Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

-Original Message- >From: Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: May 19, 2008 2:57 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link > > Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 >other than on the ARRL web site? >

Re: [Repeater-Builder] FW: Dayton and Parts you might need....

- Original Message - From: "MCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:09 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FW: Dayton and Parts you might need > Oh - there are lots of ways to him him (or her - let's be PC here). But, > enforcement is another issue entirely. By th

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control of a Fan

There are 2 circuits for fan contollers on the Repeater Builder website at http://www.repeater-builder.com/projects/project-index.html 73, George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: John Transue To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 4:5

Re: [Repeater-Builder] More on Copper theft

-Original Message- >From: DCFluX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Apr 22, 2008 10:31 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] More on Copper theft > >Most bullets these days are made of copper. > Perfect! He wants copper, we'll give him copper.. althou

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Dayton & That Pleasant Flea Market Smell

Don't forget the old military stuff with the strong vinegar-like smell of the anti-corrosive treatment, whatever it was (probably toxic/carcinogenic...) I used to have an old (WW-II) BC-639 aircraft direction finding receiver, complete with power supply, control head, headset, handset, manuals

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Yahoo burp?

-Original Message- >From: Bruce Bagwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Apr 22, 2008 10:08 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Yahoo burp? > [snip] > >Just brushing off the cinders! Sorry about the dumb post. Maybe that is a >result of Spam Filters,

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Yahoo burp?

-Original Message- >From: Bruce Bagwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Apr 8, 2008 1:05 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's [snip] This message was posted 2 WEEKS AGO Does Yahoo have the hiccups?

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Contacts at time warner to report cable leaks

Good luck: I had to call Comcast's regular customer service line to report a leak here in the Chicago suburbs... it took 3 calls and finally, a threat to call the FCC before they fixed it. They are not set up to handle complaints from anyone other than their own subscribers, and didn't really

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RIB-less cable circuitry

I have seen some Dell laptops where the serial port was disabled in the BIOS right out of the box, but still works under Windows XP. You might want to check the BIOS settings to be sure the port is actually enabled. George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "Bob M." <[EMAIL

Re: [Repeater-Builder] motorola R100 uhf repeater and the id-o-matic

404 - Not found but this worked: http://www.repeater-builder.com/motorola/r100/r100-to-csi-tp-154.pdf George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Bui

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking a Kenwood TKR-750 to an ICOM IC-F521

The connection information in the following link may prove helpful: Receive audio appears to be pin 10, not 11, and pin 16 is the PTT input for the Kenwood, not an output. You need to feed either the TOS output (pin 24) or COS output (

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using Alinco DR-605 Dual Band Mobiles for Repeater

A lot of them are Moto R1225's, CDM1250's, older R100's, GM300's , GE MASTR II's, etc. All legal. - Original Message - From: "briguy1q2w" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using Alinco DR-605 Dual Band Mobiles for Repeater

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater input getting interference FROM a TV?

Be VERY careful about doing the work on someone else's property... there are liability issues! (If their TV catches on fire down the road, guess who they'll come after) Best bet is to offer suggestions such as Jeff posted, even offer to pay for the filters, but the bottom line is that it

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Looking for Lo-Band base station

Does it have to be a Micor? Someone has a GE MASTR-II, 42-50 MHz, 80-100 W unit (according to the combo number...) on E-Bay right now, that ends today. No idea where he is located, but it's auction number 120227917513. 3 bids, and only at $30.97 with 7 hours to go... George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Mitrek tune up

-Original Message- >From: skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Mar 4, 2008 11:58 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Mitrek tune up > [snip] >Don't waste your time with trying to find an original over priced >metering box. Buy a really nice Fluke Mul

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Tone Boards

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Tone Boards > >I don't see anything like that. If anyone knows where to >get one I would sure like to have that before I order the >TS-64DS from Tessco. > >Thanks, >Vern >KI4ONW > >On Thu, 28 F

Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF ALE LQA Values

Although I am hesitant to recommend to anyone that they visit Bonnie's website because of the vast quantity of misinformation there, the technical specifications for ALE are contained in a Department of Defense document (MIL STD-188-141B) at http://hflink.com/standards/ALE_standard_188-141B.pdf

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Shameless customer recommendation for Expresspcb (Express PC Board)

Haven't used the PCB side, but found ExpressSchematic very easy to use for several recent projects. Only thing missing was a wire selection for shielded cable... made up my own. - Original Message - From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:40 PM S

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 transmitter

I have a couple of Johnson PPL 6060's... 15-20 watt crystal-controlled. $25.00 each, shipped. - Original Message - From: Howard Klino To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 7:16 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 440 transmitter Looking for a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] looking for a UHF repeater

There are several on E-Bay right now, including a new Ritron being sold by our very own Ted, W9MDM. George, KA3HSQ / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:37 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] looking for a UHF repeater > Does

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: linking frequencies?

All the more reason to use 900 MHz drive the Part 15 stuff away! - Original Message - From: "lenaw12" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 10:02 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: linking frequencies? > "Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> 900 Mhz is optimu

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Low-band MaraTrac Squelch Pots

- Original Message - From: "Bob M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:04 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Low-band MaraTrac Squelch Pots [snip] > > I could replace the connector IF I had a part number > and IF Motorola still had one. It's an 18-pin femal

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Unknown board

The XR2206 and 2211 chips are modulator/demodulator chips... I used them to build a RTTY TU for my Radio Shack Color Computer back in '83 or so. My guess would be some sort of modem. George, KA3HSW -Original Message- >From: "Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Feb 5

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mobile Radio Building Blocks

Too bad you're ruling out a crystal rig... I have several Johnson PPL6060 rigs, which are very easy to duplex and make great low-power repeaters/exciters or full-duplex link radios. Definitely would meet the "inexpensive" part... ($25 each, shipped in the lower 48) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the Mitreks from Communications Specialists for $25.00. And .0002% channel elements are also available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX - you really only need to meet the TX stability...) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Me

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the Mitreks from Communications Specialists for $25.00. And .0002% channel elements are also available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX - you really only need to meet the TX stability...) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Me

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's

Well, that at least confirms the time frame I thought it was in one step closer, anyway. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's > At 1/19/2008 10:47, you wrote: > >>Can an

[Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's

Can anyone point me to the specific enforcement case or warning letter where the FCC first said that regular, periodic repeater ID's irrespective of repeater usage were broadcasting and had to stop? The FCC's online archives don't seem to go back far enough (seems to me it was in the 80's), and

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor power supply issue

Check Mouser (www.mouser.com)... I see several 15,000 uF caps listed, in 16, 25, 35, and 50 volt ratings. Cornell Dublier, Mallory, Sprague... all the biggies. No minimum order, either! George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "kk2ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Frida

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Signal Circuit Wanted - If Possible.

To be sure we all understand what you are trying to accomplish: are you looking for a suitable connection point for an S-meter type reading? In the Mitrek, this can be found at the metering socket, pin 1. Can't help with the Tait George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Message- >Fr

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: New QRM on 220 MHz.......?

I saw something recently on the FCC Enforcement pages about some remote sensors for traffic lights causing interference to a licensed service... turns out the units that were installed were not designed to be sold in the U.S. and were shipped to the installer by mistake. Needless to say, they

Re: [Repeater-Builder] New QRM on 220 MHz.......?

I just read on the AMSAT BB about a certain Linksys wireless access point that had a very strong spur in the 430 band, right next to one of the satellite downlink frequencies I wonder if you might be encountering one with a 224 spur? Take your laptop with WiFi and use NetStumbler to see if

Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC cordination foo

This is NOT the "official" NFCC this is a group who claims that the original NFCC was disbanded, and they have declared themselves the NEW "official" NFCC http://www.thenfcc.org/press_release_12_18_07.pdf Be interesting to see what the ARRL or the "real" NFCC has to say about this

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Which 440 Synthesized radio to use with IRLP?

The radios recommended on the IRLP site are Moto GM300, Maxtrac, or M120 with the 16-pin options connector, GE Phoenix S or SX, or Alinco DR435T (135T for 2-meters). George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "w7vtm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor conversion question

Mouser has no minimum order $$ requirement (some parts have minimum quantities, but hardly unreasonable)... and I usually receive my orders from them within 2 days. George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Message- >From: fxbuilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Dec 12, 2007 2:04 PM >To: Rep

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Need to program Micsale and Kirisun

According to Kirisun's website, they are apparently PC-programmable with the appropriate software and cable, but I'd be very leery of those radios... a $60.00, 16-channel 3.5 watt UHF HT from China may not be type-accepted, certificated, or whatever the approval process is in VE land. Down her

Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

-Original Message- >From: Paul Plack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 27, 2007 7:55 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs > >Ron, as far as I can tell from Part 97, ID may be done with any legal emission >mode for the frequency, and tone

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: AM interference on long cable run

I've had Sprint Broadband wireless for several years, and have had a static public IP address from day one George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "Jim Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:43 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: AM interf

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage

Couple of big differences between D-Star, IRLP and Echolink: With Echolink, any licensed amateur with a soundcard-equipped computer and an internet connection can connect to an Echolink-enabled repeater. With IRLP and D-Star, you can only establish a connection between repeaters over the air -

[Repeater-Builder] Nasty repeater ID...

In the course of gathering information for a complaint to the FCC about an unlicensed business repeater in downtown Chicago on GMRS, one of the members of the local GMRS group expressed his curiosity about what brand repeater we might be hearing (as well as why they needed a gain antenna and at

[Repeater-Builder] Bendix-King service manual?

Anybody got a service manual for a B-K EMV4990A? I need to locate & tweak the internal squelch pot on one that's set just a little too loose... Thanks in advance, George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control

The way most HSMM stations do - you use your callsign as the SSID of the access point, and have beaconing enabled! - Original Message - From: Paul Plack To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:15 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 questio

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Need preamp card for MSR 2000

An MSR-2000 shouldn't be difficult to narrow-band... Communications Specialists sells a kit of narrow crystal filters to fit it. I've already done one Mitrek and a Johnson PPL6060. George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control

-Original Message- >From: "Keith, KB7M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 8, 2007 11:59 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control > >This is an issue that is highly misunderstood, and commonly abused. A >"crossband

[Repeater-Builder] Fw: [illinoisdigitalham] Letter from Dennis M. @ Yaesu

- Original Message - From: "Dave Foran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:29 PM Subject: [illinoisdigitalham] Letter from Dennis M. @ Yaesu FYI Dave WB8APD >From Dennis, K7BV: Friends

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control

- Original Message - From: "MCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 5:36 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control > But again, the question is: Are EITHER of these required? > > Can the repeater be run strictly with Auto

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control

-Original Message- >From: Adam Vazquez Kb2Jpd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 7, 2007 1:50 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control > >Most 2M Repeater operators use their input free so I think you know >what t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control

-Original Message- >From: MCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 7, 2007 1:28 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control > >But where does it require a control link (AUX station) to control the >repeater? (or landline

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 222 Mhz

I've got a 110-watt MASTR-II mobile sitting out in the garage that I've been meaning to convert, but never got around to it... docs, cables, control head, the whole works. 8 channel E-series (thick profile), CG, 6 pairs of ICOMs installed. Even picked up the NHRC-VSQ (internal plug-in volume

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: UHF Radio recommendations ??

-Original Message- >From: wb6ymh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 2, 2007 10:28 AM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: UHF Radio recommendations ?? > >--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, George Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Radio recommendations ??

And the Mitrek is just about the easiest radio to convert... snip two diodes, jumper your channel elements hot full-time, disable the T/R relay & add a 2nd antenna connector, controller of your choice, and duplexer. And already in a nice, RF-tight enclosure, to boot! I picked up a 55-watter o

Re: [Repeater-Builder] pc board duplexer article

I'll scan the Dec. 2005 article tomorrow and send you both. George - Original Message - From: "Mike Morris WA6ILQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] pc board duplexer article > At 01:32 PM 11/01/07, you wrote: >>Accordin

Re: [Repeater-Builder] pc board duplexer article

According to the ARRL web site QST index search, it was April 1979, page 11. I don't have that one, but do have a copy of the 1972 6-can duplexer construction article. Somebody out there must have the QST CD-ROM that covers 1979, though George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Message

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Installation of Radio Equipment in Elevator Machine Rooms and Hoistways

Interesting... I wonder if existing equipment was grandfathered here in Illinois, or if the building where one of our machines is located is ignoring it. When accessing the roof thru the elevator machine room recently to do some maintenance on our antennas, I spotted 2 repeaters belonging to

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR-2000 split question

Okay, the seller responded with the following numbers for the TX and RX boards: The TX is TLE5512BPR The RX is TRE6263APR Do these look right, and if so, what split are they?

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR-2000 split question

ould not be on 174. Maybe 474. > > Joe M. > > George Henry wrote: >> >> Nuts... it's on E-Bay, and close enough for me to pick up if I win, so I >> guess I'll have to ask the seller for more info. I think the ad said it >> was currently on 174, so I wanted

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR-2000 split question

t; >MCH wrote: >> >> >> The model number does not indicate splits. >> >> Joe M. >> >> George Henry wrote: >> > >> > Can anybody tell me which UHF split a C74GSB-3105BT MSR-2000 is on? >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 >> >

[Repeater-Builder] MSR-2000 split question

Can anybody tell me which UHF split a C74GSB-3105BT MSR-2000 is on? Thanks. George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola MSR2000 + NHRC-5

There are several articles on converting an MSR-2000 to amateur repeater service on the Repeater-Builder website, under the Motorola Mitrek/MSR-2000 pages, that include pinouts for connecting an external controller. Take a look at: http://www.repeater-builder.com/msr2k/msr2k-conversion-k4hal

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RAIN Report: D-STAR Repeater Trustee, K6BIV, Responds to NFCC Letter to the FCC

- Original Message - From: "Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RAIN Report: D-STAR Repeater Trustee, K6BIV, Responds to NFCC Letter to the FCC > Jay Urish wrote: >> Another guy with an 'expert' buddy saying D-Star

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters [snip] >>Most coordinators have gone on record as not agreeing with what you are >>doing. It'

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 1:26 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters > At 9/22/2007 09:14, you wrote: > >>Bottom line guys & gals, The D-Star units have two freque

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters [snip] > > Once again, you're not the FCC. You do not get to interpret the rules for > other

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

Read my earlier post under the "Making room for the new guy..." thread as to why their belief that they are aux stations is false. 73, George, KA3HSW - Original Message - From: "MCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Making room for the new guy - repeater coordination - Hope this is not too o

- Original Message - From: "Glenn Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:06 AM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Making room for the new guy - repeater coordination - Hope this is not too o > What are you hearing that is going to come out to define repeater

Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

- Original Message - From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:02 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters [snip] > > You're right-the definition is pretty loose. Some of it is dependant on > the inten

Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters

That pretty much puts the final nail in the coffin of TASMA's proposal

[Repeater-Builder] End of "D-Star systems as auxiliary stations?" thread

I was just gently reminded by someone that Kevin prefers that Part 97 discussions not take place in this forum, so I'm calling an end to the thread. If anyone wishes to discuss it further, please do so directly. Kevin, thank you for your patience. George, KA3HSW

Re: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations?

- Original Message - From: "Jeff DePolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 6:18 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations? >> >5. According to one of the postings on Icom's D-Star forums, the >> >developer(s) of D-Star have ALWAY

Re: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations?

- Original Message - From: "Bob Dengler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:55 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations? > At 9/5/2007 12:45 PM, you wrote: > >>4. It does NOT carry out point-to-point communications over amateur

Re: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations?

1. The repeater input and output frequencies are different. 2. It is TRUE full duplex, simultaneously retransmitting what it receives, with only a few millisecond delay attributable to the bit regeneration process, no more than is seen with many analog repeaters' anti-kerchunk delays. 3. Co

RE: [Repeater-Builder] An interesting observation.....

...and most equipment is rated to perform within specs only within +/- 10% line voltage. George, KA3HSW -Original Message- >From: Eric Lemmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sep 4, 2007 11:24 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] An interesting observation

[Repeater-Builder] D-Star systems as auxiliary stations?

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] [Fwd: DStar Channel Spacing] [snip] > > Which is good for us here in SoCal because TASMA just voted to create

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Frequency coordinator authority (was Re: subaudibe tones..)

Go back and re-read the original thread: this discussion has never been about what one AGREES to... Bob made the claim that TASMA has "control" of the technical standards for the repeaters it coordinates, and tried to cite Part 97 to back up his claim: >At 9/1/2007 11:25, you wrote: >>[EMAIL P

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Cleaning of duplexers...pt 2

>From the smell, I always assumed that TarnX was a dilute sulfuric acid solution. The real key to using it was to QUICKLY flush the treated item with LOTS of water. (I would recommend distilled water if you are going to try and use it on a duplexer...) - Original Message - From: "g

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor UHF RX IC needed M6707

There are a couple of Micor receivers on E-Bay right now - Original Message - From: "Ron Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 6:55 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor UHF RX IC needed M6707 > Bill, > > The UHF Micor receivers are pretty much standa

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Frequency coordinator authority (was Re: subaudibe tones..)

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: subaudibe tones.. [snip] >> >>CORRECTION: 97.3 (a)(22) says "recommends", NOT "establishes" technical >>parameters... > > ...and frequencies. That's what

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: subaudibe tones..

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: subaudibe tones.. [snip] >> >>You guys have control of the quality level of the equipment used when >>issuing coordinations? > > We have control of the tech

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ramsey COM3010 Service Monitor Opinions

The major complaint that I have heard about it is the lack of a 'scope... - Original Message - From: Vincent Caruso To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 11:46 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Ramsey COM3010 Service Monitor Opinions I am s

Re: [Repeater-Builder] test

The answer to B is 2.9979250 x 10^8 M/s, C is 2.718281828459045, and D is 3.1415926535898.. ;-) - Original Message - From: Ham-Radio To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] test 6,756,867,234,9

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Your old work bench - shop pictures are on ebay!

I still have one in the garage on 146.34/94, and it still works!!! (Moto, of course!) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: safemale1 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com ; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:38 PM Subject: Re: [Rep

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Maxar 80

The manual is at my office... I will retreive it tomorrow & scan the parts list and chassis number tables for you. George - Original Message - From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Maxar 80 > Thanks George!

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Maxar 80

There's very little difference between the Maxar, Moxy, and Maxar 80, and I have taken several mid-split (151 - 162) Maxars and Moxy's to 2 meters with no modification at all. I've used 'em for voice and packet. I did have one that I couldn't get to tune up below 145 TX without padding the PA,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer - test r...

Maybe his computer is running on UTC? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer - test r... Jeff Just a dynamite p

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer - test results

Very nicely done, Jeff! At least as good as some manufacturers' reports, and color too! George - Original Message - From: "Jeff DePolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer - test resul

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer

- Original Message - From: "Jeff DePolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Coax length between added cavity and duplexer [snip] > > But that doesn't even compare to the side-arm I saw made out of pine > 2x4's... > > --- Jeff

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Horizontal Polarity Repeater Antenna

And for a marine band repeater, too!!! George, KKA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:33 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Horizontal Polarity Repeater Antenna > Re: Horizontal Polarity Repeater Antenna > > Got t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OFF Topic 2.4ghz

Here in the Chicago area, one only has to drive a few blocks down any suburban side street and you'll find one, just sitting idle on a roof or deck, free for the asking. Plenty of BUD's (Big Ugly Dishes) too... George - Original Message - From: "dgrapach" <[EMAI

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 info?

sed for the > Mocom 35. > > -- Original Message -- > Received: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:23:43 PM CDT > From: "George Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 info? > >> It's already ended, but it was item number 290136403140... you should be >> able to pull it up that way. >> >> George >>

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 info?

t; Could you please post the ebay link to the UHF Mocom 10 on UHF? I > searched & > can't find it. > > -- Original Message -- > Received: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:34:32 PM CDT > From: "George Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Subject: Re: [Repea

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 info?

The one for sale on E-Bay certainly does not look anything like the low-band Mocom 10 I had about 20 years ago... - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 i

[Repeater-Builder] Mocom 10 info?

Can anybody ID what band and split a Mocom 10 with chassis model TLD8652A2 is? Apparently the model number plate was on the case (missing), not the heatsink, so the seller can't ID it.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re Mitrek Icoms

The tuning procedure can be found at http://www.repeater-builder.com/mitrek/mitrek-channel-elements.html but is basically, plug in the element & adjust the coil for maximum local oscillator injection (test set position 6) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 -Original Message- >From: Doug <[EMAI

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Notch duplexer dumb question

dumb question > >George, > >One other comment. The lo is for the lo passing freq and hi is the hi passing >freq with the notch tuned for the other; on lo side tune for notch of hi freq. > >73, ron, n9ee/r > > > > >>From: George Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[Repeater-Builder] Notch duplexer dumb question

I have a Motorola TDN7407A notch duplexer (in reality, a Motorola-branded Celwave 633-6A-2N) that I want to use for a low-power GMRS repeater. The ports are labeled HI and LO now for the dumb question, do those labelings refer to the NOTCH frequency or the pass frequency? Unfortunately, i

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Acronyms-a little OT

I always figured it was coined by guys who struck out on liberty (shore leave). ;-) - Original Message - From: Richard To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 2:23 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Acronyms-a little OT I'm probably wron

[Repeater-Builder] Att'n: Mike Morris

Were you still interested in those Johnson PPL6060's? I've sent you a couple of messages that they were boxed up & ready to go, but haven't heard back George

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 23cm repeaters

I wouldn't mind a copy of that when you get it finished for satellite work. (1268) George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: DCFluX To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 23cm repeaters I'

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Would You..... tower height question

That link does not work - Original Message - From: "Larry Rappaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Would You. tower height question [snip] > > http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/regional_guidance/

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR 2000 repeater NFM conversion

Try Communications Specialists www.com-spec.com/narrow.htm . They have a number of kits for narrow-banding popular radios, as well as the individual ceramic and crystal filters if you want to "roll your own"... I purchased their Mitrek kit for my GMRS repeater conversion, as well as the indivi

<    1   2   3   >