Good Morning Tom,
I would have to run the driver just about on full bore though.
(because of the 30 in 100 out amp...again only running it right now at
75 watts) I am a little nervous on running it like that. I wonder if
anyone else is running the driver that hard and getting good results??
In Class C operation, especially when considering repeater operation,
its way better to run an appropriate sized amplifier full bore than it
is to run a bigger amp at 1/2 or 1/3 its rating. Class C amps run
cleaner when properly (over) driven, as they will get spurious when
under driven.
I have a question that I hope you guys who have been at this a lot longer than
me can answer.
Let's say a set of manuals for a 20-year-old piece of Motorola equipment are
still available from Big-M for a price of $120 plus shipping. (I checked price
and availability this morning.)
Let's say
A set of manuals for what piece of equipment?
Neil - WA6KLA
Bob Burns K4RXR wrote:
I have a question that I hope you guys who have been at this a lot
longer than me can answer.
Let's say a set of manuals for a 20-year-old piece of Motorola
equipment are still available from
At 08:44 AM 3/3/05, you wrote:
I have a question that I hope you guys who have been at this a lot longer than
me can answer.
Let's say a set of manuals for a 20-year-old piece of Motorola equipment are
still available from Big-M for a price of $120 plus shipping. (I checked price
and
Lets put another one to rest.
WRITE IT IN STONE! the Micor, at least those with the Transmitter
FCC Identifier of CC4224C are Part 95 type accepted. This is the
transmitter on my Micor Community Repeater.
Here is my journey to this data.
I had sent a letter to the FCC Field office back in
A couple of years ago, I went to a local ham radio swapmeet and
found a couple of GE test sets. One for a Mastr-pro ... the other
for a Mastr II ... got them both for $5.00 each.
Neil - WA6KLA
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
At 08:44 AM 3/3/05, you wrote:
I have a question that I
We just checked the FCC list and it is not there we call the
FCC and they do not know any thing about this.We where told today that it
is not true. "These older radio's are NOT FCC type certified for use today on
GMRS under part 95".
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group
...and thoughts usually turn to lightning and grounding issues as well as RF in
the shack.
I co-moderate a group whose subject is just that hamgrounding
It is currently a small group with low to moderate traffic. Please feel free
to join and keep discussions on topic.
Anyone shed some light on these? Will they go down with or without
tuning to 441 MHz? Et.?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 3/2/2005
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web,
In a message dated 3/3/05 5:13:47 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We just checked the FCC list and it is not there we call the FCC and they do not know any thing about this.We where told today that it is not true. "These older radio's are NOT FCC type certified for
Hey Doug,
Do you have the names and contact info?
I myself have 3 Micors with the same TX number it would be great to use
them. Or I was going to sell them and up grade to some thing I could use.
Kathy, AB2LF, WPYM-499 has a new Kenwood Systems 50 watt GMRS repeater that
talks (ARcom controller)
At 02:03 PM 3/3/05, you wrote:
We
just checked the FCC list and it is not there we call the FCC and they do
not know any thing about this. We where told today that it is not true.
These older radio's are NOT FCC type certified for use today on
GMRS under part 95.
U.
If I remember
It's my opinion that some of you worry too much.
Just a few thoughts...
Original type certified equipment still operating within
the current legal specifications are not a major concern
with Inspection Officials (FCC and others) I've had
interactions with. I've even had them quickly pass
Russ,
The webpage is live now.
It is a view of page 302 of the Radio Equiment List From 1983.
www.digio1.com/cgrg/micor.html
Doug
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Doug,
Do you have the names and contact info?
I myself have 3 Micors with the
Were you told they don't know
anything about this or that "These older radio's are NOT FCC type certified for use today on
GMRS under part 95". Your reply is ambiguous and it seems very incorrect
since this other gent has it in writing from the FCC that they ARE type
accepted.
If you
Dont forget BAKER 2 VEGAS it is also comming up fast.
Anyone from the list going up to support any of your local teams?
73's bob kd6gnb
___
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month
Hi Skipp,if you stll want it,$50 shipped. I just found out I will be
forced to go on disability due to back problems,so everything will have
to go. 73,Lee
skipp025 wrote:
Yep,
A specific callsign and operational changes are
noted using the book information. The changes
are programmed into
Kevin,
Have you or anyone else figured out where to cut a Micor PA board
and modify for a 50 ohm output what is remaining to be able to use
the same board but at a lower power?
Ie: take a 100 watt PA Board, cut off the 4 transistor finals and
use the driver stage?
Neil -
The first radios I ever saw on those frequencies were made by
Vocaline (sp?) and the radio service was known as Class 'A' Citizens
Band.
Long before GMRS came along ...
This was in the late fifties I believe.
Neil - WA6KLA
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
At 02:03 PM 3/3/05,
Only 22 years old?
My earliest Motorola Manual is dated 4/46.
Have another one that says on the bottom of the cover page
Motorola Inc. formerly Galvin Manufacturing, Inc (?) on it.
Neil - WA6KLA
Doug D. wrote:
and appears to be a pack rat... keeping older manuals and
If your question mark was questioning that name, Motorola is the third
generation Galvin company. The second generation company was Galvin
Manufacturing. I don't recall what the first was. I know the first
company made car heaters. The second company was started after the first
failed, and
Not to get into a rules debate... BUT...
Just because a radio was once type accepted doesn't
mean it STILL is for a particular service.
Not saying the Micor falls into this category, but it might.
If a radio used to be TA'ed in 1961, it doesn't mean you can still use
it today. So, the old TA
WHEN did they lose the type acceptance? I'll bet that question can't be
answered.
-- Original Message --
Received: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:03:46 PM CST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not know any thing about this. We where told today that it is not true.
These older radio's are NOT FCC type
24 matches
Mail list logo
