El dilluns, 7 d’agost de 2017, a les 9:46:59 CEST, Rex Dieter va escriure:
> David Faure wrote:
> > On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> David Faure wrote:
> >> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases
> >> > of Qt5.x, it is time now for
David Faure wrote:
> On lundi 7 août 2017 18:25:35 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
>> David Faure wrote:
>> >> > Isn't it an option to leave it in, at version 5.36, rather than
>> >> > removing it completely ?
>> >>
>> >> In the short-term, yes.
>> >>
>> >> Long term, I'm not willing to ship (and
On lundi 7 août 2017 18:25:35 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> >> > Isn't it an option to leave it in, at version 5.36, rather than
> >> > removing it completely ?
> >>
> >> In the short-term, yes.
> >>
> >> Long term, I'm not willing to ship (and support) this if it's not
> >>
David Faure wrote:
>> > Isn't it an option to leave it in, at version 5.36, rather than
>> > removing it completely ?
>>
>> In the short-term, yes.
>>
>> Long term, I'm not willing to ship (and support) this if it's not
>> supported upstream either (where bugs are usually fixed in newer
>>
On lundi 7 août 2017 17:36:05 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> > On lundi 7 août 2017 16:46:59 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> David Faure wrote:
> >> > On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> >> David Faure wrote:
> >> >> > According to the policy that KF5 should
David Faure wrote:
> On lundi 7 août 2017 16:46:59 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
>> David Faure wrote:
>> > On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
>> >> David Faure wrote:
>> >> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3
>> >> > releases of Qt5.x, it is time now for
On lundi 7 août 2017 16:46:59 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> > On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> David Faure wrote:
> >> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases
> >> > of Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to
David Faure wrote:
> On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
>> David Faure wrote:
>> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases
>> > of Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support
>> > for Qt 5.6.
>> >
>> > Packagers: is that
On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:57:31 CEST Christoph Feck wrote:
> On 02.08.2017 22:47, David Faure wrote:
> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> > Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt
> > 5.6.
> >
> > Packagers: is that
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, David Faure wrote:
According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt 5.6.
Packagers: is that acceptable?
Normally I would have just gone ahead with applying the policy, but
On 08/02/17 22:47, David Faure wrote:
> According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt 5.6.
>
> Packagers: is that acceptable?
We already have 5.9.1 in our repos and thus also have no problem
On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 22:47, David Faure wrote:
> According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt
> 5.6.
> Packagers: is that acceptable?
Certainly no objection from Gentoo. Qt 5.7.1 is
Le 2017-08-02 22:47, David Faure a écrit :
According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases
of
Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for
Qt 5.6.
Packagers: is that acceptable?
Normally I would have just gone ahead with applying the policy,
Also fine for FreeBSD, where on 5.7.1.
mfg Tobias
On 4 August 2017 at 10:09, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 02, 2017 22:47 CEST, David Faure
> wrote:
>
> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> > Qt5.x,
On Wednesday, August 02, 2017 22:47 CEST, David Faure wrote:
> According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt 5.6.
>
> Packagers: is that acceptable?
Works for OpenMandriva.
On mercredi 2 août 2017 22:55:10 CEST Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> > According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> > Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt
> > 5.6.
> >
> > Packagers: is that acceptable?
>
> I'd prefer
On 02.08.2017 22:47, David Faure wrote:
According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt 5.6.
Packagers: is that acceptable?
Normally I would have just gone ahead with applying the policy, but
David Faure wrote:
> According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
> Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt
> 5.6.
>
> Packagers: is that acceptable?
I'd prefer to continue to allow 5.6 awhile, to continue to allow support for
rhel
According to the policy that KF5 should work with the last 3 releases of
Qt5.x, it is time now for upcoming releases of KF5 to drop support for Qt 5.6.
Packagers: is that acceptable?
Normally I would have just gone ahead with applying the policy, but after my
recent finding that even some very
19 matches
Mail list logo