I'm rather unsure about what the title and statement of responsibility
area should look like if there is both a formal name of the conference
and a specific title of a conference on the preferred source of information.
Let's consider the following example (which I've translated from German
to
I am not speaking for every American cataloger here, but we would have the
m.e as the conference since it is a named conference. A parallel to this
would be if you had the title followed by statement of responsibility with
a personal name and did not make the personal name the main entry or
Gene,
Thanks, but perhaps I didn't explain my problem clearly enough. It's not
about the main entry - I had indeed assumed that the conference would be
creator according to 19.2.1.1.1 d). My problem is about the
bibliographical description of such an item. Where does the name of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 05.08.2013 17:56, schrieb Heidrun Wiesenmüller:
---
100th CONFERENCE OF GERMAN LIBRARIANS
IN BERLIN 2011
LIBRARIES FOR THE FUTURE -
FUTURE FOR THE LIBRARIES
[this is printed slightly smaller than
Without seeing the actual item, I would place it in the area of resp.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
Gene,
Thanks, but perhaps I didn't explain my problem clearly enough. It's not
about the main entry - I had indeed assumed that
Gene,
Without seeing the actual item, I would place it in the area of resp.
Sorry, that was too much shorthand for a non-native speaker:
Does resp here mean the same as depends? If so, on what - the layout?
If you want to have a closer look, here's a scan of the title page:
I meant area of responsibility. The 245 line would read [title] / |c [name
of conference]
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
Gene,
Without seeing the actual item, I would place it in the area of resp.
Sorry, that was too much
Thanks, Gene. Now all is revealed (actually, I should have been able to
work that one out myself...)
I'm quite happy to hear that. German catalogers will have to get used to
so many new things; it's rather nice if some things stay the same.
Heidrun
On 05.08.2013 19:46, Gene Fieg wrote:
I
Based on the layout in the scan, I would have transcribed the 100. Deutscher
Bibliothekartag as the title proper, Bibliotheken fur die Zukunft as the other
title, and Herausgaben von Ulrich Hohoff etc as the statement of
responsibility. I would have provided variant access for the other
Ben,
your two cents are, as usual, worth a lot more than that ;-)
I hadn't realized that RDA has brought a change here. Now I understand
why I found so many cases of the conference name as other title
information in the catalogs.
Thanks also for pointing out the subtle difference in the
I meant, of course, Bibliotheken not Biblitheken.
--Ben
Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of
Heidrun posted:
100th CONFERENCE OF GERMAN LIBRARIANS
IN BERLIN 2011
LIBRARIES FOR THE FUTURE -
FUTURE FOR THE LIBRARIES
[this is printed slightly smaller than the name of the conference above,
but still in capitals]
edited by
Ulrich Hohoff and Daniela Luelfing
--
245 10
12 matches
Mail list logo
