[reiserfs-list] Why reiserfs seems slower?

2001-07-09 Thread Eric Wang
Our system are using: Redhat 6.2 Kernel 2.2.19 Reiserfs Patch 3.5.33 LVM 0.97 When I do a "ls -al" in my reiserfs partition, even in single user mode, it list eveything line by line, kind of slowly, like go back the time that everybody use a terminal many years ago. OK, I know it doesn't necess

[reiserfs-list] Where does this bug come from?

2001-07-09 Thread Xuan Baldauf
Hello Hans, here is some oddness experienced with reiserfs on a server which runs on reiserfs at least since linux-2.4.0-test10. Please look at this shell listing: plato:~ # cd temp plato:~/temp # cd flow plato:~/temp/flow # ls -1|head -n 7 /dev/initctl /etc/mtab /lib/libc.so.6 /lib/libc.so.6 /

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 is out .. reiserfs patch needed ?

2001-07-09 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Eric Whiting wrote: > This generation number thing confuses/kills a single solaris 2.8 NFS > client for something as simple as doing a ./configure of bonnie++ on a > linux NFSV2 server. Neil Brown observed the same problem on a Solaris > 2.6 client. I can't ./configure bonnie++ no matter what I t

Re: [reiserfs-list] The mount patch at 2.4.6: it is needed?

2001-07-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, July 05, 2001 04:14:49 PM -0300 "Thomas T. Soares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all. > > I did a test applying the v2.4.5/fs/reiserfs/super.c (umount) patch over > the new 2.4.6 and no .rej was renerated plus the system seems to be > operating normally with this kernel...

Re: [reiserfs-list] knfsd patches for 2.4.6

2001-07-09 Thread Eric Whiting
You might try this -- It fixes a lot of reiserfs/knfsd problems for me. http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux/2.4.6-pre9/patch-A-reisergen eric Martin Goik wrote: > > Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last > month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch

Re: [reiserfs-list] knfsd patches for 2.4.6

2001-07-09 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:18:39PM +0200, Martin Goik wrote: > Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last > month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch for 2.4.6 is still needed > or simply not being released yet. http://www.reiserfs.org/download.html > only offers linu

Re: [reiserfs-list] Some obscure messages with postfix(20010228pl03-5) and probably reiser-fs(3.6.25)

2001-07-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:41:00 PM +0400 "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Jörg Spilker wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> here a part of my syslog: >> >> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536: >> client=localhost[127.0.0.1] >> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cl

Re: [reiserfs-list] Aging Effects of Filesystem

2001-07-09 Thread pcg
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Dirk Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me packing tails sounds like an excellent way to improve performance, (not only for you) > especially for lots of small files. That it performs much worse than > disabling this code in practice is diffic

[reiserfs-list] Re: Reiserfs usage of get_hash_table()

2001-07-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 09:06:16 PM -0300 Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was taking a look at reiserfs code on 2.4.5 and I found out something > which may be hurting performance quite badly. > > There are quite a few places using get_hash_table() in the code wit

Re: [reiserfs-list] Aging Effects of Filesystem

2001-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Mon, 09 Jul 2001, Constantin Loizides wrote: > I would like to inform you about the status of my project. > Therefore I have put a page on the web, which gives some details: > http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de/~loizides/reiserfs/ Interesting. Is there any explanation why Reiserfs perform

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 2.4.6-ac1 big diffs in inode.c<-Curious

2001-07-09 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, July 06, 2001 01:22:51 PM -0800 Richard Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just wondering why inode.c has almost fifty lines difference between > 2.4.6 and 2.4.6-ac1 - any critical fixes here? Nothing critical. The ac kernels have a large cleanup patch from me, I wanted to

[reiserfs-list] Aging Effects of Filesystem

2001-07-09 Thread Constantin Loizides
Hi ReiserFS friends, as introduced several weeks ago, I am investigating aging effects on reiserfs partitions with different workloads. I would like to inform you about the status of my project. Therefore I have put a page on the web, which gives some details: http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt

[reiserfs-list] knfsd patches for 2.4.6

2001-07-09 Thread Martin Goik
Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch for 2.4.6 is still needed or simply not being released yet. http://www.reiserfs.org/download.html only offers linux-2.4.5-reiserfs-knfsd-patch.bz2 which yields "hunks failed ...".

Re: [reiserfs-list] Lost partition?

2001-07-09 Thread Nikita Danilov
Adam Jenkins writes: > > Please ignore that, I got my data back. Hadn't realised reiserfs uses > ext2 partitions, so I added aonther with fdisk, no big deal. > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [reiserfs-list] Lost partition? > > > > > > I'm trying to recover a reiserfs partitio

[reiserfs-list] Asynchronous metadata changes

2001-07-09 Thread Xuan Baldauf
Hello, I'm currently try to delete a directory with more than 50k entries on a heavily loaded server. Wondering why this takes so long I straced "rm" and found out that only 2..3 entries are unlinked per second. This really slow rate is, I suppose, due to the fact that metadata updates are made