RE: Still not working!

Title: Message Hi, my_2_cents I didn't follow teh topic. How do you install PHP to work with your apache ? Did you enable particular api? Third part or something else ? The order is kind of important. What was the ways of the severals installation ? /my_2_cents -- ism -Message

RE: installations problems with RH8.0

-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) Envoye : vendredi 20 decembre 2002 14:32 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : installations problems with RH8.0 Hi all I've a strange problem with the installation of a

RE: RE : installations problems with RH8.0

Ismael, On this point all seems to be all right my HDD Is configured as a master, but the bios say me that my disk is around 8Go (it's a 10GO disk), and the linux system see the 10 GO. I 've flashupdated my bios whith the most recent flash image (September 1999) it doesn't work

RE: boot disk

Hi, mkbootdisk `uname-r`, I guess. You can in other way enter directly the version-of-your-kernel. -- ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de M. Schild Envoye : mercredi 4 decembre 2002 11:50 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : boot disk

RE: boot disk

Hi, mkbootdisk `uname-r`, I guess. You can in other way enter directly the version-of-your-kernel. -- ism Sorry ! mkbootdisk `uname -r` -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: The new Kernel

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:55:42PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote: No problems for me yet on an RH 7.3 athlon 2.4.18-18 (or 17) kernel or on 8.0 on the same kernel versions. One is an Ultra/100 (7.3) and the other is an Ultra/66 (8.0) controller. Weird! I've got the latest firmware in

RE: poptmodule.so

Hi Emmannuel, all, I got it yet installed the 4.0.3-1.03 (the native one of my installation). Any more idea ? Look in the updates. Emmanuel It's what I do for *several* days... Look at this, I restart from the *beginning*. [RH7.2 -i386-] -Updated KDE packages are available

RE: poptmodule.so

OK, my problem is over. Erratas weren't clear to me. Erratas aren't clear to me. It was a problem of dependencies resolution that a rpm following solve. So I installed the rpm(s) which problem occured and then apply the rpm that correct this problem of dependencies resolution. Thanks to

poptmodule.so

Hello, I know it's recursive problem but I can't find any manipulation that avoid me to have this error: poptmodule.so is needed by up2date.2.8.39-1.7.2 I'm upgrading my system and for KDE update I encounter this problem. [RHEA-2001:158 and then RHEA-2002:024-23 -in fact the last one-]

RE: poptmodule.so

You need the rpm-python package, something like that Thank you, I got it yet installed the 4.0.3-1.03 (the native one of my installation). Any more idea ? ism -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe

RE: Failure on applying RHSA-2002: 197-06

Here is the error (I put the output of rpm -Fvh *.rpm): 1- glibc-common ### [25%] 2- glibcwarning: /etc/localtime created as /etc/localtime.rpmnew ### [50%] 3-glibc-devel ### [75%] 4-nscd ### [100%] error : db3 error (-30998) from db-close :

Failure on applying RHSA-2002: 197-06

Hi everyone, I'm currently updating my RH7.2. All was really clean until my 27th rpm. It's RHSA-2002: 197-06 [Updated glibc packages fix vulnerabilities in resolver] of the 2002-10-03. In fact, it is the RHSA-2001:160-09 of the 2001-12-14 that I had to apply but this one was outdated by the

RE: Update

Just recently installed Red-Hat Linux, and know nothing about linux in general. When I go to the up2date service, there was a number of patches and updates. All installed o.k., except the kernel files. They just freeze, and do nothing. Are these not updateable through the auto feature or

RPMs chronological ?

Hi, I have to update a new system (fresh installation). I 'm downloading RPMs but sometimes the RPM is oudated by another one. So what about the sort of installations ? It seems to me that some RPM of 'replacement' are after some new kernell upgrade ? What the stuff here ? Will it create some

RE: RPMs chronological ?

Hi, I have to update a new system (fresh installation). I 'm downloading RPMs but sometimes the RPM is oudated by another one. So what about the sort of installations ? It seems to me that some RPM of 'replacement' are after some new kernell upgrade ? What the stuff here ? Will it create

erratas and architecture

hello world, Is the lack of package for an i686 means that the architcture of it has no bug or security problem, altought i386 got packages ? Thank for the detail, ism -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe

outdated by

Hi, I'm upgrading my system applying erratas for a brand new installation. I saw a thing that I never seen before regarding my little experience with erratas. For some updates, packages, it's written down 'outdated by'. I understand that as the package is now obsolet regarding the following

up2date (was:Tonight I got hacked.)

Tonight I finally got hacked. If your system was kept up to date, you would be the first report I've seen of someone getting hacked. It's critical for all Internet-accessible servers to be kept current with OS patches. Red Hat provides for a *free* up2date service. You absolutely must

RE: Tape Drive

Hola, I believe it's /dev/st0 for SCSI Tape. Look here : http://rute.sourceforge.net Great doc on entire linux stuff. ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin;redhat.com]De la part de IS Department Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2002 03:52 À : [EMAIL

RE: Tonight I got hacked.

Hi, TirpWire is doing the stuff you want, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de linux power Envoyé : jeudi 17 octobre 2002 11:55 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Tonight I got hacked. Wiil you go through all the system scripts and

RE: Tonight I got hacked.

] Objet : RE: Tonight I got hacked. Are u sure? I have no time to expriment. Ismael Touama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, TirpWire is doing the stuff you want, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin;redhat.com]De la part de linux power Envoyé : jeudi 17

RE: X - Window Problem

Hi, You maybe log to much graphically as root. Look at /tmp and /root (df or du) to see if enough space is on your disk. All I can say. Also give more info, for better help, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Santhosh Envoye :

RE: Apache + ASP Module

Hello, Installing the Appache::ASP API is not simple as you guess. It has been quite time that I stop it du to some problem with my server and ... linux learning too. I will restart it in few weeks I hope. First when I installed it, I only use the way of compilation to install it. RPMs makes

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Kent Borg Envoye : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 19:30 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RAID1 with GRUB On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:09:40PM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote: I'm sorry but I don't

Premature end of file

Hi, When trying to restore my data with cpio I've got the following as error outpout: premature end of file. What does it mean and how can I avoid it ? Thanks for help. olé ism -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe

RE: Premature end of file

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 12:02 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Premature end of file Hi, When trying to restore my data with cpio I've got the following as error outpout: premature end of file. What does it mean and how can I

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Kent Borg Envoye : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 17:28 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RAID1 with GRUB On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:37:56AM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote: What do you mean ? My

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

Hola, What do you mean ? My server is in RAID1 and got GRUB. No particular problem to do it. olé ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Philip Tong Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2002 11:22 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RAID1 with GRUB Does

Restoring

Hi rhers, I currently learn backing up and restoring my data. I used cpio to backup my /usr partition as is: find /usr print0 | cpio -ovc /home/User/Backup/usr_bkp02092002 I delete intentionly /usr as root. Now, cpio -idvm /home/User/Backup/usr_bkp02092002 doesn't restore my partition and so

...Backup Laws

Hi everyone, I saw Ashley K.M send a topic on backups. I wish you give some links where I can learn to make backups. This including different case so I can restore in the best and quick way lost data, configuration or partition... I'd like to know what partition to backup, what kind of restore

RE: ...Backup Laws

PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoyé : mercredi 28 août 2002 09:53 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : ...Backup Laws Hi everyone, I saw Ashley K.M send a topic on backups. I wish you give some links where I can learn to make backups. This including different case so I can restore in the best

RE: Download RH Betas

hi, try sunsite.unc.educ. olé, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Spanke, Alexander Envoyé : mardi 27 août 2002 12:27 À : 'RedHat General - Mailinglist' Objet : Download RH Betas Hi, Where can i download the limbo beta ? Alex

RE: [fastdep] error 135

Hi, You maybe have to look, check your command line. You maybe enter a bad syntax or something like that. Secondly, pay caution to your kernel, look at erratas. bbsc ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Lisa Envoyé : jeudi 25 juillet

RE: PHP Vulnerability

Hi Emmanuel, My RH7.3 has PHP version 4.1.2-7. In the php.net it tells that PHP versions 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 have the vunarability. Are you shure we have to do the patch? You don't. No Red Hat distrib is vulnerable to the latest PHP bug. Emmanuel How can you ensure of that ? I should have

RE: apache

hi, it's the principle of apache, it prepares child process to hook up the appending request. bbsc ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ximo Llacer Envoyé : mardi 23 juillet 2002 10:56 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : apache I'd like to

RE: X crashed

Hi, I have the same the problem than you, for different reason. When you install a new police font you have to say to your XF86Config file where's the police is located. I hope it's not a Type1 one. If not you can do the following. Edit with vi /etc/X11/XF86Config file. And then add the font

RE: X crashed

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoye : vendredi 19 juillet 2002 11:29 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: X crashed Hi, I have the same the problem than you, for different reason. When you install a new police font you have to say to your XF86Config file

RE: Erratas regarding uninstalling and re-installing RPMs

Hi again, I re-issue my demand, because I wasn't able to locate my problem, so I gonna erase Xfree86 package and so on xfs. Thanks you for helping: 07172002 Hi, I' ve got some problem with my Font Server, so my X-window can not start. Regarding differents applied erratas can I erase XFree RPMs

Erratas regarding uninstalling and re-installing RPMs

Hi, I' ve got some problem with my Font Server, so my X-window can not start. Regarding differents applied erratas can I erase XFree RPMs nicely without bugs or security problems ? I assume I'll have to reinstall latest erratas... But won't there be a conflict or whatever with kernel as true as

Which var and tmp files can I erase ?

Hi, I lost my X server from few days and I think it's due to my /tmp and in other way /var files. The maintenance system (tmpwatch) seems to had not work correctly. I'd like to delete some files that take space on my disk. Someones told me to pass in runlevel 1 and then do the suppression,

RE: Which var and tmp files can I erase ?

Fatal server error: Could not open default default font 'fixed' This is a font problem. I'm not sure which font file contains fixed, but you should probably just verify all font packages with: rpm -qa | fgrep fonts | xargs rpm -V and reinstall any font packages which have

RH7.2 MySQL-3.23.51 compilation issues.

Hi, I gonna install MySQL on my system. I 'm reading MySQL's manualand see that there can be some problem with some Redhat Linux distros... What are these problems ? Is the 7.2 is concerned ? So in this case and like the manual shows, i put the following at configuration time: ./configure

RE: newbie apache problem

Hi, what do you do to run him ? I guess hostname problem is not that your apache don't want to start. It may be started yet. Verify this by typing in : ps -aux | grep httpd If started or not, try to locate you daemon httpd and then you can running it... To solve your hostname pb, go to your

RE: newbie apache problem

apache problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Jun-2002/14:11 +0200, Ismael Touama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If started or not, try to locate you daemon httpd and then you can running it... To solve your hostname pb, go to your httpd.conf and then change the good directive

Mozilla at the first connection

Hi, when entering http://localhost, my mozilla hangs and take a near.. hmm' hmm', 77 sec !! to charge the page !! Konqueror tkae it less a second ! When i reload the page with mozilla, it takes les than a second. Is someone know such a behavior ? THank you bbsc ism

72 and 86,7 Mo of RPMs

Hi everyone, For near a month, I didn't check for erratas... So I did it yesterday, I just finish : 72 rpms ! OK I made a big stupid installation of rh7.2. But it takes a while !! And I ask myself if is it the good way to keep up to date my system ? *with no use of up2date or something else*

Why not from the current directory ?

Hi, I recently install mod_perl-1.26 + apache_1.3.20. This, had modify my web utils as httpd, apachectl in the bin directory of /usr/local/apache. I can use it except when i'm in the /usr/local/apache/bin . Is there something wrong ? Why I cannot ! Thank you for any explanations... bbsc, ism

RE: Why not from the current directory ?

PROTECTED]]De la part de Tom Wilson Envoyé : mardi 21 mai 2002 14:07 À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : RE: Why not from the current directory ? Ismael Touama wrote: Hi, I recently install mod_perl-1.26 + apache_1.3.20. This, had modify my web utils as httpd, apachectl in the bin directory of /usr

RE: Why not from the current directory ?

PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Why not from the current directory ? On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:37:57PM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote: Why must we use this prefix to make works a program ? When you type a command, the system looks in a predefined list of directories for the command. If it finds it, it runs

Konkeror Mozilla

Hi all. What's the trouble the way these browser are requesting my web server !? I enter this- http://localhost *KONKEROR: Handle the request in the time and gives the right good page i guess, in my own tongue. *MOZILLA: Handle the request but after 99.986 secs of research. Furthermore it

RE: Konkeror Mozilla

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoyé : jeudi 16 mai 2002 12:06 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Konkeror Mozilla Hi all. What's the trouble the way these browser are requesting my web server !? I enter this- http://localhost *KONKEROR: Handle the request in the time and gives

RE: What are you doing for virus protection

Hi, the few I know: - Don't go over the internet as root. - Put an IDS (as tripwire) on your linux machine (against trojans) - Be aware of patchs, new releases and then upgrade. - Linux don't fear a lot of virus 3 or 6 I believe. If infected, the only touched will be the one who's logged

RE:APACHE and its releases (was: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #4390 - 13 msgs)

apache.org ? bbsc, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Hilkiah Lavinier Envoyé : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:25 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #4390 - 13 msgs Hi does anyone know of a website which compares and

[OT] About 7.3

Hi rhml, Rh7.3 is out, and i ask myself some questions. My knowledge of how linux get work is seemlessly NULL. We've just buy rh7.2(january), and I upgrade my kernell after having upgrade soft, rpms... concerned by erratas. But now, what is actually the method to implement OS that they're in

TR: What's the deal after compilling....

Oï, Yesterday I erase my binary rpm based apache distribution. I compile and then install (make install) mod_perl and apache_1.3.24. Still yesterday httpd -l gave me the right good modules. But today I can't use httpd anymore ! I've got severals: # find / -name httpd /home/httpd

RE: [OT] About 7.3

From: Ismael Touama [EMAIL PROTECTED] But now, what is actually the method to implement OS that they're in constant evolution. Upgrade. Most people only tweak a few applications. The rest of package will upgrade with no problem. $ So what ?! sorry, don't understand... $ I don't speak about

The year's sylliest question

Hi rhl, I don't manage finding my sources for apache on my rh72. Is the installation include all sources for each soft of my configuration ? Do rpms' installations disable sources installation too ? Thanks in all case to indicates me my sources for apache-1.3.20 which is on my system. Regards

RE: how to change the sys date

try to running tzselect, it is to set your initial clock component. But man before. bbsc, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Amir Tal Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 17:44 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: how to change the sys date On

RE: stability

you a working boot...the floppy that you build will simply have the kernel, and the current boot parameters (where the root partition is, etc)...it will still boot the init scripts that are stored on your hard drive. On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Ismael Touama wrote: Hi! I intend to use a disket-boot

RE: undoing perl Makefile.PL

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Cameron Simpson Envoye : vendredi 12 avril 2002 09:16 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: undoing perl Makefile.PL On 14:09 10 Apr 2002, Ismael Touama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | in order to set the mod_perl module to apache I run the following command | line

stability

Hi! I intend to use a disket-boot to find my system stable. Is it a good idea ? Indeed I made a lot of faked operation intending to instal/ configure Apache::ASP and I'm affraid now my system stinks ! I don't have important data stored on it so can I ? Thank you, the request is quite urgent so

[OT] undoing perl Makefile.PL

Hi, in order to set the mod_perl module to apache I run the following command line: perl Makefile.PL But I guess I take a bad module. I want to restart the operation but with a clean stable state, so I want to reset this command, is there a way ? Thank you for really needed help! ism

UPS

Hi ! Don't find any documentation on redhat's site concerning UPS... Can someone give one ? Find some stuff but i'd like to have redhat one... thx, ism ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: all RPMs ?

E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-30635-1017367798-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 08:51, Ismael Touama wrote: =20 I don't uinderstand one (and more...) thing in Linux

RE: all RPMs ?

What do you mean by 'swap proc system'? I was just speaking about /proc/swaps... but I don't believe it's the matter... ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

all RPMs ?

Hi, I don't uinderstand one (and more...) thing in Linux implementation. Are all softwares installed as RPMs ? or is there another issue. I had probleme with MM siftware (brahms) and in fact I don't have any needs of multimedia player,viewer, listener... on my server. So when rpm -qa | grep

RE: librpm.so.0 librpmio.so.0

Hi, rpm -ql your.rpm lists all files that you.rpm needs, so then after you can simply cp to your/directory/that/lacks/of/this/file... ...so I guess. ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Billy R Nordyke Envoye : mardi 26 mars 2002

About last announced PHP vulnerability...

Hi there, on the errata page it is downloadable only for i386 architecture. Is that mean that I do not need these rpms if I'm on i686 ? On my system a rpm -qa |grep 'php' gives details above... asp2php-0.75.17-1 php-4.0.6-7 asp2php-gtk-0.75.17-1 php-imap-4.0.6-7 php-pgsqlp-4.0.6-7

RE: Apache

Hi, I just read doc to install and configure Apache. So I saw that : The cgi-bin directory is set up to allow the execution of CGI scripts, with the ExecCGI option. If you need to execute a CGI script in another directory, you will need to set ExecCGI for that directory. For example, if your

md5 GPG NOT OK

HEllo, done this rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.9-31 and GPG key is not OK... I downloaded it(s)[several RPMs] from mirror. Is that quite normal or do I have to take care ? Thank you. ism ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:39 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent. On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: Results during upgrade is as this: kernel..[25%] You need this. kernel

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

+0100, Ismael Touama wrote: it's done but ...you wrote: mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3 where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel. You mean actual now 2.4.9-31 I have still bootdisquette 2.4.7-10 Actually, it's better to make a bootdisk with a kernel that you know works. That way, if anything

RE: md5 GPG NOT OK

about public key. Thanks, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Trond Eivind Glomsrød Envoyé : mercredi 20 mars 2002 16:36 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: md5 GPG NOT OK Ismael Touama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HEllo, done this rpm

RE: /boot/grub/grub.conf 644

Apparently and in my memory, when I installed/choose this loader, it hangs this new encryption. Indeed I have a md5 password (?) line in my grub.conf. However it hadn't been mentionned relative to ths update kernel in the section speaking about ... ? I don't mind, cause if the line appears it's

RE: /boot/grub/grub.conf 644

, and it 's also troubling that the encryoted password can be read by all !! Ok it's disturbing me too so if you have more info ... Thx ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 12:39 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet

Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

Hi, I'd just update my kernel. I've to change grub.conf now! Results during upgrade is as this: kernel..[25%] kernel-debug[50%] kernel-enterprise...[75%] kernel-smp..[100%] Is there someone who can explain this to me ? Or giving a link... Thank you, ism Somehow we're

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

-guide/kernel. html And while you're at it, read this also: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/ch-rpm. html On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 10:17, Ismael Touama wrote: Is there someone who can explain this to me ? Or giving a link

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:39 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent. On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: Results during upgrade is as this: kernel..[25%] You need this. kernel-debug[50%] You probably

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: Results during upgrade is as this: kernel..[25%] You need this. kernel-debug[50%] You probably do not need this. kernel-enterprise...[75%] kernel-smp..[100%] You do not need this. Is there someone who can explain

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

at 10:17, Ismael Touama wrote: Is there someone who can explain this to me ? Or giving a link... ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 14 mars 2002 20:09 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera Hi. cd to the directory where you have *all* the new glibc rpms and do: rpm -Fvh glibc-2.2.4-19.3* and all should be fine. - Original Message - From: Ismael

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

Hi! -Start E.S- Create a directory. Put all the glibc related rpms from the updates in that directory. You should have: glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm glibc-devel-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm glibc-profile-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm -End E.S- $ I 'm on i686 so I

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: $ I 'm on i686 so I expect I just need : - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]* - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09]* Keep only the one which is in the updates directory right now $ I applied the 121-06

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

, for common lib it has just did it until 50% !? Hooo ! Maybe because of the -devel !! Ok let's process and then ... KERNELL Thank you Emmanuel. Hope I wasn't too much a schmock! ism. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoye : vendredi 15

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera - END -

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman Envoye : vendredi 15 mars 2002 14:33 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: dependencies errata ecaetera On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:07:17PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: $ It's my system who asked for ! as I wrote, for depedencies... $ The strangest

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 19:34 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your Pentium 2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box. If you don't find the package you

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

13 mars 2002 19:34 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your Pentium 2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box. If you don't find the package you need on the i686 directory, just grab the package from i386

RE: *****SPAM*****

address. This is why I have complained many times to the redhat list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent the mail. I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears. Ismael Touama wrote: Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail

dependencies errata ecaetera

Oï, Intended to upgrade and correct my system, I have to upgrade these RPMs: glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06] glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09] ~don't understand why the same name, even if same element~ kernel-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm kernel-debug-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

Argh'! no one can help ? Sorry but didn't find good information, plus don't find glibc-common.2.2.4-19.3. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 14:52 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : dependencies

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

Envoye : mercredi 13 mars 2002 18:57 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: dependencies errata ecaetera On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: Argh'! no one can help ? Sorry but didn't find good information, plus don't find glibc-common.2.2.4-19.3. It's in the i386 directory

[HS] SPAM

Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc- Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ? Is there none an anti-spam ? I believe it's since i'm here. Thx, ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Why so slow !!!!

Hello again, Why does the ftp download is so long to transfert data ? At the begining it's quite allright. But really fast it goes under 5Ko/s My championship record : 1 ko/s Is it my connection (-I'm on ADSL !a download spreading hell!-, the distance or so ? Thanks for details cause

RE: [HS] SPAM

it was falling on deaf ears. Ismael Touama wrote: Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc- Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ? Is there none an anti-spam ? I believe it's since i'm here. Thx, ism -Message d'origine

RE: [HS] SPAM

provide off-list contact information if all strings of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] were deleted? Ismael Touama wrote: Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc- Am I the only one or do you recieve the same

RE: [HS] SPAM

and you will see it. I am using Netscape, which shows all headers. And it shows your address plain as day. From: Ismael Touama ismael.touama@I removed the doamin name Ismael Touama wrote: It doesn't appear below but appear above in expeditor field!! I'm on Outlook, soory for the insult

RE: [HS] SPAM

PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 09:33 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [HS] SPAM Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc- Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ? Is there none an anti-spam ? I

RE: Why so slow !!!!

:57PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote: Hello again, Why does the ftp download is so long to transfert data ? At the begining it's quite allright. But really fast it goes under 5Ko/s My championship record : 1 ko/s Is it my connection (-I'm on ADSL !a download spreading hell

RE: [HS] SPAM

strings of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] were deleted? Ismael Touama wrote: Hi, Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc- Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ? Is there none an anti-spam ? I believe it's

RE: Transfert, linux to win, by floppy

really thanks Jerry, what an accurate answer ! Thanks for the time sorry for my late return...(I don't know where to go anymore since I try using linux!!) ism -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Jerry Winegarden Envoye : jeudi 21 fevrier

  1   2   >