json-glib 1.5.2

News Overview of changes for 1.6 == • Add getters with default fallback for JsonObject [Emmanuele Bassi] • #26 - Clarify some expections of the json_object_get_*_member APIs [Debarshi Ray] • #29 - Improve reproducibility of the build [Ravish Bhatia] • Use

graphene 1.10.2

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.10/graphene-1.10.2.tar.xz (286K) sha256sum: e97de8208f1aac4f913d4fa71ab73a7034e807186feb2abe55876e51c425a7f6 ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

And approval 2/2. Ciao, Emmanuele. On Mon, 2 Mar, 2020 at 09:11, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Approval 1 ___ release-team@gnome.org Release-team lurker? Do NOT

libepoxy 1.5.4

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/libepoxy/1.5/libepoxy-1.5.4.tar.xz (222K) sha256sum: 0bd2cc681dfeffdef739cb29913f8c3caa47a88a451fd2bc6e606c02997289d2 ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: New Mutter dependency: Graphene

d-meta: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/merge_requests/420> Ciao, Emmanuele. On Wed, 16 Oct, 2019 at 17:32, Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: No specific reason beyong the API we depend on being added on 1.9.3. Em qua, 16 de out de 2019 às 16:31, Emmanuele Bass

Re: Time to move to Discord...?

We should definitely use to GitLab for tracking actionable items identified during discussion and meetings, but the discussion should not happen on GitLab issues. Ciao, Emmanuele. On Sat, 12 Oct, 2019 at 08:47, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:20 am, Andre Klapper

Re: New Mutter dependency: Graphene

Is there a specific reason why you're depending on an (older) unstable snapshot, instead of depending on Graphene 1.10.0? Ciao, Emmanuele. On Wed, 16 Oct, 2019 at 12:22, Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via release-team wrote: Greetings, I hereby notify that Mutter will depend on a graphene

Straw man proposal: changing the versioning scheme of GNOME releases

I've written down a straw man on Discourse: Comments are very welcome. Ciao, Emmanuele. ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Maintainers should announce build-related changes in their modules

On Fri, 13 Sep, 2019 at 10:21, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 10:12 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel- list wrote: Not every single problem we have in building a complex project like GNOME can be solved by a script; if it were, we wouldn't need maintainers, and y'all

Re: Maintainers should announce build-related changes in their modules

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 22:40, Philip Withnall wrote: > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 19:14 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep, 2019 at 19:08, Philip Withnall > wrote: > > That sounds like something people are going to forget to do. Would it be > possible to use

Re: Maintainers should announce build-related changes in their modules

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 23:49, Michael Gratton wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep, 2019 at 22:39, Philip Withnall > wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 19:14 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Sep, 2019 at 19:08, Philip Withnall > >> wrote: > >>> T

Re: Maintainers should announce build-related changes in their modules

On Thu, 12 Sep, 2019 at 19:08, Philip Withnall wrote: That sounds like something people are going to forget to do. Would it be possible to use computers to automate this? It's software: anything is possible. As to whether we can automate this **right now**, the answer is: no. I'm not going

Maintainers should announce build-related changes in their modules

Hi all; the 3.34 release is out of the door, but before we go into the 3.35 development cycle, the release team would like to kindly ask **all** GNOME maintainers to send an email to release-team@gnome.org (and possibly Cc: distributor-l...@gnome.org

Re: Announcement of new dependencies for GNOME modules

On , Abderrahim Kitouni wrote: Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 15:24, a écrit : On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:59 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > ``` > If you change anything related to the build system: > > - dependencies > - build options > > then send a message to release-team@g

Re: Announcement of new dependencies for GNOME modules

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM, Jordan Petridis via release-team wrote: Should we extend this to tweaking/adding/removing meson options? Good point, yes. Mmmh, I don't want to complicate the messaging too much by conflating two separate contexts, unless

Re: Announcement of new dependencies for GNOME modules

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:48 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: - the minimum required version of the dependency Can it be optional if gnome-build-meta has the new enough version already? That assumes that the maintainers will go through the gnome-build-meta

Re: Announcement of new dependencies for GNOME modules

On , Andre Klapper wrote: On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 13:48 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: [ This is the draft of the email I'm planning to send to desktop-devel, and publish on Discourse. Feedback is very much welcome. ] LGTM; final version should probably also be added to https://wiki.gnome.org

Announcement of new dependencies for GNOME modules

[ This is the draft of the email I'm planning to send to desktop-devel, and publish on Discourse. Feedback is very much welcome. ] Hi all; the 3.34 release is out of the door, but before we go into the 3.35 development cycle, the release team would like to kindly ask **all** GNOME

Re: Freeze exception request: gnome-shell

On , Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hi!, Here's another gnome-shell bug that might nice to have soon: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/706 Impact is low, and tested correct, even if the related issue was not verified fixed. Indeed, let's avoid borking the shell by reading

Re: freeze break request: clean up X property in at-spi2-core

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 10:57 AM, Mike Gorse wrote: I don't think that it would be the end of the world if this fix has to wait for 3.34.1, but, on the other hand, it fixes a regression introduced in the 3.34 cycle, so I'd lean towards committing it if people

graphene 1.10.0

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.10/graphene-1.10.0.tar.xz (283K) sha256sum: 406d97f51dd4ca61e91f84666a00c3e976d3e667cd248b76d92fdb35ce876499 ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Second Epiphany freeze break request

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM, Javier Jardón wrote: One approval for you Any seconds? I thought I sent mine, but it seems I left it in the drafts. 2/2 approval. Ciao, Emmanuele. ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Third Epiphany freeze break request

On , Andre Klapper wrote: On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 08:41 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Adrian found an integer underflow that breaks the adblocker in incognito mode: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/423/diffs Would be great to have another freeze exception to fix this.

Re: GNOME Shell freeze break request

On , Iain Lane wrote: I discovered this morning¹ that if you toggle mute/unmute in Shell 3.33.90 then your volume is not restored to what it was before - it's left at 0. The reason is that Shell's volume slider responds to the initial muting by setting itself to empty, but this also triggers the

Re: freeze break request: use after free in at-spi2-core

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:04 PM, Mike Gorse wrote: I need to fix a use after free in at-spi2-core. Patch attached. Sorry everyone. Carelessness on my part. It happens, here's approval 1 / 2 And here's the 2 / 2 Ciao, Emmanuele.

Re: Code freeze break request

On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to request code freeze break to merge this fix: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/419/diffs It might fix (a) a bug causing various Epiphany features to break, and (b) some UI process memory corruption. Should be very low-risk

graphene 1.9.6

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.9/graphene-1.9.6.tar.xz (245K) sha256sum: d4ed42ba50f915b7f883d165167d9a3258b91e741b21175eaec3d654a22ce161 ___ release-team@gnome.org

graphene 1.9.4

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.9/graphene-1.9.4.tar.xz (243K) sha256sum: a5171b2cb9fd08fe440931a850cb7c3d222b2d347c4644543c65019546e5ffad ___ release-team@gnome.org

graphene 1.9.2

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.9/graphene-1.9.2.tar.xz (126K) sha256sum: 2ea0566ef746d6ca4709ae9fa6a7567178516d12a6be0cd27fd8a43f714e3dbc ___ release-team@gnome.org

graphene 1.8.6

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.8/graphene-1.8.6.tar.xz (125K) sha256sum: 82a07f188d34eb69df4b087b5e1d66e918475f59f7e62fb0308e2c91432a712f ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: String/UI Freeze Break (#2) - totem

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 15:32, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 13:52 +0100, Piotr Drąg wrote: > > pon., 25 lut 2019 o 13:44 Bastien Nocera > > napisał(a): > > > Hey, > > > > > > This removes some UI which isn't connected to anything anymore. > > > There > > > aren't any screenshots

Re: GNOME Music freeze break request

Thank you for the clarification; in one of the issues you linked I saw the error screen with a GDBus blurb and I got worried. :-) It's +1 from me (release-team). Ciao, Emmanuele. On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 16:43, Jean Felder wrote: > > > Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 12:16, Emmanuele Bassi

Re: GNOME Music freeze break request

Are we really showing a GDBus error message in a landing screen aimed at newcomers? Because that would be an immediate -1 from me. Ciao, Emmanuele. On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 11:08, Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n < gnome-i...@gnome.org> wrote: > Early in the freeze, so 1/2 from i18n. > >

libepoxy 1.5.3

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/libepoxy/1.5/libepoxy-1.5.3.tar.xz (215K) sha256sum: 002958c5528321edd53440235d3c44e71b5b1e09b9177e8daf677450b6c4433d ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

With 24 hours to go from the cut off deadline for 3.30, I don’t think this is a good idea; this can wait for 3.30.1, and might as well use the appropriate fix. Most distros will ship that version anyway. Ciao, Emmanuele. On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 17:13, verdre wrote: > I have an alternative

Re: Logo Proposal for GNOME 4 (2020)

Hi; I honestly don't understand what this means. What's "GNOME 4"? Why "2020"? What's "gingerblue"? What is this logo for? Additionally, you keep "releasing" tarballs of "gingerblue" on download.gnome.org, and every time you do, you're sending emails to the release team; but all those releases

graphene 1.8.2

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.8/graphene-1.8.2.tar.xz (124K) sha256sum: b3fcf20996e57b1f4df3941caac10f143bb29890a42f7a65407cd19271fc89f7 ___ release-team@gnome.org

[gobject-introspection] Created branch gnome-3-28

The branch 'gnome-3-28' was created pointing to: 81c7db8... Release 1.55.2 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

libepoxy 1.5.0

ChangeLog = commit 28ca626eda5c331d94ad96b9e67f0b98177a9dbf Author: Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gnome.org> Date: Sat Feb 24 14:07:18 2018 + tests: Add EGL test for Epoxy API We have a few public entry points that we ought to test properly. Using the E

graphene 1.8.0

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.8/graphene-1.8.0.tar.xz (124K) sha256sum: 7bbc8e2f183acb522e1d9fe256f5fb483ce42260bfeb3ae69320aeb649dd8d91 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

graphene 1.6.2

ChangeLog = https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.6/graphene-1.6.2.changes (367K) Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.6/graphene-1.6.2.tar.xz (485K) sha256sum: 8f7d1984c06aefe3b47a668c12ad9f3db0bcb2d09c55e6267b82a90f6b10d961

json-glib 1.4.2

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/json-glib/1.4/json-glib-1.4.2.tar.xz (160K) sha256sum: 2d7709a44749c7318599a6829322e081915bdc73f5be5045882ed120bb686dc8 ___ release-team@gnome.org

json-glib 1.4.0

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/json-glib/1.4/json-glib-1.4.0.tar.xz (160K) sha256sum: 9e7d14e5a09a44fcbddf57ce8f1faa8380521639884c8252ea5866a95df37079 ___ release-team@gnome.org

libepoxy 1.4.2

ChangeLog = commit abe6a80412891cd9cfdb22a66a2b2a773fc4eb3b Author: Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gnome.org> Date: Sun Apr 30 16:36:25 2017 +0100 Release Epoxy 1.4.2 configure.ac | 2 +- meson.build | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

libepoxy 1.4.1

ChangeLog = commit 5564f9d28de46b2e1236dd7252549698efe66d8a Author: Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gnome.org> Date: Thu Mar 2 18:26:58 2017 + Release Epoxy 1.4.1 (stable) configure.ac | 2 +- meson.build | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

graphene 1.6.0

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.6/graphene-1.6.0.tar.xz (411K) sha256sum: c3a9910f8dd298c1459d1f3c699ddf2e7440f9e561bfcbef59ae784400e27b5d ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

libepoxy 1.4.0

ChangeLog = https://download.gnome.org/sources/libepoxy/1.4/libepoxy-1.4.0.changes (150K) Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/libepoxy/1.4/libepoxy-1.4.0.tar.xz (750K) sha256sum: 25a906b14a921bc2b488cfeaa21a00486fe92630e4a9dd346e4ecabeae52ab41

graphene 1.5.4

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.5/graphene-1.5.4.tar.xz (406K) sha256sum: 4c1dde7375e81d36cd55c22ce0469985a946e421d239a766874ba9b7dc9981f2 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

graphene 1.5.2

Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.5/graphene-1.5.2.tar.xz (121K) sha256sum: 4b2fe2c3aad43416bb520e2b3f0e1f4535b0fa722291a14904b01765afe9416f ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: GNOME 3.21.91

Hi; will do later tonight. Ciao, Emmanuele. On 2 September 2016 at 17:26, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi > > 2016-09-02 1:16 GMT+02:00 Matthias Clasen : >> Hi, >> >> GNOME 3.21.91 is now available. This is our second beta release on the > > I notice

graphene 1.4.0

ChangeLog = https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.4/graphene-1.4.0.changes (56.9K) Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.4/graphene-1.4.0.tar.xz (463K) sha256sum: 7c1ed68e7a6d1d4e804fc69b4b55ebe5a019fc5b3dfe86cd2843a27880eed6de

Re: GNOME Continuous and build breakage

rdón <jjar...@gnome.org> wrote: > On 16 December 2015 at 18:29, Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all; >>> >>> I've been meaning to discuss this wi

GNOME Continuous and build breakage

Hi all; I've been meaning to discuss this with the release team for a while, and I probably already annoyed a bunch of people on IRC, so here goes. I'd like the r-t to give its blessing to volunteers that decide to act as "build sheriffs" on Continuous builds. If we exclude the issues with the

graphene 1.2.8

ChangeLog = commit 9b9d8a187fd7af9b81a09a7797fedb749b4e40a6 Author: Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gnome.org> Date: Thu Sep 10 11:19:19 2015 +0100 Release Graphene 1.2.8 (stable) configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

String change in Clutter master and Cogl branching

Hi all; since we're in string change announcement period: I've just pushed commit: https://git.gnome.org/browse/clutter/commit/?id=38e983b8e9e2b433ef6ba930dca9096958bae697 which fixes a typo in the API reference description of a property. This kind of translation is basically invisible to

graphene 1.2.6

ChangeLog = commit d0d9772290f70132341709fcc678fb1e2937e538 Author: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gnome.org Date: Fri Aug 14 15:55:48 2015 +0100 Release Graphene 1.2.6 configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) commit

graphene 1.2.4

ChangeLog = https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.2/graphene-1.2.4.changes (225K) Download https://download.gnome.org/sources/graphene/1.2/graphene-1.2.4.tar.xz (398K) sha256sum: 50791cce509bc67ffc72dad8db29c46f284fd99e1784753e612702179d1aedef

Re: Death of gnome-common

Hi; On 23 June 2015 at 23:41, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote: Hey Emmanuele, Philip On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 17:08 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: that's usually better replaced by: autoreconf -if || exit $? test -n $NOCONFIGURE ./configure $@ Which isn't shorter, but it's

Re: Death of gnome-common

Hi Philip; that's usually better replaced by: autoreconf -if || exit $? test -n $NOCONFIGURE ./configure $@ Which isn't shorter, but it's pretty much to the point and works fine in jhbuild and autobuilders. Ciao, Emmanuele. On 23 June 2015 at 16:54, Philip Chimento

[gnome-dictionary] Created branch gnome-3-16

The branch 'gnome-3-16' was created pointing to: 5f01dbe... app: Remove compilation warnings ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Clutter branched for GNOME 3.16

Hi all; I've pushed the clutter-1.22 branch to the git.gnome.org repository. This branch will be used for GNOME 3.16 releases. The master branch is open for GNOME 3.18. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- https://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] ___

Re: possible changes in gtk translations

Hi; On 2 March 2015 at 19:55, Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net wrote: Le lundi 02 mars 2015 à 08:13 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: Right, it doesn't work with intltool. Claude, can damned-lies be made to generate

Re: String break request for GNOME Dictionary

Hi Piotr; On 23 February 2015 at 15:25, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-02-23 16:19 GMT+01:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com: Hi all; I have opened bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745022 which aims at dropping deprecated API from the Dictionary application

String break request for GNOME Dictionary

Hi all; I have opened bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745022 which aims at dropping deprecated API from the Dictionary application. The changes include dropping stock labels, which means introducing our own strings — which is actually good, because finally it allows us to avoid

Change in the Clutter Git repository

hi all; sorry for the cross-posting, but I wanted to notify all the relevant stakeholders of this. for the past couple of years, Clutter has been developed off of a topic branch, while master has been reserved to the development of the API-incompatible 2.0 series. since the 2.0 series will

string freeze break request for epiphany

hi all; I filed this bug[0] for epiphany to update the incognito mode string to include a warning about the fact that browsing incognito won't prevent other actors from tracking your activity. I think it's a good thing to notify the users about this detail, and other browsers do the same. there

Re: string freeze break request for epiphany

: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: hi all; I filed this bug[0] for epiphany to update the incognito mode string to include a warning about the fact that browsing incognito won't prevent other actors from tracking your activity. I think it's a good thing

Re: [pango] 1.36.4

hi Behdad; On 23 June 2014 22:59, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: Ugh. Wish I had in mind that a release is coming. My bad. I changed API in harfbuzz master, which broken Pango build. ebassi updated Pango and required harfbuzz 0.9.25, which does NOT have the API change. I was

Re: A first look at 3.10 blockers

hi Matthias; we probably want to add: Bug 705915 - Support high dpi displays https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705915 to the list of blockers for 3.10. I already have a working patch for X11 (need to hook up the xsetting code so that I can get the scaling factor from the system),

Re: Merging wip/clutter-1.99 in master

12:51, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: hi all; executive summary: last night I finally rebased the preliminary 1.99 branch on top of current master, and I'm planning to switch master to it on Monday, barring unforeseen complications. the wip/clutter-1.99 branch contains the initial

Re: Fallback mode is going away - what now ?

hi; On 21 November 2012 14:05, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:17:16AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: We haven't made a final decision yet on how to let users turn on this 'classic mode' - it may be a switch in gnome-tweak-tool or something else. I'm wondering

Re: Fallback mode is going away - what now ?

hi Andre; On 21 November 2012 13:27, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Can we make testing beta versions (and porting extensions to the next major version of GNOME) more attractive / easier for extension authors? Have Shell maintainers published info on Code changes which may affect

Clutter branched for 3.6

hey all; I branched Clutter 1.12 a while ago for 3.6 - the branch name is clutter-1.12. development for 1.14 will continue on master until the wip/clutter-1.99 branch is merged and the work on 2.0 will move there. I'll send another email when I branch master for 1.14. Clutter 2.0 will probably