On 4/15/07, N9WYS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so Skipp... Seems to me I remember that there is some law on
the books that requires a manufacturer to provide parts support for their
product for 7 years. I wish I could find it...
I checked Google for 7-year support and got about 1200
So we're going to need/use a repeater receiver for the project
using a converted commercial two-way radio. In some cases the
same radio will duplex (transmit and receive) within the same
case/chassis. Many radios duplex with various modifications,
which are available on web pages.
Some
I have a Brady ID-Pro and a Brady TLS2200, the former of which has seen
better days. Unless you have a financially-viable reason to spend the money
on a wire labeler, you're probably better off buying sheets of
laser-printable wire labels. They come in regular 8.5x11 sheets. You can
get
Paul M Schmitter wrote:
Thank you for all the info. Part 95 is not written
very clearly. There seem to be many interpretations.
In talking with several different officials of the FCC, this is done
purposely so the rules can be bent to fit situations. If the rules were
cut-n-dry, there would
Are you talking about Part 95 or Part 97?
Joe M.
Kevin Custer wrote:
Paul M Schmitter wrote:
Thank you for all the info. Part 95 is not written
very clearly. There seem to be many interpretations.
In talking with several different officials of the FCC, this is done
purposely so the
I had a few GM300's VHF laying around the house for a few years. Got my
ham ticket back in the winter and have been trying to make a 2meter
repeater. Got em programmed with out any problems, ordered a cable that
plugs into the 16 pin connection of one and into the mic slot of
another. I'm
Kevin,
I think our Micor must have been properly converted because it has been
on the air for about 25 years according to the original owner who I talk
with 2 weeks ago. Our Micro is on 2 meters and has a 70 cm receiver in
the cabinet who's frequency I don't know. Need to find that out!!
KD5SFA wrote:
'retuned as receiver'..may be that it is tuned elsewhere
and it was just a radio laying around to be used as a
inexpensive receiver...by no means does it imply it is
being used on FRS frequencies.
Jon
Yes it does. There are no mods for FRS radios to put them anywhere other
What's being done to ID the repeater?
Chas, KS3Z
--- Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a few GM300's VHF laying around the house for
a few years. Got my
ham ticket back in the winter and have been trying
to make a 2meter
repeater. Got em programmed with out any problems,
ordered a
Paul M Schmitter wrote:
Running it on GMRS. The way I read the rules, a GMRS
repeater can be 50 watts. The frequency of a FRS radio
can be adjusted slightly to fall into the GMRS
frequecies and since it's only for receive there is no
type acceptance issue.
Ok-but I don't know how you did
Bob Linda Smith wrote:
Dear Chuck and everyone else who gave valuable suggestions,
It looks like I, and the club, need to rethink this question. I am very
impressed with some of the new equipment out there and was thinking our
radio is a bit outdated. Also, I was thinking of the space
rtoplus wrote:
My only response on this topic since Kevin doesn't allow rules
discussions.
GMRS is allowed up to 50 watts TPO unless you are operating a small
base station, then the 15 watt rule comes into play. A small base
station operates at 5ppm minimum frequency tolerance and a
Paul M Schmitter wrote:
Ooops. Re-read the rules. It's 15 watts for a fixed
station as long as it's not within 50 miles of Canada.
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that even with a GMRS license, power
is limited to 5W max?
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Not for FRS freqs,
Voice ID would be legal. If the regs read the same for the
repeater... the legal ID is required once at the end of the
standard 10 min talk period.
cheers,
s.
Charles Schmell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's being done to ID the repeater?
Chas, KS3Z
--- Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4/16/2007 10:21 AM, you wrote:
Bob Linda Smith wrote:
Dear Chuck and everyone else who gave valuable suggestions,
It looks like I, and the club, need to rethink this question. I am very
impressed with some of the new equipment out there and was thinking our
radio is a bit outdated.
Jim B. wrote:
KD5SFA wrote:
'retuned as receiver'..may be that it is tuned elsewhere
and it was just a radio laying around to be used as a
inexpensive receiver...by no means does it imply it is
being used on FRS frequencies.
Jon
Yes it does. There are no mods for FRS radios to put them
At 09:37 PM 04/15/07, you wrote:
Kevin,
I think our Micor must have been properly converted because it has
been on the air for about 25 years according to the original owner
who I talk with 2 weeks ago. Our Micro is on 2 meters and has a 70
cm receiver in the cabinet who's frequency I don't
I bet it was one of those compace mobile duplexers you can hold in the
palm of your hand (IOW, not large, and not heavy).
He jsut said it was in-band, and didn't specify the split.
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who/how many people carried the Duplexer?
-Original Message-
At 4/16/2007 11:45 AM, you wrote:
Who/how many people carried the Duplexer?
It was in the backpack. This was a wide-split (2.5 MHz) system, so the
duplexer was actually the lightest component. The MVP 11 AH battery were
a bit heavy to carry around, but they were manageable.
Bob NO6B
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Repeater-Builder
group.
File: /FluX Research/Open Source D-Squelch
Uploaded by : dcflux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : Discription of D-Squelch Project
You can
: G.E. MVP. I once walked a hamfest with a complete
operating in-band 2 meter MVP repeater in my backpack.
You the guy with the plastic helmet with the rubber duckie
on top..? or are you the guy with the entire tower top
mounted beam (yagi)?
:-)
s.
On 4/15/07, Bob Linda Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think our Micor must have been properly converted because it has been on
the air for about 25 years according to the original owner who I talk with 2
weeks ago. Our Micro is on 2 meters and has a 70 cm receiver in the cabinet
who's
List members,
A couple of weeks ago I was looking for comments / information on how to renew
my father's ham license. A number of you responded which I archived them into
a Word document for future reference.
I didn't have a chance to do anything with it until today. After re-reading
all of
At 4/16/2007 03:44 PM, you wrote:
: G.E. MVP. I once walked a hamfest with a complete
operating in-band 2 meter MVP repeater in my backpack.
You the guy with the plastic helmet with the rubber duckie
on top..? or are you the guy with the entire tower top
mounted beam (yagi)?
Neither. I
It is pretty straightforward these days, but it still intimidates some
people. I think a lot of the problem is that the Government has difficulty
explaining (and simplifying) things, so that puts some people off.
The last time I renewed I had to install Netscape so I could do it online,
as that
At 4/16/2007 15:22, you wrote:
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Repeater-Builder
group.
File: /FluX Research/Open Source D-Squelch
Uploaded by : dcflux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : Discription
Ken Arck wrote:
---Don't tell me that! I'm looking at a '94 Vette for my wife!
Damn good trade Sir! :-) Mike
Good thinking Bob, I will look in to it. Do you have a schematic or
the model number of the squelch you were working with?
A couple of friends in Erie were recently pulling their hair out with
a COR-2 by VHF engineering. That needed a serious redesign, not having
a pull-up resistor on the RX
Don't you just love it when an opportunity to use a line like that comes
along?
Richard
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
29 matches
Mail list logo
