if the Perl version is less than 5.12
Thanks,
Heikki
With kind regards,
AKSI Automatisering bv
Adwim Kalfsterman
T - +31 (0)50 549 00 64
F - +31 (0)50 549 00 71
E - akalfster...@aksi.nl
W - www.aksi.nl
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RADIATOR] Re-2: Adding a user
On 04/17/2013 12:35 AM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatis wrote:
If you get it after 'Add', what are you using as 'Valid from' and 'Valid
to' values? A quick check shows Perl's timelocal will not accept dates
after Jan 2038 if the Perl version is less than 5.12
That makes sense. I had
Thanks, Adwim, however I was really talking about Vasco tokens using the native
Digipass protocol (as implemented in AuthBy SQLDIGIPASS). I realise that OATH
(HOTP/TOTP) would be another possible approach though.
Regards
roy
- Original Message -
From: Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI
On 05/12/2011 01:39 PM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatisering bv wrote:
Albert,
thanks for providing the screenshot and details.
Looks like the digipass ppms are not complete in this release. I will
send you a separate email with working files from a previous Radiator
version and we will see
On 05/11/2011 10:25 PM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatisering bv wrote:
Helo Adwim,
I've setup a new server, because I was testing it on a Windows Server 2008 R2
server and the authen-digipass.ppd ppm modules won't install on that platform.
Thanks for reporting this.
I've now setup a 32
Hmm maybe is problem in too new firmware in my units.
I tell Proxim technicians let they try also test latest firmware 2.3.1
on their
office when 2.2.2 have a working, I dont want to spend time by
trying old Proxim firmware, latest firmware should always work best,
its not my problem, I will wait
We are actually running the Avaya 2.2.4 code on our Proxim2000 APs..
Bret
Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hmm maybe is problem in too new firmware in my units.
I tell Proxim technicians let they try also test latest firmware 2.3.1
on their
office when 2.2.2 have a working, I dont want to spend time by
We have Proxim AP2000s working with PEAP in a limited area. It does
work with Radiator, it just a pain.
Bret
Mike McCauley wrote:
Helo Pavel,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:50 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Today I got answer from technicians from Proxim, they are using
in own office AP-2000 fw v.2.2.2
Helo Pavel,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:50 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Today I got answer from technicians from Proxim, they are using
in own office AP-2000 fw v.2.2.2 and 2.1.3 with EAP-PEAP without problems.
But are not using Radiator radius because is not RFC 2285/2866 compliant.
2285 is
Bret Jordan wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to get work wifi access point Orinoco/Proxim AP-2000 with
802.1x EAP/PEAP user auth by Radiator:
-
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to get work wifi access point Orinoco/Proxim
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying
Hugh,
I HAVE JUST FIXED THE PROBLEM
I AM STILL SENDING THIS EMAIL INCASE ANYONE ELSE RUNS INTO THE SAME PROBLEM
BELOW IS A FIX FOR THE PROBLEM
We are using Radius Interim Packets (Live Packets),
Looking through the logs I have found the problem why it was failing but it
still doesnt solve my
Hello Tony -
I think you may need to set up two Handlers, and extend the
RADSQLRADIUS table (or use two) so you have both authentication and
accounting targets. Then you will need to run a second instance of
Radiator on this same host to deal with the local authentication.
The configuration
Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id G6Y4DGD8; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:21:27 -0500
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Frank Danielson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Automatically Proxing of accouting/authen. by
HostSelect in clause
until timeout by requesting remote access client
- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nico de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Radiator on Windows 2000 AuthbyNT hangs
(addition)
Hello
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Radiator on Windows 2000 AuthbyNT hangs
(addition)
Hello Nico -
Thanks for sending the debug information.
It looks to me like the NAS is retrying the access requests because you
are not sending back any reply
Hello Nico -
Thanks for keeping us up to date with your testing.
It would be very helpful to see a copy of your configuration file (no
secrets), together with a more complete trace 4 debug showing what is
going on with multiple requests and responses.
You should use a packet sniffer to
Hi Hugh,
As always you have been a Hugh help :-)
BTW I was trying to customise the AcctSQLStatement and get the
Acct-Session-Time to be logged
in minutes rather than seconds. I have tried various ways of dividing the
Acct-Session-Time by 60 but
with no luck (e.g., %{Acct-Session-Time}/60 :-)
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: website access / ipass authentication
Hello Tunde -
I am afraid I can't help you with questions about service as I don't
use it.
I generally use the restartWrapper utility included in the goodies
directory.
regards
Hello Tunde -
I am afraid I can't help you with questions about service as I don't
use it.
I generally use the restartWrapper utility included in the goodies
directory.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 23:38 Australia/Melbourne, Ayotunde Itayemi
wrote:
Hi Hugh,
OK. I have
Hello Matthew -
I think you will find that MD5 is included in all recent versions of
Perl.
regards
Hugh
On Saturday, Jan 11, 2003, at 04:43 Australia/Melbourne, matthew de
Jongh wrote:
i am in the process of upgrading our backup radius server and i am
trying to install radiator on the
StatsLog clause. And if you want a tool to restart Radiator
automatically and let you know why it did so, you should use the
restartWrapper utility provided in the goodies directory for this
purpose. See the relevant sections of the Radiator 3.4 reference manual.
Another (very convenient)
Thanks.
BTW how can i run multi-copy of Radiator in the same machine.
Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/11/2002 09:58 AM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Steven -
You would specify different UDP port numbers for each instance of
Radiator.
regards
Hugh
On Wednesday, Nov 20, 2002, at 15:25 Australia/Melbourne,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
BTW how can i run multi-copy of Radiator in the same machine.
Hugh Irvine [EMAIL
VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Code 142
integer
VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Msg 143
string
- Original Message -
From: Karel van der Velden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:02 AM
Some additional tips which have been discussed before:
When upgrading from major versions (2.x to 3.x), it is best to do some
testing by installing it in a 'lab' system. Especially if the
revisions differ in the way they do things. We had an issue before
that affected the assignment of IP
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
AbdusSami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002
9:51 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (RADIATOR) Re: Upgrade
Procedure
Hello
, August 19, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -
By definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.
You should allocate such users static addresses instead.
regards
Hugh
NB: I am travelling this week, so there may be delays
Hi Hugh,
One, I assume the checkattribute ( Service-Type =
Framed-User,Time ="Al-2400",Simultaneous-Use = 1)
implies "always-on 24-7-365" access for the
user?
My aim is to allow clients with DSL access
(alwayson-24-7-365)to remain on without
radiatiorreclaiming the
IP address
Does anyone know how to set up clients, NAS etc to make the client use a DHCP server
at the ISP? Is it as simple as doing a normal DHCP configuration in the client, and
then set up your DHCP server? Or do you have to configure the NAS as well? Because
such a setup would allow the client to
Hello Tunde -
By definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.
You should allocate such users static addresses instead.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:10 PM, Ayotunde Itayemi wrote:
Hi Hugh,
One, I assume the checkattribute (
Hello Ingvar -
No I have never seen such a thing.
This is because the end client device must start a session (usually PPP)
*before* it can send TCP/UDP packets.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 11:41 PM, Ingvar Berg (EAB) wrote:
Does anyone know how to set up clients, NAS etc
Just thought that it would be A Nice Thing, if the NAS could act as a DHCP relay, and
leave it to the client and the DHCP server to do this the standard way. (A Nice Thing
usually exists already, and can be found, you just have to know where to search ;-).
/Ingvar
-Original Message-
s,
Tunde I.
- Original Message -
From:
Hugh Irvine
To: Ayotunde Itayemi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:48
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re:
DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -By
definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use
to help.
regards,
cl.
From: Ingvar Berg (EAB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:18:26 +0200
Just thought that it would be A Nice Thing, if the NAS could act as a DHCP
relay, and leave it to the client and the DHCP
(EAB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:18:26 +0200
Just thought that it would be A Nice Thing, if the NAS could act as a
DHCP relay, and leave it to the client and the DHCP server to do this
the standard way
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:48
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re:
DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -By definition a customer with a
permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.You should
allocate such users static addresses
instead.regardsHugh
: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:57
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Multiple
Calling-Station-Id
Hello Tunde -As always, the only way I can see what is
going on is by looking at the configuration file and the trace 4
debug.regardsHughOn Thursday, August 15, 2002, at
06:14 AM, Ayotunde Itayemi
Hello Hugh,
Lurking over this thread, I see that you define how to handle a partial ANI
number match:
For your first point, you could also use something like this:
Handler Client-Identifier = specialNAS, Calling-Station-Id =/^080[234]/
We have a similar situation here, but we need to
Hi Hugh,
Thanks for the replies. I noticed a curious thing
though I am not sure of exactly when it happened.
I changed one of the IP address pools defined in my
AddressAllocator SQL to the same name
asthe identifier for a NAS. Below is the
DYNAADDRESS clause I used for the Handler for the
Hello Claudio -
You cannot use regular expressions in SQL queries, but SQL itself is
designed with pattern matching capabilities.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 06:05 AM, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
Hello Hugh,
Lurking over this thread, I see that you define how to handle a
Hello Tunde -
As always, the only way I can see what is going on is by looking at the configuration file and the trace 4 debug.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 06:14 AM, Ayotunde Itayemi wrote:
Hi Hugh,
Thanks for the replies. I noticed a curious thing though I am not sure of
Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ayotunde Itayemi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Radiator and Windows Encryption
Hello Tunde -
I will let Mike deal with the first part of your message
Hello Tunde -
I will let Mike deal with the first part of your message.
For the second part, you will need to write a PostAuthHook to do what
you describe.
You will find some example hooks in the file goodies/hooks.txt.
regards
Hugh
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 03:34 AM, Ayotunde
Hello -
As I can't find you in our customer database, could you please send me the
name of the registered company that has purchased this copy of Radiator?
thanks
Hugh
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 09:42, X-Wildph wrote:
Hi All,
What do i need to do to make Radiator add some attributes to the
Hello Jeremy -
Many thanks for your contribution. Mike will look at it when he gets back
from his travels next week.
regards
Hugh
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 06:17, Jeremy Hinton wrote:
Well, after digging around, i figured why not just do the fix
myself. So without further ado, following is a
Dear Hugh,
The problem we are faced with is that the NAS we use does not use ports. It
sends the port type as 5 being virtual to the Radius. So all sessions by
any user gets stored in the database with having a port of 0 as such, when
the delete from RADONLINE where NASIDENTIFIER='%1' and
So will I be successful at having all 3 radius servers
auth out of the same DB? with start/stop packets
timebanking Or would proxying to a single radius
which does all auth againist the db be the best way to
go?
--- Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Doug -
You are correct -
Hello Doug -
Could you please tell me the name of the registered Radiator customer that
you are representing?
In answer to your question, you can use either approach you describe, however
I tend to prefer proxying the radius requests as it is much more lightweight
and easier to manage.
Hello Ray -
If the Cisco supports standard Radius authentication, together with the
Session-Timeout reply attribute, it is relatively easy to build a
configuration file for prepaid services (using an SQL database).
regards
Hugh
On Fri, 3 May 2002 17:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hello Steve -
No NAS-Port is not unique. Every NAS has a certain number of ports, and those
ports get reused constantly.
regards
Hugh
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:01, Steve Brown wrote:
My fault, spoke to soon. It appears that the Boardtown RadiusNT scripts
setup the calls table so NASPort is a
= 64000
Sincerely,
Leon Oosterwijk
ISDN-NET Inc.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Leon Oosterwijk; 'Frank Danielson'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Inc.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
-Original Message-
From: Leon Oosterwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:33 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Leon Oosterwijk
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Hugh,
I did use the example
: Thursday, 04 April, 2002 11:33
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Leon Oosterwijk
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Hugh,
I did use the example in the goodies. I had to make some changes. It's
good
to know that the hook get's evaled just once. The DynAddress thing seems
.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
-Original Message-
From: Ronan Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:04 PM
To: 'Leon Oosterwijk'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
You would use the PORTLIMIT
]'
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Instead of using fork and synchronous you should probably
look into doing the AuthBy DYNADDRESS in a PostReplyHook
which gets run after a reply from your remote radius server.
There are some examples of performing an AuthBy in a hook
03, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Leon Oosterwijk; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Instead of using fork and synchronous you should probably
look into doing the AuthBy DYNADDRESS in a PostReplyHook
which gets run after a reply from your remote radius server
If you want to block access for all users when that combination of
Calling-Station-Id and Called-Station-Id is used, why not do it in a
handler?
Handler Calling-Station-Id = /^555/, Called-Station-Id = /111/
AuthBy INTERNAL
AuthResult REJECT
: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Reject access from specific
Calling-Station-Id
If you want to block access for all users when that combination of
Calling-Station-Id and Called-Station-Id is used, why not do it in a
handler?
Handler Calling-Station-Id = /^555/, Called-Station-Id = /111/
AuthBy
Hello Chairath -
You will need to make the same change that you made to the Radiator
configuration file in the Radmin file called Radmin/Sql.pm. You will either
need to change the file in the Radmin distribution directory and re-install,
or you can change the file in the Perl hierarchy
Hello Utku -
You can use DBD::ODBC and a commercial ODBC driver, or you can use
DBD::ODBC-Proxy, or you can run a copy of Radiator on the MS box and proxy
the relevant radius packets directly to it.
This topic has been discussed on the list many times so check the archive
site and do a
Sam,
In your Radiator directory there is a directory called 'goodies', in there
you will find a file called 'ansiCreate.sql'.
If you run that in you Oracle database it will create the default tables for
Radiator.
Read it carefully first so you understand what it does.
Also download the
Hello Barry -
This is but one reason why most operators just use stop records and
calculate the start time by subtracting the Acct-Session-Time.
regards
Hugh
At 21:03 +1100 01/11/9, Barry Andersson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm intrigued as to how others handle the change to and from Dayligh
Yep,
You'll have to use the cisco-avpair (you should be able to find the exact
syntax to use in Radiator - I'm sure Hugh can help you with that). The
syntax for the cisco is as follows (we're using the AS5350, and this works
like a champ):
ip:dns-servers=20.1.20.21 20.1.20.23
ip:inacl#1=permit
Hello Paul -
You have to specify which AuthLog you want to use, FILE, SQL or SYSLOG.
#define AuthLog FILE
AuthLog FILE
.
/AuthLog
hth
Hugh
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 15:53, Paul Thorton wrote:
Hi,
As per previous email. I have attempted to use the AuthLog option
instead
Hugh:
The length of the CHECKATTR REPLYATTR is 400 characters. Find below some
information (Config, ReplyAttr Trace 4 Debug)
Config File:
Foreground
LogStdout
LogDir e:/radiator/radiator-2.18.2
DbDir e:/radiator/radiator-2.18.2
Trace 3
LogFile %L/logfile
AuthPort 1645
AcctPort
Hugh:
We have series of Netservers that assign specific range of IP to connecting
customers. We want to force compliance from within Radius. This means that
specifying in RADIUS what IP range the Netserver can assign to the customer.
'Tunde Ogedengbe
Linkserve Limited
22 Akin Adesola Street
Hello 'Tunde -
You usually do this by specifying a suitable Framed-IP-Netmask in the reply
attributes, but you will have to check with the vendor what is correct for a
Netserver.
Here is what usually works however:
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.254
regards
Hugh
On Thursday 06
Actually, I'd love to see the whole(?) API which is available to us in Hooks
documented in an appendix to the venerable "manual" :) A few are mentioned
throughout already, like get_attr(). But for most you have to look through
the source.
Dave
:O
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hackett
Hello Dave, Hello Simon -
I have copied this to Mike for his comments, however from my own experience
you are far better off reading the source in any case. Mike's programming
style and copious comments make this a real pleasure.
Simon -
My suggestion would also be to use a PostAuthHook,
Yeah, an "API" reference would make hook writing a lot easier.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Kitabjian, Dave
Sent: Thursday, 19 April 2001 2:20 AM
To: 'Simon Hackett'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AbdusSami -
On Sunday 25 February 2001 01:23, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
Dear Hugh,
As you suggested I had made changes to Authby clauses. From dos prompt when
I test by radpwtst it is successfully accepting the password. But by Dialup
it is saying password is not correct.
Please
Hello Iris -
It looks to me like your configuration file is doing multiple
AuthBy's and a later one is accepting the request. Could you send me
a copy of your configuration file please (no secrets)?
thanks
Hugh
At 15:10 -0600 01/2/22, Iris Silva wrote:
Hello Hugh, following your
Hello Hugh, following your instructions, I did the following:
- To create an account called kids with GID "kids"
- To create a default:
DEFAULT2Time = SuMoTu0600-1000, Auth-Type = System, Group = "kids", Prefix =
"P",
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Hello Samantha -
I think you may need Radiator 2.18 (now in beta testing) to do this,
unless you want to get into the code yourself. There have been some
discussions on the mailing list about doing more advanced logging,
and we have added additional capabilities to 2.18 in response to
these
PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:27 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AbdusSami -
At 18:07 +0300 01/2/18, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
Dear Hugh,
Please have a look on attached configuration file. Actually I am try
dialup is
"the connection was closed"...
Waiting for solution.
Regards
AbdusSami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:27 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RA
:48 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AdbusSami -
Thank you for sending the debug output, but it just demonstrates what
I pointed out in my previous mail, in that you are only sending back
to the NAS a Framed-IP-Address and Framed-IP-Netmask
Hello AbdusSami -
You do not make these changes on the NAS, you simply modify your
configuration file to add the reply attributes in your two AuthBy
clauses. Something like:
AddToReply Service-Type = Framed-User, \
Framed-Protocol = PPP, \
Dear Hugh,
Please have a look on attached configuration file. Actually I am trying to
use for assigning dynamic IP address pool. It is rejected the connection.
Could you please suggest me to solve this problem.
Regards
AbdusSami
dynam.cfg
Hello AbdusSami -
At 18:07 +0300 01/2/18, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
Dear Hugh,
Please have a look on attached configuration file. Actually I am trying to
use for assigning dynamic IP address pool. It is rejected the connection.
Could you please suggest me to solve this problem.
I cannot see
Hi Hugh,
I was running Radiator 2.16.1.
I upgraded to Radiator 2.17.1 and the problem have been stoped.
Thanks for the help!
[]'s
Felipe
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Irvine" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Felipe Salum" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 18,
Hi Hugh,
I was running Radiator 2.16.1.
I upgraded to Radiator 2.17.1 and the problem have been stoped.
Thanks for the help!
[]'s
Felipe
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Irvine" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Felipe Salum" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 18,
Dear Hugh,
I still couldn't get the Reject reason. I also did a trace 4 but couldn't
find the attribute. I have attached the part of the log, could you please
go through this and help me out. I want to trap the reason where it says
"Expiration date has passed" .
Mon Feb 19 10:13:27 2001:
Hello Samantha -
Have you put RejectHasReason in your Handler (or Realm) clause?
regards
Hugh
At 10:25 +0600 01/2/19, Samantha Naleendra Senaratna wrote:
Dear Hugh,
I still couldn't get the Reject reason. I also did a trace 4 but couldn't
find the attribute. I have attached the part of the
Hello Hugh,
Yes, I have ...here is part of my configuration file.
Handler User-Name=/^icz\d{5}/
RewriteUsername s/^([^@]+).*/$1/
AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileAccept
# Show any rejection reason to the end user
RejectHasReason
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Hugh Irvine
Hello Samantha -
At 13:21 +0600 01/2/16, Samantha Naleendra Senaratna wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote:
Dear Hugh,
I tried it, but I'm afraid there is no attribute called 'Reject-Reason'.
Could you help me on this please ASAP.
Sorry, the correct attribute is Reject-Message.
As
Hello Hugh,
Thank You for your answer.
Does this apply to Radiator 2.15 too??
I'm asking because I have 2.15 version.
Thank You in advance.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote:
Hello Iris -
At 11:32 -0600 01/2/15, Iris Silva wrote:
Hello Everybody...
I want to create a user group
Hello Iris -
At 8:24 -0600 01/2/16, Iris Silva wrote:
Hello Hugh,
Thank You for your answer.
Does this apply to Radiator 2.15 too??
I'm asking because I have 2.15 version.
Yes it is (check your manual).
And you should consider upgrading to the latest version.
regards
Hugh
--
NB: I am
Dear Hugh,
What I need to know is how I could extract the REJECT reason from the
reply packet passed to the PostAuthHook by default. Is there a method that
I could extract this ?
Regards,
Samantha
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote:
Hello Samantha -
At 12:39 +0600 01/2/14, Samantha
Hello Samantha -
At 9:01 +0600 01/2/16, Samantha Naleendra Senaratna wrote:
Dear Hugh,
What I need to know is how I could extract the REJECT reason from the
reply packet passed to the PostAuthHook by default. Is there a method that
I could extract this ?
You would use something like this:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote:
Dear Hugh,
I tried it, but I'm afraid there is no attribute called 'Reject-Reason'.
Could you help me on this please ASAP.
Best Regards,
Samantha
Hello Samantha -
At 9:01 +0600 01/2/16, Samantha Naleendra Senaratna wrote:
Dear Hugh,
What I
Hello Mark -
The next version of Radiator has lots more features to do this sort of thing.
It should be out in the next couple of weeks.
cheers
Hugh
At 9:49 +1300 01/2/15, Mark - Orcon Support wrote:
Just following up on this request -- I've been needing to do the same thing.
I couldn't
Hi people,
We are having trouble with stale records in our SessionDatabase.
The NAS is a Nortel Shasta that doesn't seem to have a reasonable means
of being queried about a particular Acct-Session-Id or Username/Framed-IP-
Address.
We started using Ping, but it seems to be
I am writing an authentication cgi. This cgi will authenticate people...
for example http://faa.foo.com/cgi-bin/auth.cgi?user=fredpassword=fred
It's a very bad practise to put authentication info to the URL. It gets
logged by the webserver itself and possibly by proxies.
You should use a form
Hello Lisa -
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Lisa Goulet wrote:
Hello again,
I have a question with regard to the following AuthSelect paragraph which I
took from the radmin.cfg example:
AuthSelect select PASS_WORD,STATICADDRESS, \
Hello Ricardo -
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Ricardo Sousa wrote:
Ricardo Sousa wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with my NAS'es that I really can't pinpoint.
The problem is that the Ciscos keep saying:
It seems that most of those problems had to do with my Session and
Accounting
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
