Hi guys .I have the above diplexer and i am concerned about the amount of power loss i am getting .I have 18watts going into the tx port on 78.1375mhz and only 7-8 watts coming out the antenna .Rx frequency is 80.6375mhz .I t was tuned up by a firm here in queensland
Thank You,
Ian
as info I got from the factory NO. never been set up for that.
- Original Message -
From: ochf13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 12:14 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Newer IC-FR3000 program in the HAM Bands?
Hello,
Will the
I have one(Bridgecom) VHF unit here I ordered for a person in Dec 2005 or
Jan of this year I would sell for $900. with shipping cost. It will come
programmed on your freg. and also will come with the programming software
and cable.
thanks John
- Original Message -
From: Dick
Ian,
Interestingly the RF Solutions web site does not
list the insertion loss for the CP 70 series duplexers. Looking further
thru the pdf I find that the Cp145 series at 144-174 has a 2 dB insertion
loss. Even assuming 3dB loss in the cavities you have what appears to be
excessive loss,
I found a link to the information and it says 1db loss and the measurements were taken into a wavteck service monitor
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
---Original Message---
From: Ellen Engle
Date: 05/06/06 22:51:11
To:
http://www2.rfsworld.com/RFS_Edition3/pdfs/Duplexers_755-776.pdf
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
---Original Message---
From: Ellen Engle
Date: 05/06/06 22:51:11
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Ian,
The RFS/Celwave CP70-422N
duplexer is a good product, but you might contact Celwave regarding the 2.5 MHz
split you're using. Some duplexer designs don't necessarily work better
with wider splits. The CP70 duplexer is specified for a 600 kHz split, and
its loop settings might not be
The notch caps have been modified by the tech to suit the 2.5 meg split so I hope it is ok but I hope to be checking with rfs Australia on Monday but I did talk to one of their guys on Friday and they said it would work ok with the 2.5 meg split but the real expert on them wasnt available
At 5/6/2006 19:14, you wrote:
This guy has it right !
John VE3AMZ
D-Subminiature Nomenclature
Having seen too many references to a DB-9 connector, I have compiled the
following information in the hope that it might make for more accurate
discourse. For all the projects that call for a
9 matches
Mail list logo
