Hi Scott,
it seems to me that the choice depends on the extent of the changes to
be made. If the update process involves any change with limited impact
on both client and server implementations a Draft Standard appears more
suitable, otherwise we should opt for a Proposed Standard.
At
On 2019-08-01 11:47 -0500, Gavin Brown wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what's the difference between a Draft Standard and a
Proposed Standard?
"Draft Standard" was mostly discontinued in 2011, so just "Standard".
But basically the difference between Proposed Standard and just Standard
Hi Scott,
Forgive my ignorance, but what's the difference between a Draft Standard and a
Proposed Standard?
+1 either way!
G.
> On 1 Aug 2019, at 17:23, Hollenbeck, Scott
> wrote:
>
> Folks, during the IETF meeting we talked a little bit about the possibility
> of re-doing the RDAP
Folks, during the IETF meeting we talked a little bit about the possibility of
re-doing the RDAP protocol specs to address clarifications and errata
identified as a result of implementation experience. We didn't have a lot of
time to talk through the possibilities, so I thought I'd start
