
Jim Brown; BSCS; CCNA
IP Systems Engineer
Drake Software LTD
Franklin NC, 28734
828.349.5823
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are evaluating radiator. It does not seem to supposrt L2TP as
advertized. Below is the debug output from a CISCO LNS. Can radiator
support this protocol or not? If so? How?
Jim Brown; BSCS; CCNA
IP Systems Engineer
Drake Software LTD
Franklin NC, 28734
828.349.5823
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Hi Hugh
I just installed the radiator server over to my production
box which is a Solaris Server, when I send a access request from radpwtst I get
a response saying no response.
I looked at the logs and there is nothing there just the
banner message stating radiator was started and the
Ok well if the stored procedure is what is expecting a numeric rather than
char is there a way to tell Radiator to try to convert that field to a
number before it passes it? I would assume that I can't simply change the
database itself, and a lot of the Rodopi stored procedures are locked as
well.
Hello Tim,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 05:16 am, Tim Jung wrote:
Ok well if the stored procedure is what is expecting a numeric rather than
char is there a way to tell Radiator to try to convert that field to a
number before it passes it? I would assume that I can't simply change the
database
Hello Jaskaran -
I suspect your Radiator configuration is listening on different ports to where you are sending the requests from radpwtst (which defaults to 1645/1646).
To specify different ports, use the following parameters:
perl radpwtst -auth_port -acct_port -trace -user
Hello Jim -
We have many customers doing L2TP to a Cisco LNS.
I will need to see your Radiator configuration file (no secrets)
together with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening.
regards
Hugh
On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 02:37 Australia/Melbourne, Jim Brown wrote:
We are
Hello Brian -
If the machine running Radiator only has a single interface and a
single IP address, then the only reason that the NAS will not receive a
reply and send a retransmission must be due to packets being dropped on
the return path, either because of filters or firewalls or
Hello Matt -
As always I will need to see a copy of the configuration file together
with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 20:36 Australia/Melbourne, Matt Taylor
wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have developed an issue along the way
Hi Hugh,
Sorry for push so hard ,any update for this? We need to fix the accounting
proxy asap.
The current status is one radiator proxy to 4 accoutning server (A,B,C,D).
Now we only can see the accounting packet from proxy to A, no accounting
arrive to B, C, D. Herewith is the current auth
Hello Donald -
It is difficult to say what is happening without a complete
configuration file and an accompanying trace 4 debug.
I suspect what is happening here is you have not correctly configured
an AuthByPolicy to control the execution of the AuthBy clauses. In the
case you show below
Hi Hugh,
Looks great with my test machine, appreciate. Besides I cannot find much
information for ContinueAlways, will it got disadvantage when using it?
Actually I was using ContinueWhileAccept (Continue trying to authenticate as
long as it is Accepted), it should continue if it accept, but I
Hello Donald -
I am not sure what your configuration file is meant to do, but you
might consider using seperate Handlers for Authentication and
Accounting as you can then use different AuthByPolicy's for the two
cases.
# define Handlers for accounting and authentication
Handler Request-Type
21 matches
Mail list logo
