On Jun 17, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott
mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>>
wrote:
7) Section 10.2.3 - The definition of "last changed" event type seems to be
inconsistent with "upDate" defined in RFC 5731,5732,5733. For example, I report
an extract from RFC5731 here
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, at 08:23, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 7) Section 10.2.3 - The definition of "last changed" event type seems
> to be inconsistent with "upDate" defined in RFC 5731,5732,5733. For
> example, I report an extract from RFC5731 here in the following:
>
>- An OPTIONAL
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:35:26PM +, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> From: Mario Loffredo
>> In my opinion "errorCode" should be required while "description"
>> should be optional. About "title", I don't have a clear position.
>
> Something else to think about. RFC 7480 describes required error
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:23:45PM +, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
>> 5) Section 4.4 - The following sentence seems to be inconsistent
>> with the content of some figures (e.g. Fig. 15, 17, 23, ...) where
>> a "lang" element is included in jCard
>>
>>
Hi Antoin and everyone,
I would like to ask for a timeslot to discuss the reporting draft.
Thanks
Joseph
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:31 AM Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It is time again to start thinking about scheduling a meeting for IETF 108.
> As you are aware, IETF 108 will be an
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Query
Parameters for Result Sorting and Paging
Authors
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Partial
Response
Authors : Mario Loffredo
> -Original Message-
> From: Mario Loffredo
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:05 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org;
> internet-dra...@ietf.org; i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-
> 00.txt
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
Hi Scott,
please find my comments below.
Il 17/06/2020 15:23, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:09 AM
To: regext@ietf.org; internet-dra...@ietf.org; i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action:
Hi Scott,
Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno 17 giu 2020, alle ore 15:34, Hollenbeck, Scott
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>
> From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:14 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action:
>
From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:14 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt
Hi Scott,
please find below some possible changes to RFC7482bis.
1) Section 1. - I would replace "are" with
From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:09 AM
To: regext@ietf.org; internet-dra...@ietf.org; i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt
Hi Scott,
please find below some possible changes to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Registry Maintenance Notifications for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Authors
13 matches
Mail list logo
