On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 07:44 PM, M. Parcheur wrote:
In your personal directory /home/user/ there is a file
.Xclients-default; you can edit it like this:
**
#!/bin/bash
# (c) 2000 Red Hat, Inc.
exec /usr/local/bin/fluxbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:39:36 -0400, Lukas Fried wrote:
Anyone know how to setup the fluxbox window manager in RH9? I installed
the latest version from a source tarball but I can't seem to use it.
I've added exec fluxbox and exec /usr/local/bin
the file /etc/X11/gdm/Sessions/fluxbox like this:
#!/bin/bash
exec /etc/X11/xdm/Xsessions fluxbox
***
Regards.
M. Parcheur
Anyone know how to setup the fluxbox window manager in RH9? I installed
I've added
Anyone know how to setup the fluxbox window manager in RH9? I installed
the latest version from a source tarball but I can't seem to use it.
I've added exec fluxbox and exec /usr/local/bin/fluxbox to the file
/etc/X11/gdm/Sessions/fluxbox (which I had to make) but it doesn't show
up
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 01:26 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
http://www.fedora.us has a working Fluxbox package. And yes, it
also provides session type info for gdm.
Thanks for telling me this. It will probably help me a lot...that is,
when I get my RH9 box running again. It keeps hanging
Le 27/06/2003 01:13, « Stephen Kuhn » [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:15, Nilesh Sahita wrote:
I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
GNOME/KDE.
However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
entries / launchers that I
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:14:23AM +0200, Zoki wrote:
*** The whole logic of changing a WM is not to have the same stufff as your
previous one.
[...]
I'd say that's true for everything except the menus... One might still
want to be able to access all programs installed... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:14:23AM +0200, Zoki wrote:
*** The whole logic of changing a WM is not to have the same stufff as your
previous one.
[...]
I'd say that's true for everything except the menus... One might still
want to be
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:02PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks
(and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to launch
OpenOffice applications and several Wine emulated MS apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
Use
apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background
(company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on
the desktop to launch
OpenOffice applications and several Wine emulated
MS apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
--
redhat-list mailing list
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
My question is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:12:41PM +0200, Manuel Aróstegui Ramirez wrote:
I use Window Maker, for my is the best one, it is so
fast, what about RAM...? for wm RAM is not a
problem...;-)
Right. Also, Window Maker is extremely easy to configure and there are
tons of themes available for it...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks rather outdated in my eyes... ;-)
But that's a matter of personal
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:02PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks rather outdated in my eyes... ;-)
Intrestingly enough, I feel it looks like Mac OS X, the most modern
operating system out there right
Well I guess, I have to take a look at wm then...
Cornelius
T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of
emulated MS apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
I put my vote in for XFCE 4. I know it's in beta right now, but it is stable
(has been for a while now, I was running the CVS versions), fast and nice.
Uses the GTK2 libraries (so is highly compatble with GNOME apps), has the
anti
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
with the RPM's, there are *way* too many of them to consider it a newbie
installation.
]
Subject: Re: Which window manager I should use? Blackbox, FWM, or
something else?
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:55, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
with the RPM's, there are *way*
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:59:15AM +1000, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
emacs for a word processor...
Hmm... I think you mean emacs for a text editor and LaTeX for a word
processor... Now THAT almost scares even me... ;-)
Cheers,
--
Javier Gostling D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
Same here...
Having been influenced by what has been said in this thread, I decided to give a
try to WindowMaker / BlackBox / XCFE. As far as xfce is concerned, I only found
one RPM in SourceForge (and I don't think anything is missing).
I don't like too much, though - BlackBox seems to be my
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 04:27, Bret Hughes wrote:
Huh. I must have done something wrong then I only installed one. Since
this thread started I have played with Icewm and xfce on my 7.3 laptop.
I punted on nautilus over a year ago but still use gnome. Thing are
faster without gnome.
The
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:15, Nilesh Sahita wrote:
I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
GNOME/KDE.
However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
entries / launchers that I have in KDE or GNOME. Is there anyway to
import KDE / GNOME menus
Well, I am the guy who started this thread. XFCE is EXACTLY what I wanted. What
I did was I re-installed RH9.0 with KDE and Gnome programs I like and after that
did all 11 XFCE rpms! XFCE has almost everything I need, other stuff is taken
from KDE and XFCE launches it for me. I can tell you that I
just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to launch
OpenOffice applications and several Wine emulated MS apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to launch
OpenOffice applications and several Wine emulated MS apps.
Which window manager I should go
to launch
OpenOffice applications and several Wine emulated MS apps.
Which window manager I should go with?
I can recommend Window Maker, which would seem to fit the bill very
well. Unfortunately, RH decided not to include it anymore, but you can
either rebuild the RH8 ones or the Mandrake RPMs
users need these features once or twice
in their lifetime...).
Which window manager I should go with?
My preference: BlackBox, with WindowMaker being second close.
My advice: take your time in selecting and putting together the elements of the
integrated solution (your desktop standard
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
Which window manager I should go with?
Personally, I'm using ROX with TWM, and it flies. Note that if you use
such a setup, you'll need to configure ROX's compatibility options to:
1. Overrride TWM's control of rox panels
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
Which window manager I should go with?
Personally, I'm using ROX with TWM, and it flies. Note that if you use
such a setup, you'll need
.
Which window manager I should go with?
I put my vote in for XFCE 4. I know it's in beta right now, but it is stable
(has been for a while now, I was running the CVS versions), fast and nice.
Uses the GTK2 libraries (so is highly compatble with GNOME apps), has the
anti-aliasing of fonts, simple
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:25, Michael Scottaline wrote:
Give ratpoison a try. No eye-candy or decorations, but fully functional,
small footprint and fast as lightining!
Best,
Mike
Actually, wouldn't that be a great migration from WinXP? PINE/MUTT for
email,
Hi,
I am currently using kde desktop but I would like to switch to gnome default
desktop but I am unsure hoe to do this. Can someone tell me how.
Thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
Use the desktop switching tool. Look in your Kmenu under system.
John Salamone wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using kde desktop but I would like to switch to gnome default
desktop but I am unsure hoe to do this. Can someone tell me how.
Thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
Or at log in time. Just pick session, and select the one you want.
Ric
John Nichel wrote:
Use the desktop switching tool. Look in your Kmenu under system.
John Salamone wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using kde desktop but I would like to switch to gnome
default
desktop but I am unsure hoe to
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 03:05, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
Or at log in time. Just pick session, and select the one you want.
Ric
John Nichel wrote:
Use the desktop switching tool. Look in your Kmenu under system.
John Salamone wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using kde desktop but I would
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Laurent ZUDAIRE wrote:
How to use Sawfish window manager instead Metacity ?
# .bash_profile
export WINDOW_MANAGER=/usr/bin/sawfish
--
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
- Unknown
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
RedHat 8
How to use Sawfish window manager instead Metacity ?
Thanks for help
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I recently installed a test server running Redhat 8. Switch from Sawfish
to Metacity was like going backwards, so I installed sawfish and used
the following command to switch it:
killall metacity sawfish
My question, where is the windowmanger choice stored in Redhat 8? How
can I change the
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:07:00AM -0400, Aaron Rolett wrote:
: I recently installed a test server running Redhat 8. Switch from Sawfish
: to Metacity was like going backwards, so I installed sawfish and used
: the following command to switch it:
:
: killall metacity sawfish
:
: My question,
I've been unable to find a capplet for changing the default window manager
in Gnome under 8.0. The window-minimizing animation is driving me batty,
but I can't seem to find a place to edit that, either.
Metacity seems to have zero documentation: no man pages, no info
pages, and no FAQ on ye
Well, I still can't figure out how to make metacity behave like a decent
window manager, but I finally figured out how to replace it. (What was Red
Hat thinking when they took away the nice little window manager
configuration applet?)
Anyway, the trick is to define the WINDOW_MANAGER environment
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I've been unable to find a capplet for changing the default window manager
in Gnome under 8.0. The window-minimizing animation is driving me batty,
but I can't seem to find a place to edit that, either.
I know that removing the animation thingie
Hi,
I managed to install RH 7.3 eventually. I have currently a problem
with sawfish: under Gnome, I use the sawfish window manager, but cannot
manage to configure it.
Every time I access the Sawfish tools (e.g., from the Gnome control center),
it keeps saying that sawfish is not running, while
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
I've got a small configuration(2MO Video RAM), which window manager is
better to use in that case !!!
I made very good experiences with Window Maker on such configurations (and
smaller ones). One thing I like about
Tuesday, at 14:06, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) sent through the Star Gate:
Hi,
I've got a small configuration(2MO Video RAM), which window manager is
better to use in that case !!!
Fvwm works well. I don't recommend using any programs that are heavy in
graphics. Pine for email, Lynx
On 19:29 17 Apr 2002, Gordon Messmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 09:28, Henrik Schmiediche wrote:
| I am running RH7.2 with KDE 2.2.2. Is it possible to control a window from
| the command line. For example, if I want to start a program from a shell
| script and then
On Apr 17, 2002, 09:12 (-0500) Fred Dech wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:17:50PM -0700, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
--- Fred Dech wrote:
http://www.fvwm.org/
read FAQ and README's in spare time
i guess they don't come as RPMs, so you'd want to do a tar-ball
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 09:28, Henrik Schmiediche wrote:
I am running RH7.2 with KDE 2.2.2. Is it possible to control a window from
the command line. For example, if I want to start a program from a shell
script and then minimize or maximize it without user intervention - can that
be done?
Hi,
I've got a small configuration(2MO Video RAM), which window manager is
better to use in that case !!!
thanks
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
I've got a small configuration(2MO Video RAM), which window manager is
better to use in that case !!!
The default wm (sawfish) is pretty good, you just have to use
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:28:35AM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
I've got a small configuration(2MO Video RAM), which window manager is
better to use in that case !!!
2Mo of Video RAM is small
Why, when I was young,
The default wm (sawfish) is pretty good, you just have to use
May you tell me the way to install it !!!
-Message d'origine-
De : Emmanuel Seyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 16 avril 2002 15:10
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: window manager choice ???
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:28:35AM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
I've got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
May you tell me the way to install it !!!
If you're using Red Hat 7.2, it should already be installed. If it is not,
then use
rpm -ivh /path/sawfish*.rpm
Tony
- --
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
May you tell me the way to install it !!!
You'll need to install the fvwm2 and fvwm2-icons rpms
that should be on your RH CD.
Use the switchdesk program to choose AnotherLevel as desktop
and you should be set.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 04:11:58PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
May you tell me the way to install it !!!
You'll need to install the fvwm2 and fvwm2-icons rpms
that should be on your RH CD.
Use the
To add it to the choice when starting in runlevel 5 (for the moment i
see KDE or GNOME) which files neede to be modified???
Is the graphical interface in which whe can choose window manager called
xdm ???
PS:please apologize my poor english-language !!!
-Message d'origine-
De : Anthony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Dech wrote:
You'll need to install the fvwm2 and fvwm2-icons rpms
that should be on your RH CD.
Use the switchdesk program to choose AnotherLevel as desktop
and you should be set.
i don't think it's quite that straightforward; at least
fvwm2 is a good (fast) choice. I also hear good things about XFce in
that regard, though I've not tried it.
- -d
- --
David Talkington
I have been using Xfce for years and love it.
Linda Hanigan
___
Redhat-list mailing
window manager.
I am running RH7.2 and was running gnome and sawfish when I last was using
the computer. I would appreciate any suggestions.
david
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
and cannot find the configuration file
for starting my window manager.
I am running RH7.2 and was running gnome and sawfish when I last was using
the computer. I would appreciate any suggestions.
david
Sounds like you somehow nuked your config files for X, so when you log
into X, it starts w/ twm
"Michael S. McLeod" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am running RH7, when I try to run the "Sawfish Window Mangaer" it
crashes (stops). I have to use "Kill App" to close the window. No
error messages are desplayed. Anybody have any ideas what is wrong and
how to fix it?
Clean install or
Mostly a clean install, I have tried installing the new Helix code (Ximian) to
see if it would fix the problem but it didn't. I tried to install WP8 but
because the RH7 libc is the wrong version for WP8 that didn't work. I had the
problem with Sawfish before the install. Otherwise I have
I am running RH7, when I try to run the "Sawfish Window Mangaer" it
crashes (stops). I have to use "Kill App" to close the window. No
error messages are desplayed. Anybody have any ideas what is wrong and
how to fix it?
Michael
___
Redhat-list
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 11:40:01PM -0400, Statux wrote:
WindowMaker is one of the best out there. :)
However, the 0.62.x versions tend to have problems with 8bit displays -
there has been a lot of talk about this on the mailing lists.
Unfortunately, 0.62.x also fix some annoying buglets which
unfortunately? sounds pretty good to me :)
Who uses 8bit anymore? :)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Blackbox has some very nice graphics.
In addition to the suggestions which have been made (all good so
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Thomas R. Shannon wrote:
In addition to the suggestions which have been made (all good so far),
I can say that once set up, Sawfish has never crashed on me. That's
saying quite a bit for such a young program.
I run GNOME with Sawfish but I'm also going to chime in
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Chip Rose.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:43:06AM +, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
twm. It comes standard with the X. It's very stable because it is
very simple and hasn't changed much in 10 years.
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than
WindowMaker is one of the best out there. :)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Chip Rose.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On redhat 6.2 what src.rpm contains the default .xinitrc file. I'd like
to change it so that it starts up with a different window manager on a
fresh install.
Thanks,
Frank
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On redhat 6.2 what src.rpm contains the default .xinitrc file. I'd like
to change it so that it starts up with a different window manager on a
fresh install.
Thanks,
Frank
okay I feel stupid. Its in the xinitrc src.rpm.
What I should have said was where does Redhat define which window
BTW, are you creating your own distribution or something? You seem to
be rebuilding a whole collection of rpms the last few days!
Thank you for the explanation. Yes I am building a customized Redhat 6.2
distribution. At the moment its simply RH 6.2 with alot of different
packages so its
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:36:15AM -0300, robsmith wrote:
Since everyone loves the "which window manager is best discussion"...I figured I
would ask which is better sawfish or sawmill they seem very similiar to
me...any major differences?
Actualy they are the same window manage
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
Since everyone loves the "which window manager is best discussion"...I figured I
would ask which is better sawfish or sawmill they seem very similiar to
me...any major differences?
IIRC, SawMill is just "Sawfish" renamed, due to
Hello to all ...
I wondered what window manager you will recommend me if I want it to be fast
and easy to use (menu access to apps, for ex.). I have a P-150 and I don't use
GNOME or KDE.
Thanks for the reply
Kerem
___
Redhat-list mailing list
I love xfce
Linda Hanigan
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Kerem Unal wrote:
Hello to all ...
I wondered what window manager you will recommend me if I want it to be fast
and easy to use (menu access to apps, for ex.). I have a P-150 and I don't use
GNOME or KDE.
I usually recommend WindowMaker under these circumstances
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Kerem Unal wrote:
Hello to all ...
I wondered what window manager you will recommend me if I want it to be fast
and easy to use (menu access to apps, for ex.). I have a P-150 and I don't use
GNOME or KDE.
I'd recommend WindowMaker. It's relatively lightweight, quite
Since everyone loves the "which window manager is best discussion"...I figured I
would ask which is better sawfish or sawmill they seem very similiar to
me...any major differences?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
) To enable X at boot time I have this entry id:5:initdefault
in /etc/inittab. It comes up using owm window manager, is there a
way to change the window manger at the boot time. I would like to
use fvwm window manager.
3) How to shutdown if X was started at the boot time of linux .
Ctrl Atl Del doesn't work
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Robert Hailman wrote:
Does anyone know where I could find a guide to programming Window Managers
for X
The O'Reilly Xlib programming reference manuals.
or recommend a small ( 30k) window manager that I could use as the base
for my own simple window manager?
http
I am running Redhat 5.0 and not too long ago, I did...something (I do not
know exactly what) such that now the default window manager when I
"startx" is plain ole fvwm. I hate it. I would like to get back to, I
believe, fvwm2 so I can use one of the alternative "flavors", i
I have installed the _real_ AfterStep on my RH 5 box. I was wondering
which file(s) control the creation of the menus in the default RH window
manager (FVWM, I think). I want to add those menu items to my .steprc
file. Thanks for helping an Xneophyte.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Chuck Mead wrote:
/etc/X11/xinit/Xclients
On 3 May, Darque wrote:
OK...I give up. I have looked and looked, but been unable to find any
instructions anywhere on what I need to change to make X load a different
window manager than the Fvwm that cam
On 3 May, Darque wrote:
OK...I give up. I have looked and looked, but been unable to find any
instructions anywhere on what I need to change to make X load a different
window manager than the Fvwm that cam on my RH5.0 CD. I have D/L'd Afterstep,
and would like to try that, but I am
Hello,
I am having a similar problem logging in while running xdm. No matter
what I do , I cannot seem to get any window manager to come up but twm.
I have changed about every "dot" file I know of (.xinitrc, .xsession,
.Xclients, etc..) - inserting the line 'exec afterstep' in it a
Hello, jdk.
instructions anywhere on what I need to change to make X load a different
window manager than the Fvwm that cam on my RH5.0 CD.
This method will allow u to set a diff wm for each user .. Create a script
named ~/.Xclients as follows:
---
#!/bin/bash
OK...I give up. I have looked and looked, but been unable to find any
instructions anywhere on what I need to change to make X load a different
window manager than the Fvwm that cam on my RH5.0 CD. I have D/L'd Afterstep,
and would like to try that, but I am at a loss...
Also, can anyone tell
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Darque wrote:
OK...I give up. I have looked and looked, but been unable to find any
instructions anywhere on what I need to change to make X load a different
window manager than the Fvwm that cam on my RH5.0 CD. I have D/L'd Afterstep,
and would like to try that, but I
93 matches
Mail list logo
