to hold the patch any more ;-)
>
>and I want to know Debian's next release would still use k3b master
>(dependence on kdelib4) or just update to KF5 branch?
>
>I prefer to make a tag v2.9.90 for KF5 branch, is that OK?
>
>在 2016年07月15日 09:59, Scott Kitterman 写道:
>> I
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:01:47 PM Luca Beltrame wrote:
> Il Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:18:01 -0700, Eric Hameleers ha scritto:
> > No, of course not. I consider the git branch to be in eternal flux. The
> > git HEAD may contain valuable usability patches but also other meh stuff
>
> Thanks to
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 20:54:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 16 de juliol de 2014, a les 16:50:18,
grantksupp...@operamail.com
va escriure:
Anyone has another suggestion?
Do we go with KDE Applications $YEAR.$MONTH?
.MM so it's completely obvious?
e.g.,
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 14:38:01 Martin Graesslin wrote:
...
I think it's great that Kubuntu does downstream testing. But what would be
much better is if Kubuntu would do the testing upstream. E.g. I'm sometimes
too scared to take a patch into the branch as it doesn't get tested. Thus
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:32:49 Mario Fux wrote:
Good morning crowd
Looks like we've more or less an agreement or idea that could work for most
of us.
- Monthly features releases of KF5 with keyword for bugs to backport.
- 6/12 monthly (still to be decided) stable branches (with
On May 20, 2014 4:19:26 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 19:07:41 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
snip
Now, I think we'll have to agree to disagree on something. You
believe
there's some rule
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 13:28:29 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:19:59 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On May 20, 2014 4:19:26 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 19:07:41 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 08:04:59 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 22:28:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Speaking as a packager for a distro that's in group #2, I don't see this
as
any change from your initial proposal.
That's correct...
You're proposal moves us into group #1
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 14:07:02 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:55:26 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm open to discussing change, but so far the change is You're on your
own, get over it. Not a lot to discuss in that.
It's not at all the way it's been thought, it is unfortunate
On May 20, 2014 8:27:39 AM EDT, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 08:00:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 08:04:59 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 22:28:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Speaking as a packager for a distro that's in group #2, I don't
On May 20, 2014 8:52:30 AM EDT, Mario Fux kde...@unormal.org wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2014, 14.09:18 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Morning Scott
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 14:07:02 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:55:26 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm open to discussing change, but so
that happen.
anyways, on to Scott's (re-)proposal:
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 09:45:36 Scott Kitterman wrote:
This or something very like it was already suggested by someone else,
so I'm
not claiming this as my idea, but I think a reasonable compromise
would be
something like:
- Monthly feature
On May 20, 2014 10:41:04 AM EDT, Frank Reininghaus frank7...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-20 13:19 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman:
We've pushed nearly every point release to end users throughout the
KDE4 cycle. I use them myself. Your characterization of the KDE4 point
releases doesn't match my
On Monday, May 19, 2014 15:18:49 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello all,
First of all, my apologies for the long time taken for me to send an email.
So, this release cycle proposal generated more debate among our dear
packagers than we anticipated. I tried to keep up with the thread, but too
be
On May 4, 2014 4:25:25 AM EDT, Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 21:56:12 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:35:54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 19:23:07 Scott Kitterman wrote:
For non-rolling distros, at some point
On May 1, 2014 4:06:07 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 15:36:10 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:16:48 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I get what you're asking for.
What I'm trying to make clear is you aren't going to get
On April 30, 2014 3:32:02 AM EDT, Mario Fux kde...@unormal.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2014, 04.20:21 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez
Meyer:
Morning
For Ubuntu I can use the Firefox example. So can you explain why
is KF5
different than firefox?
Firefox (and Chromium too)
On April 30, 2014 6:26:14 AM EDT, Àlex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 12:04:15 Raymond Wooninck wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 11:28:26 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
Having a release every month will allow distributions to package
fresher
versions of frameworks since we
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:15:34 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 21:54:17 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On April 29, 2014 7:30:50 PM EDT, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 d'abril de 2014, a les 19:23:07, Scott Kitterman va
escriure:
On April 29, 2014 2
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:35:54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 19:23:07 Scott Kitterman wrote:
For non-rolling distros, at some point you have to stop and release. A mix
of new features and bug fixes aren't going to be allowed in.
We (Kubuntu) have been delivering KDE
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 14:39:31 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:24:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:35:54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 19:23:07 Scott Kitterman wrote:
For non-rolling distros, at some point you have
On April 30, 2014 9:56:30 AM EDT, Àlex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 07:50:02 Scott Kitterman wrote:
The difference is that you will do proper testing with all the QA in
place on
each distros, we don't have such thing upstream beyond the tests.
As for the mess
On April 29, 2014 2:07:52 PM EDT, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 d'abril de 2014, a les 19:55:42, Andreas K. Huettel va
escriure:
El Dimarts, 29 d'abril de 2014, a les 15:04:59, Andreas K. Huettel
va
escriure:
Practically this just means that what used to be the
On April 29, 2014 7:30:50 PM EDT, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 d'abril de 2014, a les 19:23:07, Scott Kitterman va
escriure:
On April 29, 2014 2:07:52 PM EDT, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 d'abril de 2014, a les 19:55:42, Andreas K. Huettel
va
On Sunday, November 03, 2013 18:00:54 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 03 November 2013 16.52.57 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org
[...]
The tarballs for the 4.11.3 release are now available in the usual
location.
I've not compiled them
On Friday, April 26, 2013 03:27:40 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi,
tldr
Let's make 4.11 the last feature release for platform and workspace in the 4
series, make 4.11 a long term maintainance release.
/tldr
I would like to propose the following for our release planning in the next
year:
Jos Poortvliet j...@opensuse.org wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 20:55:22 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2012 12:24:18 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 02:41:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Assuming 4.10.1 and 4.10.2 slip similarly, that would result
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 01:18:06 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday, December 28, 2012 21:54:17 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Seriously. I know I'm probably just putting my foot in my mouth once more
here, but:
What are betas and rc's for, if not for stabilizing code and progressing
On Friday, November 16, 2012 03:15:13 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
** NEW TARBALLS **
- nepomuk-widgets
* To be honest i'm not sure what it's for, i'd say compile it after
nepomuk- core (early in the process and you should be safe)
This one is missing it's COPYING file(s).
Scott K
On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 09:45:59 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 5 de setembre de 2012, a les 21:06:55, Martin Graesslin va
escriure:
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 22:41:10 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Hi KDE Packagers,
unfortunately we have introduced a nasty regression
On Friday, August 17, 2012 12:17:07 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
And related to the second:
* What should we package with the tarball of oxygen-icons for KDE SC
4.9.1?
Yes. Please.
Because of the way it's maintained/released we've sometimes had problems
around .3/4 of a release and
Please release it for 4.9.x as has been done in the past.
Scott K
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 16 d'agost de 2012, a les 18:37:01, Scott Kitterman va
escriure:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 12:17:07 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
And related to the second:
* What
On Sunday, August 05, 2012 09:11:11 PM Balcaen John wrote:
Le dimanche 5 août 2012 23:09:17 Dirk Mueller a écrit :
[...]
Hi,
Hello,
I've fixed kde-l10n-da and kde-l10n-pl:
b062732d0a0847a04a9860455eb9e3c5 kde-l10n-da-4.8.5.tar.xz
i've got an issue here :
On Thursday, August 02, 2012 11:00:39 AM Dirk Müller wrote:
On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Rather than build everything twice, I decided to wait for the new kdelibs
tarball. Once that's up, I'll rebuild everything against that and report
back if I see issues
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 08:21:11 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Spoke with Vishesh, we found out this was part of the KDE/4.8 vs KDE/4.8.x
vs master vs KDE/4.9 issue in kdelibs and the commit[s] requiring that has
been reverted.
Dirk, please respin the kdelibs tarballs for 4.8.5
Rather than
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 08:21:11 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Spoke with Vishesh, we found out this was part of the KDE/4.8 vs KDE/4.8.x
vs master vs KDE/4.9 issue in kdelibs and the commit[s] requiring that has
been reverted.
Dirk, please respin the kdelibs tarballs for 4.8.5
Excellent
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 02:47:11 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
...
Still missing kdemultimedia when I looked earlier today as well.
...
Nevermind. I see it's there now as Dirk said in his mail.
Scott K
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
On Monday, July 30, 2012 07:54:56 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I have packaged up the current KDE/4.8 branches as KDE 4.8.5 tarballs and
uploaded it to the usual location, which hopefully resolves all the
regressions in 4.8.4.
I am a bit late, as I was busy and then sickleaving last week,
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:14:12 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
--- El mar, 17/7/12, Myriam Schweingruber escribió:
Hi all,
I was made aware today that, unlike beta releases, RC
releases seem
not to be announced on the packagers list. Is there a reason
for that?
What's the need of
On Friday, July 13, 2012 07:44:38 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture
is
all
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:50:01 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Do you really think forcing an update of unchanged modules for our
convenience will help those of us trying to use plasma for mobile devices?
That's the work of the distributor for those mobile devices.
I think you're missing
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 07:48:53 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2012 19:43:54 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
So you will have a one-time task to set up the distribution build system
to
create these packages. What I do not understand is why having particular
frameworks skip a
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 09:30:51 PM Michael Jansen wrote:
The one real world experience we have with this is kdepim. From my
perspective as a packager the entire transition has been a disaster and
created huge work for us (shortly before our KDE 4.7 based release I was
doing almost
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 05:01:58 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am 05.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Dirk Mueller:
Hi,
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5
release. Does
anyone have suggestions for a release plan?
I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 11:44:12 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
On 07/05/2012 11:31 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 05:01:58 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am 05.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Dirk Mueller:
Hi,
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5
release
On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 07:30:23 PM Michael Jansen wrote:
...
I am just wondering about the distros again. Say i release KDE SC 4.9.2 and
of all our packages only 10% got really changes. I wonder how that affects
the workload if we force a release of the 90% unchanged ones. Or do they
need
On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 07:25:13 PM Michael Jansen wrote:
I do not disagree here, BUT have in mind that since we have private
packages (used/tested by distro packagers before the release actually
happens) so YOU is a broad term including the packagers.
For KDE would say someone
On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 07:14:40 PM Michael Jansen wrote:
The last step is done in maven because the support something called
snapshot release which means their version looks like
4.7.1-20120621_151400. I think it could make sense to support that
too. Stuff build from master or
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:31:18 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Vishesh fixed the KDE/4.8.x branch of kdelibs. Can you guys verify it also
fixes the issues for you?
If so, what's the next step? Release an early 4.8.5? Repackage 4.8.4
kdelibs?
Ideas?
Call it 4.8.4.1 and add it to the
On Monday, June 11, 2012 07:20:50 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 01:22:03 Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Why not start now and make the next kdelibs 4.8.5? Releasing a kdelibs
4.9 will just add to the confusion of how kdelibs
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 12:56:36 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 00:11:32, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so
I
had to copy/paste from the web archive.
On Monday, June 04, 2012 00:52
Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so I
had to copy/paste from the web archive.
On Monday, June 04, 2012 00:52:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My proposal:
**
The KDE Release Team recognizes the importance of making a
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va
escriure:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not
respecting
the dependency freeze.
Oh by the way, this is not
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
OK, since a lot of context apparently got lost during the message
passing, let
me just state my (personal) position clearly:
What I think is acceptable:
* Module X wants feature Y, which is non-invasive and well-tested and
does not
change the user
Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:12:07 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Source compatibility and proper soname management. As long as sonames
are
bumped for BIC changes I think it's manageable.
We're not planning to weaken the existing rules, if any changes violate
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 08:16:39 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing this email from the Platform11 sprint in Randa, and I'd like to
collect input how we can get the different needs of developers and
packagers together.
Let me quickly outline the situation. There has been a
Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 09:22:05 Scott Kitterman wrote:
For kdelibs, it is essential that the interfaces that will be newly
exposed
be managed properly. By there will be interfaces that are now
private
within kdelibs that will be exposed to the public
On Monday, May 30, 2011 10:32:57 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
CC'ing release-team and kde-pim back. The people who can properly answer
these concerns are not subscribed to kde-packager.
Raymond Wooninck tittiatc...@gmail.com writes:
On Monday 30 May 2011 09:40:46 Scott Kitterman wrote
58 matches
Mail list logo
