On 17/12/2013 20.33, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
I think we need to keep clear the distinction among:
1) A collective title on the manifestation transcribed in 245.
2) A collective title supplied by the cataloguer in 245 when the
collection lacks such a title, as opposed to transcribing part titles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
> Sent: December-17-13 4:46 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Collective c
Heidrun quoted RDA:
>It seems RDA calls this a "conventional collective title". The glossary
>gives as the definition: "A title used as the preferred title for a
>compilation containing two or more works by one person, family, or
>corporate body, or two or more parts of a work (e.g., Works, Poe
Mac,
Yes, I was only talking about collective titles as a subtype of the
former uniform titles.
It seems RDA calls this a "conventional collective title". The glossary
gives as the definition: "A title used as the preferred title for a
compilation containing two or more works by one person,
Heidrun said:
>With respect to collective titles ...
I think we need to keep clear the distinction among:
1) A collective title on the manifestation transcribed in 245.
2) A collective title supplied by the cataloguer in 245 when the
collection lacks such a title, as opposed to transcribing par
5 matches
Mail list logo