[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-08 Thread Paul LZY
I ride a 56 cm Sam. It used to feel too heavy to be my go-fast, but then I sold my go-fast (run of the mill trek road bike), so my Sam has to do it all. I've got it with a schmidt dynohub, 7spd, all the usual Riv bits, including Marathon Extremes. I do ride with clipless ATACs though. I ride

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-05 Thread redsydude
I think those bikes are built by the same manufacturer in Taiwan so is the quality control on the Sam Hillborne much better than on the SOMA? On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:06:58 PM UTC-8, Tony Lockhart wrote: Thanks Aaron! I agree, the front brake caliper in the photo is out of

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-05 Thread Tony Lockhart
The build quality looks identical in both frames, however the paint job on the San Marcos is not as good as on the Hillborne. All of the lugs appear to be identical with the exception of the lower headtube lug on the SM---more windows and more decorative. On Wednesday, December 5, 2012

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-04 Thread Tony Lockhart
Thanks Aaron! I agree, the front brake caliper in the photo is out of tolerance--this is my primary gripe about the San Marcos. My 54cm SM uses a standard (47-57) reach caliper up front and a long reach (55-73) caliper at the back. I'm not sure if this is a design flaw or an operator error. For

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-04 Thread rcnute
Those are both such great looking setups. I'm saving that photo. Ryan On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:06:58 PM UTC-8, Tony Lockhart wrote: Thanks Aaron! I agree, the front brake caliper in the photo is out of tolerance--this is my primary gripe about the San Marcos. My 54cm SM uses a

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-03 Thread Peter Pesce
Agreed. But for me at least, go fast is purely a feel, as nothing with me aboard will be going fast by any objective measure! It's more about a lively and responsive quality that I don't think is purely related to weight or anything in particular. My Sam just never felt anything but stout,

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-03 Thread RJM
Thanks a bunch for the write up and pictures Tony, great info. On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:42:46 PM UTC-6, Tony Lockhart wrote: Ryan, I actually have both bikes and have some thoughts to share with you regarding both. Perhaps some of my experiences can help with your decision on which

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-03 Thread Aaron Thomas
Tony, Quick head's up on your brake reach issue. Looks like you're using the wrong brake up front — and that's why the brake pads are high in the slots. Only the 650B sizes of the San Marcos (i.e. 47, 51) use the long reach Tektro 559 (55-73mm). The 700c sizes use standard reach brakes (47-57

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread Jeremy Till
It should be pointed out that a whole lot more goes into making a bike a go fast than just the frame and fork. Roadeo's are fast because they are often built with fairly lightweight parts, especially wheels. If you end up going for for the San Marcos, especially in a smaller size like your, I

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread Brewster Fong
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:01:49 AM UTC-8, Jeremy Till wrote: It should be pointed out that a whole lot more goes into making a bike a go fast than just the frame and fork. Agree. How much lighter is a Roadeo than a SM? That difference basically disappears under the rider. Grant

Re: [RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread cyclotourist
Figure out which wheel size you want to commit to, and there's your answer. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Michael john11.2...@gmail.com wrote: Don't know how much visuals play into it for you, but the Marcos doesn't have that classic fork curve like the Rivendells do. Have you seen it? Very

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread RJM
Thanks for all the replies, One the go fast bike, I was planning on using brifters, probably something from Sram as I prefer their hood shape. I am not exactly light, about 200 and still a short dude so I do have some weight to get off me. Light weight really isn't a huge consideration on

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread Tony Lockhart
Ryan, I actually have both bikes and have some thoughts to share with you regarding both. Perhaps some of my experiences can help with your decision on which frame to purchase. I bought a Sam Hillborne a couple of years back and went through a number of drivetrain and accessory changes. It's

Re: [RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread PATRICK MOORE
RJM: don't appologize for Looks. They are, IMO, the best road pedals out there. I have older-model Look Keo Pluses or Maxes or whatever the intermediate level is, and I like them very much (a) for the large, comfortable platform and (b) for the secure lock in feeling that in no way implies a

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread William
If you want a really really nice and super affordable road frameset, consider the road frame from Black Mountain Cycles in Point Reyes Station. It's not as fancy as the Roadeo, but takes wider road tires like a Roadeo and/or takes fenders with medium sized road tires. It's an absolute steal

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-02 Thread Joe Bernard
130. On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:42:45 AM UTC-8, RJM wrote: Thanks for all the replies, One the go fast bike, I was planning on using brifters, probably something from Sram as I prefer their hood shape. I am not exactly light, about 200 and still a short dude so I do have some

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread Joe Bernard
I'm pretty sure the SOMA would be a good go-fast, but don't kid yourself: That Roadeo is the bee's knees, and you want it. Get an old Bridgestone RB-2 off Craigslist as a stop-gap while you save your pennies, then flip it when Roadeo time comes. Tis my thoughts, anyway. Joe Bernard Vallejo,

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread Mike
I'd be curious if you could set the San Marcos up with Grand Bois Hetres. Seems like it would make a nice go fast bike and you'd still have the benefit of clearance for bigger tires, fenders and even the ability to attach a rear rack. I say go for it. -- You received this message because you are

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread Big Paulie
I faced the same dilemma recently, and chose the San Marcos. Haven't had a moment's regret. Best handling bike I've ever ridden. And that includes a Ram and a AHH. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread dougP
Ryan: If you really lust after a Roadeo, the San Marcos may feel like a compromise. Only you can sort that one out. Since Grant designed them both, I expect the two would perform similarly if equipped with the same wheels, components, etc. The Roadeo has been out a couple of years now.

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread RJM
The WTB ad is a good idea, Doug. I might have to try that. I really like the blue color of the San Marcos, pretty nice shade of blue. On Saturday, December 1, 2012 7:12:11 PM UTC-6, dougP wrote: Ryan: If you really lust after a Roadeo, the San Marcos may feel like a compromise. Only

[RBW] Re: Go fast bike: San Marcos?

2012-12-01 Thread Michael
Don't know how much visuals play into it for you, but the Marcos doesn't have that classic fork curve like the Rivendells do. Have you seen it? Very modern looking. If you are only talking saving up another grand for the Roadeo, I would just wait and get what I really wanted. Let us