manny-
i would be available for a ride in the morning. how about across the
gg bridge to fred 's in sausalito for french toast then back in time
for the reading?
do you think i could get him to sign my homer? :)
On Jun 5, 10:54 pm, Manuel Acosta manueljohnaco...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Link proves
What a great idea! Unfortunately my son has Water Polo practice on Sunday
at that time, so I won't be able to make it to the reading.
René
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to
Thanks for the write-up on the low trail fork! I've had a Riv-trail
Quickbeam since 2004, and a low-trail Ross since 1999 (I didn't know it was
low-trail until about 2006), and find them both great-riding bikes. I would
describe the steering response opposite to yours, though - the Quickbeam
Realized while heading home on Sunday (and it was brought home by looking
at Jim's photos) that no one photographed the water crossings. The Rustic
Road we took in Wisconsin had four of 'em. No one crashed or got overly
wet, although we came close on one. Still, it's something you don't see
It's a shame that nobody captured the high drama of the water crossings on film
or pixels. I guess we'll have to go back there soon.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Awesome job. Your bike looks so much better and useful with higher
volume tires. Very Riv-ish indeed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Ha! DougP finally has come out of the low-trail closet! Thanks Rene
for your thoughtful review.
I too went low trail on my load carrying bike, in my case a Surly LHT
with a 72 degree head angle. Tom Matchak built a fork with 68mm of
rake compared to the original 45mm. That is nearly an inch of
http://www.parksconservancy.org/events/retail/meet-the-author-grant.html
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 10:24:39 PM UTC-7, grant wrote:
Hey Manny,
Send me a link or something to ... your source of info. My schedule
mentions something at the Park, but doesn't say any more---no time, no
agenda
I'm up for a ride after the reading.
Cheers,
Adam
On Jun 5, 9:34 pm, Manuel Acosta manueljohnaco...@hotmail.com wrote:
I hear by open up the table for the first annual (hopefully) Rivendell
Rally Bay Area Edition. I know it's kind of late but with school just
ending this was the last thing
The missing bits were the rear fender and the front wheel. I knocked both
those projects out last night. So, short of doing the tubeless thing, it's
done.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-sp3G3QsxIZc/T8-K-lFH8mI/Ais/9sa0VhokxG8/s1600/IMG_0856.JPG
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012
That's a fine-looking bike, Bill.
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of William
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:54 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: My 650B conversion progress
I had tried to attach a photo, but don't know if it worked. Here's a link
at any rate:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/45758191@N04/7345511078/in/photostream
Riv content:
Newbaums grey cloth tape
Hemp twine
Grip King Pedals
P45 plastic fenders
Sackville flaps F+R
Grant's target of 260mm being
Sounds good. I should be able to make it for a ride afterward, unless I'm
forgetting something that my better half will remind me of. I'm envisioning
some mixed terrain over the bridge, or maybe an urban explore in SF?
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 8:36:03 AM UTC-7, Adam wrote:
I'm up for a
Manny
My folks are coming into town, so I'm out. That said, I think you could do
a hiker/biker site at Samuel P Taylor Saturday night, since you are now a
pro at getting to and from there safely from the GG Bridge
Bill
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 9:34:10 PM UTC-7, Manuel Acosta wrote:
I hear
René,
Your experiment is remarkable. As a scientist I admire your desire to
experiment and learn, It also prompts me to write my first ever response to
the Group. I have lurked in the background vicariously enjoying passionate
debates about front bags vs rear bags, clips vs open petals, light
Beautiful!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/_mPfK2dPc20J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To
Greg J, you've described it perfectly. This is exactly my experience with
my low trail (Rawland) and my high trail Rivs. I like them all alot, both
with and without heavy front loads. I've never had a rear load on my low
trail bike so I can't compare that. They are decidedly different but
My parents are coming to visit this weekend, and my Pop has indicated that
he's got another batch of Grip King Supreme cages in the works. He's more
of a process engineer, so he's spending all his time on making tooling and
jigs so a monkey can make cages. Like I said before if we were paying
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 12:45:35 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
My parents are coming to visit this weekend, and my Pop has indicated that
he's got another batch of Grip King Supreme cages in the works. He's more
of a process engineer, so he's spending all his time on making tooling and
The middle area of the Grip King pedal has a slight dip to it, and feels
kinda empty. It doesn't bother me much, but when it came time to purchase
new pedals for other bikes a few weeks ago, I went back to RMX. I can see
why some would be happier with Grip Kings with the modification.
Joe
Need? Need? As the kids say: LMFAO!
Thank you for the opportunity to describe either
A. why these are needed so you buy neither them nor the Grip Kings, or
B. why these are not needed so you don't buy the cages
Seriously, though. The Grip Kings, in my opinion are the best platform
pedals
21 matches
Mail list logo
