Ok, so the final schedule is here
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
It has the same dates as the one sent by Allen a few months ago with the
exception of the clarification that we'll release Betas, RCs as soon as
possible after the tags and the shortening of time
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:14:01 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Ok, so the final schedule is here
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
It has the same dates as the one sent by Allen a few months ago with the
exception of the clarification that we'll release
El Dijous, 7 de març de 2013, a les 01:48:30, David Edmundson va escriure:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 6 de març de 2013, a les 14:52:07, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 7 de març de 2013, a les 01:48:30, David Edmundson va escriure:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
wrote:
El Dimecres, 6 de març de 2013, a les 14:52:07, Vishesh Handa va
El Dimecres, 6 de març de 2013, a les 14:52:07, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A few months ago we were discussing changes regarding 4.11
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2013-January/006708.html
The changes I
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 6 de març de 2013, a les 14:52:07, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A few months ago we were discussing changes regarding 4.11
On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 00:43:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'm a bit unsure about 1, 2 and 5. Anyone has extra opinions to share? I'd
like to have a finalized schedule for 4.11 next week.
In this case my silence was really a I have no opposition to the proposal,
so go ahead and put me as a
A few months ago we were discussing changes regarding 4.11
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2013-January/006708.html
The changes I suggested where
***
1) Drop Betas to 1
It doesn't seem to me that having extra betas gives us much more
quality,
so my suggestion is
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19.06:52 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4) Don't release if any
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 20:36:48, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19.06:52 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Monday 21 January 2013 21.52:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 20:36:48, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19.06:52 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 18 de
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:21:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I think that the 4.11 cycle was not optimal, but I think it is because
it
overlapps with Christmas and New Year.
Why was that suboptimal? We've been having that since all the 4.x.odd
releases
I have the feeling that we
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:21:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I think that the 4.11 cycle was not optimal, but I think it is because
it
overlapps with Christmas and New Year.
Why was that suboptimal? We've been
On Sunday 20 January 2013 11:55:00 David Edmundson wrote:
So I did that - result is attached and it doesn't tell me anything except
that in the 4.10 cycle significantly less bugs have been created than in
the other cycles.
Have you taken into account that the CONFIRMED status changed to
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 03:13:05, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23.27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure:
I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4) Don't release if any if the tests are failing in builds.kde.org
If we have tests, they have to work
I have mixed feelings about that.
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 19:37:52, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available
On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4) Don't release if any if the tests are failing in builds.kde.org
If we have
El Dissabte, 19 de gener de 2013, a les 19:06:52, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4)
,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program)
Please review and report back any obvious problems, for example
conflicts with conferences
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4) Don't release if any if the tests are failing in builds.kde.org
If we have tests, they have to work
I have mixed feelings about that. Personally I agree completely, but I fear
that this will end in less unit tests than in
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment
1) Drop Betas to 1
It doesn't seem to me that having extra betas gives us much more
quality, so my suggestion is to drop Beta 2 and move Beta 1 to
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 14.22.23 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment
1) Drop Betas to 1
It doesn't seem to me that having extra betas gives us much
El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 15:06:05, Torgny Nyblom va escriure:
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 14.22.23 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment
1) Drop
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program)
Please review and report back any obvious problems, for example
conflicts with conferences (i.e. Akademy
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program)
Please review
On 16/01/2013 09:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
4) Don't release if any if the tests are failing in builds.kde.org
If we have tests, they have to work
Please do. Having a broken test suite is worse than having none at all,
and it's not difficult to disable certain tests that the
On , Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va
escriure:
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program
29 matches
Mail list logo
