Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote:
However, there doesn't seem to be a relationship designator for
'producer'; or rather, there is one, but it is assigned to: producer: A
person, family, or corporate body responsible for most of the business
aspects of a production for screen,
Hi, everyone;
Could we get some postings on what others are doing now with the GMD? There are
lots of opinions out there on this, I know.
Accepting but not displaying in OPAC?
Displaying? Etc.
Some rationales would be helpful too. My librarian thanks you!
Tarango, Adolfo atara...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Weighing in with trepidation to comment on the part of 2.8.1.3
addressing the appearance of publication data. Note, that 2.8.1.3 states a
condition must be met, that when *bo**th* publication data of the
reproducer and the original are found on the
Nonexistent data for an element such as Production Statement can still mean
there is a Production Statement.
There is also the method to record the subelements in a production statement or
publication statement if known or probable data cannot be determined. A related
manifestation element
Based on what our customers request, it depends on what the local system
requires. Some systems require a GMD (245$h)-- of these customers some ask that
we retain the 245$h, even if they are getting RDA conversion. Other customers
ask us to generate a GMD (245$h) if it does not exist and there
I cannot find that the current authority file. I assume it is a title
entry under 130
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Adger Williams awilli...@colgate.eduwrote:
I found Zhen'gao |K Selections |l English, as the uniform title/preferred
access point for a work that is a translation of the
Ditto for us,
Sally Carroll-Ricks, MLS, MM, AHIP
Technical Systems/E-Resources Librarian
Blumberg Memorial Library
http://bulldogs.tlu.edu/libraryhttp://www.tlu.edu/library
Subject Liaison for music, film, theater, dance, science and technology
(including health sciences and kinesiology)
We are also keeping the gmd. Patrons and staff both count on it for quick and
easy identifying of which record is desired.
It should be noted however, that we use non-standard gmds of our own
construction - dvd, cd, book on cd, compact disc, etc - so they are really more
like smds.
We have
FWIW, here's what we're doing, and our rationale... Don't know if it's good or
bad, or if it's for everyone...
At present we are retaining GMD's in AACR2, and adding GMD's to RDA. (Sorry,
but we are.)
Presently we're supporting two separate OPAC products, one of which is old and
has very
Although we catalog almost exclusively in RDA, we add GMD post-export to
non-book materials because the librarians want that information in the
short-line displays of the initial hit lists and our current-generation ILS
does not presently have the ability to generate functionally equivalent
Yes
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
I cannot find that the current authority file. I assume it is a title
entry under 130
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Adger Williams awilli...@colgate.eduwrote:
I found Zhen'gao |K Selections |l English, as the
Sorry. The AR in question is n 2013008942.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
I cannot find that the current authority file. I assume it is a title
entry under 130
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Adger Williams awilli...@colgate.eduwrote:
I found Zhen'gao
We are leaving a GMD if it is present (in both AACR2 and RDA records), but we
are not adding a GMD to an RDA record if one is not present. We are following
the principle of least work-it doesn't hurt our system right now if it is
present in an old RDA record, but we won't add it.
Is that title entry under field 130 different from the one represented by
LC NAR entered under field 100:
LCCN: n 2013008942
100 1_ Tao, Hongjing, |d 452-536. |t Zhen gao. |k Selections.
|l English
then?
===
I do hope that libraries that are using non-standard GMDs do not include them
in any records that they contribute to OCLC. If including GMDs in shared
records, they should be the valid ones from AACR2.
Adam Schiff
University of Washington Libraries
From: Kathleen Lamantia
Sent: Friday,
That would take of it, thanks Mark, I did say with trepidation. :)
Adolfo
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E.
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 8:40 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re:
That's similar to our situation.
Once we went with a system that used fixed field generated icons, the GMD was a
burden. The icon also produces an equivalent term that is appended to titles in
the Title Browse index, which means the last place the GMD had any value was
gone.
In the regular
Also getting into new territory for me, would the RDA Manuscript-related
elements (RDA 3.9.2) apply for a single cataloged print-out of a published
electronic resource?
Production Method for Manuscript: printout
Scratch that idea. Better to apply the basic RDA concept of choosing the right
Sorry, my fingers slipped.
The access point I am interested in is presented by this authority record.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Hideyuki Morimoto hm2...@columbia.eduwrote:
Is that title entry under field 130 different from the one represented by
LC NAR entered under field 100:
The knowledgeable Mark said:
Creator: Doe, Jane
Publisher: ABC Media (New York, N.Y.)
Owner: Smith, John
If the OPAC supplies Publisher as the label for 264 1, then
certainly the printer of a one off copy of the electronic resource
should *not* be coded 264 1. Publisher name and date are
Carolyn Phillips said:
I agree with Deborah that Great Lakes Video Services is the producer of
the reproduction, but the definition of the relationship designator
producer as I read it, does not apply.
You are correct there I think. We have introduced manufacturer as a
relationship
And now, with this announcement, there is a simple way to propose new
relationship designators, at least for PCC members:
The process for fast tracking PCC proposals for new and revised
relationship designators has been developed. A form is posted on the PCC
website
As our ILS does not display icons, my director has asked us to add the GMD to
RDA records. We do this with our local records only, not in records we
contribute to OCLC. For us, the GMD is valuable to both users and staff.
Sometime soon we hope to have the 33X fields enabled for display and
If the OPAC supplies Publisher as the label for 264 1, then
certainly the printer of a one off copy of the electronic resource
should *not* be coded 264 1. Publisher name and date are important
clues to the authority and currency of a resource.
True enough.
Who printed it
when is not
24 matches
Mail list logo
