Our system are using:
Redhat 6.2
Kernel 2.2.19
Reiserfs Patch 3.5.33
LVM 0.97
When I do a "ls -al" in my reiserfs partition, even in single user mode, it
list eveything line by line, kind of slowly, like go back the time that everybody
use a terminal many years ago.
OK, I know it doesn't necess
Hello Hans,
here is some oddness experienced with reiserfs on a server
which runs on reiserfs at least since linux-2.4.0-test10.
Please look at this shell listing:
plato:~ # cd temp
plato:~/temp # cd flow
plato:~/temp/flow # ls -1|head -n 7
/dev/initctl
/etc/mtab
/lib/libc.so.6
/lib/libc.so.6
/
Eric Whiting wrote:
> This generation number thing confuses/kills a single solaris 2.8 NFS
> client for something as simple as doing a ./configure of bonnie++ on a
> linux NFSV2 server. Neil Brown observed the same problem on a Solaris
> 2.6 client. I can't ./configure bonnie++ no matter what I t
On Thursday, July 05, 2001 04:14:49 PM -0300 "Thomas T. Soares"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I did a test applying the v2.4.5/fs/reiserfs/super.c (umount) patch over
> the new 2.4.6 and no .rej was renerated plus the system seems to be
> operating normally with this kernel...
You might try this -- It fixes a lot of reiserfs/knfsd problems for
me.
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux/2.4.6-pre9/patch-A-reisergen
eric
Martin Goik wrote:
>
> Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last
> month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:18:39PM +0200, Martin Goik wrote:
> Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last
> month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch for 2.4.6 is still needed
> or simply not being released yet. http://www.reiserfs.org/download.html
> only offers linu
On Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:41:00 PM +0400 "Vladimir V. Saveliev"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> > Jörg Spilker wrote:
> >> Hello,
>> >> here a part of my syslog:
>> >> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536:
>> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cl
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Dirk Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me packing tails sounds like an excellent way to improve performance,
(not only for you)
> especially for lots of small files. That it performs much worse than
> disabling this code in practice is diffic
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 09:06:16 PM -0300 Marcelo Tosatti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was taking a look at reiserfs code on 2.4.5 and I found out something
> which may be hurting performance quite badly.
>
> There are quite a few places using get_hash_table() in the code wit
On Mon, 09 Jul 2001, Constantin Loizides wrote:
> I would like to inform you about the status of my project.
> Therefore I have put a page on the web, which gives some details:
> http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de/~loizides/reiserfs/
Interesting. Is there any explanation why Reiserfs perform
On Friday, July 06, 2001 01:22:51 PM -0800 Richard Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering why inode.c has almost fifty lines difference between
> 2.4.6 and 2.4.6-ac1 - any critical fixes here?
Nothing critical. The ac kernels have a large cleanup patch from me, I
wanted to
Hi ReiserFS friends,
as introduced several weeks ago, I am investigating
aging effects on reiserfs partitions with different workloads.
I would like to inform you about the status of my project.
Therefore I have put a page on the web, which gives some details:
http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt
Title says it all: Reading the messages from this list for the last
month I could not find any hint if knfsd patch for 2.4.6 is still needed
or simply not being released yet. http://www.reiserfs.org/download.html
only offers linux-2.4.5-reiserfs-knfsd-patch.bz2 which yields "hunks
failed ...".
Adam Jenkins writes:
>
> Please ignore that, I got my data back. Hadn't realised reiserfs uses
> ext2 partitions, so I added aonther with fdisk, no big deal.
>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [reiserfs-list] Lost partition?
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to recover a reiserfs partitio
Hello,
I'm currently try to delete a directory with more than 50k
entries on a heavily loaded server. Wondering why this takes
so long I straced "rm" and found out that only 2..3 entries
are unlinked per second.
This really slow rate is, I suppose, due to the fact that
metadata updates are made
15 matches
Mail list logo