Re: [RDA-L] Collective cities

2013-12-18 Thread James Weinheimer
On 17/12/2013 20.33, J. McRee Elrod wrote: I think we need to keep clear the distinction among: 1) A collective title on the manifestation transcribed in 245. 2) A collective title supplied by the cataloguer in 245 when the collection lacks such a title, as opposed to transcribing part titles.

Re: [RDA-L] Collective cities

2013-12-17 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
  > -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod > Sent: December-17-13 4:46 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Collective c

Re: [RDA-L] Collective cities

2013-12-17 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Heidrun quoted RDA: >It seems RDA calls this a "conventional collective title". The glossary >gives as the definition: "A title used as the preferred title for a >compilation containing two or more works by one person, family, or >corporate body, or two or more parts of a work (e.g., Works, Poe

Re: [RDA-L] Collective cities

2013-12-17 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Mac, Yes, I was only talking about collective titles as a subtype of the former uniform titles. It seems RDA calls this a "conventional collective title". The glossary gives as the definition: "A title used as the preferred title for a compilation containing two or more works by one person,

Re: [RDA-L] Collective cities

2013-12-17 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Heidrun said: >With respect to collective titles ... I think we need to keep clear the distinction among: 1) A collective title on the manifestation transcribed in 245. 2) A collective title supplied by the cataloguer in 245 when the collection lacks such a title, as opposed to transcribing par