Charles,
Thank you for the info.
Steven
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/8/2000 at 9:52 PM Charles Galpin wrote:
Hi Steven
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steven Pierce wrote:
Charles,
Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
to this
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
Sure! Change the order that your machine checks the names
set it to check files first, then dns. You should be able
to do this in a number of places, including Linuxconf.
-Original Message-
From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL
"Burke, Thomas G." wrote:
I thought I had done this, already... Which files are they, I don't recall
now.
/etc/host.conf
here is what mine looks like
order hosts,bind
multi on
you can add the ipaddresses for the machines on your local net in the
/etc/hosts file
the following format works
-
From: Bret Hughes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
"Burke, Thomas G." wrote:
I thought I had done this, already... Which files are they, I don't
recall
now.
/etc/host.conf
here is
At 01:18 PM 08/10/2000 -0400, you wrote:
Interesting, as that's what mine looks like too...
Of course, I'm using my ISP's doamin rather than my own... Maybe that's the
problem, but I would think it woud pull them from my hosts file before it
went off looking for a DNS..
hermm... What's up
Roy Harrison wrote:
check /etc/nsswitch.conf file. it has the order of lookup in there.
Roy
I thought that was only used for NIS?
Bret
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
At 03:47 PM 08/10/2000 -0500, you wrote:
Roy Harrison wrote:
check /etc/nsswitch.conf file. it has the order of lookup in there.
Roy
I thought that was only used for NIS?
Bret
Nope... it can also cause long delays in logging on if it's not configured
right.
Roy
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000, you wrote:
Charles,
Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week,
so
I will have some more timeG Question... Can you put the DNS servers
yes, I think in my original email I sugegsted that. Just be be clear
though, on each machine (windows and linux) he should
1. put the name/ip pairs of all machines on his LAN in the
"hosts" file. This is /etc/hosts for linux, and somewhere under the
windows dir for windows (use the find feature
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
yes, I think in my original email I sugegsted that. Just be be clear
though, on each machine (windows and linux) he should
1. put the name/ip pairs of all machines on his LAN in the
"hosts" file. This is /etc/hosts for linux, and somewhere under the
windows
suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
Agreed.
However, a "caching only" nameserver, only serving the internal interface
can
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
Sorry to come in late to this exchange...
I ave no DNS installed on my machine. However, I am running an internal
network 0n 192.168.68.x...
These machines need to have names, so I chose names I new were unused on my
ISP's network - thus, ny
Charles,
Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week, so
I will have some more timeG Question... Can you put the DNS servers behind the
firewall for protection?? Or
Hi Steven
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steven Pierce wrote:
Charles,
Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week,
so
I will have some more timeG Question... Can you
Hi Nigel
You got several answers, all quite correct, but proabbly a bit high
level. Let me try describe what everyone is suggesting the way I'd like it
explained to me ;)
She will want to configure her LAN as follows. Sorry, but my ascii art
sucks
internet
|
DSL router/modem
Nigel Trivass wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me help a colleague in the US, with the
setting up of a small networkusing the following:
PC [win98], NT server, Redhat server, a hub, a router and DSL
None of the above are currently networked together.
We have purchased one
There are a few different ways to do what you are looking for. From my
point of view the easiest would be to set either the Red Hat or NT system up
as a NAT router connected to the DSL modem. Then with an additional NIC
form a local network connect it with the rest of the machines. With proper
Thanks very much Bret - I'll give this a go on Monday.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 July 2000 15:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
Nigel Trivass wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me help a colleague
Thanks very much Jamin, I'll be in touch on Monday.
-Original Message-
From: Jamin Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 July 2000 15:09
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
There are a few different ways to do what you are looking for. From my
point of view
19 matches
Mail list logo
