[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread nick . bike . bull
I love my Rambouillet, and I've never been unhappy with it because of its weight, but it is hardly a lightweight at 24-1/2 pounds for the bike itself (i.e., the basic bike with no add-ons like water bottles, luggage, fenders etc.) Similarly equipped, my Gunnar Sport with SS couplers weighs about

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread James Dinneen
, nick.bike.b...@gmail.com nick.bike.b...@gmail.com wrote: From: nick.bike.b...@gmail.com nick.bike.b...@gmail.com Subject: [RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy? To: RBW Owners Bunch rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 9:36 AM I love my Rambouillet, and I've

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread James Warren
Exactly. Tim's bike would give up a lot of good stuff just to be a couple of pounds lighter. Not worth it. -Original Message- From: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net Sent: May 10, 2009 8:15 AM I could readily get my 60 cm 1996 All-Rounder under 25 lbs and probably under 23, but the

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread PATRICK MOORE
A nice bike is a nice bike, but a * light* nice bike is a *very* nice bike. Amen. (Bet my 2007 Redline Monocog 29er, with fenders, 44 mm rims and 60 mm Big Apples -- 2 lb each!!!, discs, drops, Nelson, and VO bag support, weighs more than any of y'alls measly road rigs. It has a Honka Hoota,

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread nick . bike . bull
Nokian Extreme 296's in the winter. Man are those things hard to spin up! But they sure make you feel confident in the icy stuff. On May 10, 3:03 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote: A nice bike is a nice bike, but a * light* nice bike is a *very* nice bike. Amen.  (Bet my 2007

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread Bill M.
On May 10, 2:02 pm, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: I'd guess I could take at least 5 pounds off by just unbolting stuff,   but then the bike loses a lot of it's utility- as well as much of its   difference from my other bikes.  The point of having multiple bikes   IMHO is to have

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread CycloFiend
on 5/10/09 1:48 PM, nick.bike.b...@gmail.com replied to: what James Dinneen jfxdinn...@yahoo.com wrote: If you do decide to experiment with a single speed on the trek, you might want to start with a single speed, instead of a fixed gear. I found that it the downside of the hills that were

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-10 Thread nick . bike . bull
OK, where'd that fixie wheel go? And I wonder if one of the cogs off my '79 Shimano 600 cassette will work? On May 10, 8:41 pm, CycloFiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote: on 5/10/09 1:48 PM, nick.bike.b...@gmail.com replied to: what James Dinneen jfxdinn...@yahoo.com wrote: If you do

[RBW] Re: Who says Rivendells have to be heavy?

2009-05-09 Thread Jim Cloud
I don't generally worry much about my bike's weight, but I don't think my Riv (an original 65 cm Rivendell Road Standard purchased in 1996) is very light. The lightest bike I've owned (sold it last year) was a 64 cm Waterford W-13 built up with all Campy Super Record components. The W-13 weighed