Heidrun discussed at head of title.
One of the more frustrating situations for us is diversity in
treatment of artists' names at head of title for exhibition
catalogues. If the subtitle is distinctive, some see the artist's
name as responsible person at head of title. I finally persuated
Lucia
19.03.2013 21:58, J. McRee Elrod:
Theses are produced in one or a very few number of copies, without editorial
review or peer review in the same way
that published monographs are made.
..
For consistency we should consider electronic theses as published.
That print ones are not is a
Mac,
With 264 0, the distinction means little in RDA. Only one fixed field
and 264 2nd indicator are affected.
This is not RDA, it is MARC. I have said for some time that I think that
the whole continuum from unpublished to published needs to be rethought in
light of the history of the book
Bernhard,
First off, thank you for continuing to contribute. I have learned a great
deal from your posts.
Second, I agree that the notion of publication needs reconsideration in
light of a longer consideration of the history of the book from ancient
times until now. I do not think that
RDA-L readers,
Below are some examples to illustrate the relationships between AACR2, ISBD
punctuation, RDA, and MARC. I would be grateful if you would look them over
and let me know if anything seems not in proper accordance.
Comments, criticisms and corrections are eagerly
awaited! Note:
A quick question. RDA 2.5.2.2 states that the sources of information for an
edition statement are:
1. the same source as the title proper
2. another source within the resource itself
3. one of the other sources of information specified under 2.2.4
Under 2.2.4 we find that the sources of
I concur with your reading of RDA. The only caveat in 2.2.4 is that you have to
indicate that it was taken from outside the resource itself, either using
square brackets or a note saying that the edition information was supplied by
the cataloger, or something to that effect.
Damian Iseminger
2.2.4 goes on to say: If information taken from a source outside the
resource itself is supplied in any of the elements listed below, indicate
that fact either by means of a note or by some other means (e.g., through
coding or the use of square brackets). And Edition statement is listed
below.
Michael Borries asked:
So, between these two instructions, am I allowed to supply an edition state=
ment if there is none in the resource itself, as was allowed under AACR2 1.=
2B4? Or should I instead give the information in a note?
SLC will supply edition in 250 (where it is more likely to be
9 matches
Mail list logo
