On Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:40:57 PM +0300 Oleg Drokin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:11:01PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
well with REISERFS_CHECK On
still 2.4.16?
excuse my inexactness. Accurately its a 2.4.17pre1
among other miscs patches like
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002 02:49:40 PM +0100 Andre Holzner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Reiserfs Gurus,
I'm using Redhat's 2.2.19-6.2.1.1 on a Pentium III SMP Machine with
ReiserFS version 3.5.34(w/quota support).
I just managed to crash the machine once again by doing a
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:42:45AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
I understand that some of these patches may originate from Chris Mason
(e.g. quota), but for others, I'm totally lost. I have checked namesys
ftp repository and have not found anything even remotely resembling some
of
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002 06:46:26 PM +0300 Oleg Drokin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:42:45AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
I understand that some of these patches may originate from Chris Mason
(e.g. quota), but for others, I'm totally lost. I have
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:41:36 +0300
Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, Oh!
where are most of these patches from? What is their source?
Can you reproduce your problem with 2.4.17 (or 2.4.18-pre2 if
you prefer) without any additional patches, or with only
patches from
Hi all,
Has anyone tried using ReiserFS on iSCSI disk (SCSI over TCP/IP)?
Basically, can ReiserFS handle a logical device that has long
write delay, and writes that might be cached (or reordered) for a
much longer time than physical disk?
Thanks!
Wilson
On Mit, 09 Jan 2002, W. Wilson Ho wrote:
write delay, and writes that might be cached (or reordered) for a
much longer time than physical disk?
Are you sure that iSCSI reorders writes ? that would be pretty stupid.
Dirk
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:18:28 PST, W. Wilson Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has anyone tried using ReiserFS on iSCSI disk (SCSI over TCP/IP)?
Basically, can ReiserFS handle a logical device that has long
write delay, and writes that might be cached (or reordered) for a
much longer time
Hi,
thanks for the prompt answer...
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002 02:49:40 PM +0100 Andre Holzner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
kernel: PAP-5190: search_for_position_by_key: found item [4355 4358 1
-1], item_len 34819,
item_location 23048
On 2002-01-09T11:18:28,
W. Wilson Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has anyone tried using ReiserFS on iSCSI disk (SCSI over TCP/IP)?
Basically, can ReiserFS handle a logical device that has long
write delay, and writes that might be cached (or reordered) for a
much longer time than
Hi,
Hi,
thanks for the prompt answer...
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002 02:49:40 PM +0100 Andre Holzner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
kernel: PAP-5190: search_for_position_by_key: found item [4355 4358 1
-1], item_len 34819,
As a hand-waving guess, it sounds like you want to store your data far away
for disaster recovery purposes? In this case, I would suggest doing either
remote backups or checking out DRBD (on http://www.linbit.com/), a network
mirroring block device.
Linux also has enbd (Enhanced Network
Hi,
I've experienced another crash this morning.
I'v recorded the message displayed on the screen:
-8
journal-601, buffer write failed
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP: 0010:[c018a7f9] Not tainted
13 matches
Mail list logo