Hi!
I did a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree, and it didn't give me errors. If I do a
simple (read-only) reiserfsck on the repaired partition, I get the following:
Checking S+tree... [...]
bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
I get a couple of these errors, so the fs still doesn't seam
Hi,
i get some more errors, I didn't mention in the first mail:
[...]
shrink_id_map: objectid map shrinked: used 4096,5 blocks
[...]
grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120. 5 blocks
[...]
As I mentioned in the first mail, all this happens after "reiserfsck
--rebuild-tree".
Any hints???
On Die, 12 Jun 2001, Lars Grobe wrote:
> shrink_id_map: objectid map shrinked: used 4096,5 blocks
> [...]
> grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120. 5 blocks
> [...]
they're not errors, just debug output. Ignore it. I don`t know why it is
still printed, its so confusing..
Dirk
This experimental version now has a "-z" command-line option to specify
the seed for random number generation as suggested by several people on
this list.
When I do repeated runs of it I don't see results being any closer
together than when using different random seeds. But it will hopefully
Hi Dirk!
Dirk Mueller wrote:
> they're not errors, just debug output. Ignore it. I don`t know why it is
> still printed, its so confusing..
And what about
bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
I have a fileserver down for days now and I am getting in trouble...
That's
why I star
On Die, 12 Jun 2001, root wrote:
> bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
shared data never sounds nice.
Which version of reiserfsck did you use ?
You could try finding out which files are affected and simply copy and then
delete them. Probably the corruption should be solved t
Hi!
> I just remounted the fs, I hope that the bad_stat_data isn't a serious
> error?
And umounted again... a du gave me a lot of permission-denied-errors,
and a dmesg full of
vs-13049: reiserfs_iget: Looking for (xxx yyy), found inode of (aaa bbb)
(reiserfs doesn't really say xxx, but gives m
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 04:03, Lars Grobe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I did a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree, and it didn't give me errors. If I do a
> simple (read-only) reiserfsck on the repaired partition, I get the
> following:
>
> Checking S+tree... [...]
> bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
Hi,
I searched in the mailinglist archives but did not find a clear
answer which kernel and nfs daemon to use to export space on a
raid array formatted with reiserfs.
Here is what I want to do:
--
Export a 130GByte Raid Array to various servers containing
webspace and the
Hi Ed!
> Which version of reiserfsck? Which version of linux?
>
> Ed Tomlinson
reiserfsck 3.x.0j
linux 2.4.4
lvm 0.9
IBM Serveraid driver 4.72
Thank You, CU, Lars.
--
Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1!
http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a
--
G
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 08:45, Lars Grobe wrote:
> Hi Ed!
>
> > Which version of reiserfsck? Which version of linux?
> >
> > Ed Tomlinson
>
> reiserfsck 3.x.0j
> linux 2.4.4
> lvm 0.9
> IBM Serveraid driver 4.72
You might want to try
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre/reiserfsprogs-3.x
On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 02:00:36 AM +0200 Jens Benecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when working on files (i.e. having open files) on my laptop reiserfs
> accesses the disk every 5 seconds. this effectively prevents the disk from
> spinning down, i.e. APM modes to take over, even
Hi all,
In reiserfs 3.5.32, an IO error (say a failed bread) results in an attempt to
deref a bogus pointer.
In search_by_key in stree.c (around line 480) the search path is released on an
IO error. This returns ITEM_NOT_FOUND to search_for_postion_by_key with the path
length set to ILLE
Hello,
while this is probably already addressed in the patch for big-endian
reiserfs support, I noticed a bug when looking at resierfs_statfs.
You are byte-swapping the (generic) superblock s_blocksize field,
which is already in CPU byte order. The other fields are from the
reiserfs on-disk super
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:32:48AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Hello,
> while this is probably already addressed in the patch for big-endian
> reiserfs support, I noticed a bug when looking at resierfs_statfs.
> You are byte-swapping the (generic) superblock s_blocksize field,
> which is alread
Hi Ed!
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> You might want to try
>
> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre/reiserfsprogs-3.x.0k-pre8.tar.gz
I did, but it didn't help. reiserfsck -o told me that there were 665
errors that could be fixed with --fix-fixable, but -o -x just showed the
errors, without any
Hey, anyone have a ReiserFS Quota howto or something? I want to get quotas on my
drive. Also, I was wondering if anyone knew how to do bandwidth throttling? So
people outside of my local network can only download from my box at a certain data
rate. Thank you!
-- Ken
> Hi!
>
> I did a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree, and it didn't give me errors. If I do a
> simple (read-only) reiserfsck on the repaired partition, I get the following:
>
> Checking S+tree... [...]
> bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
>
> I get a couple of these errors, so the fs s
Hi Vitaly!
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for delay, some problems with my computer.
>
> shared files are cured with -o option with --rebuild-tree.
No joke? ;-) I did --rebuild-tree 2 times and -x -o one time,
-x many times... but never combined --rebuild-tree with anything...
I think
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 02:00:36 AM +0200 Jens Benecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > when working on files (i.e. having open files) on my laptop reiserfs
> > accesses the disk every 5 seconds. this effectively prevents the disk from
> > spinning down, i.
Hi Ken,
there are patches, you should look for the right ones for your
version of the reiserfs, kernel and reiserfs utilities.
BTW: Is there a way to move the quota settings from a ext2 to
reiserfs? I have 500 users and don't want to edit all the
quotas...
CU, Lars.
> > Hi Vitaly!
> This is corruption which should be cured without rebuilding and
> it will be fixed.
I see, the documentation is up-to-date, the implementation is to follow
;-)))
> I am sorry for temporary inconvinience.
Don't be sorry, your work is hopefully going to rescue our data ;-) I
hav
> Hi Vitaly!
>
> Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for delay, some problems with my computer.
> >
> > shared files are cured with -o option with --rebuild-tree.
>
> No joke? ;-) I did --rebuild-tree 2 times and -x -o one time,
> -x many times... but never combined --rebuild-tree w
Hi!
> BTW: Is there a way to move the quota settings from a ext2 to
> reiserfs? I have 500 users and don't want to edit all the
> quotas...
I've done this without any problems. What problems do you had ?
I've simply copied the quota.user file to the new destination and
remounted it (to initi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I searched in the mailinglist archives but did not find a clear
> answer which kernel and nfs daemon to use to export space on a
> raid array formatted with reiserfs.
>
> Here is what I want to do:
> --
> Export a 130GByte Raid
25 matches
Mail list logo
