[Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Coy Hilton
are you divulging what you hear? Ron WA6UNM -Original Message- From: Coy Hilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:33 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance If I remember

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread mch
Ronald Schiller wrote: Now if its on tape and you play it back to them are you divulging what you hear? Ron WA6UNM It doesn't matter. You are doing so at THEIR request. That's your 'out'. Joe M. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Micheal Salem
Joe Montierth wrote: What I would like to know is what law or rule is being broken by taping conversations heard on non-telephone type channels? Anyone have a citation, or is this just urban legend? I know it used to be a rule, but that was years ago, lots of things have

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Mathew Quaife
. Hope this clears it all up and puts the thread back on track. Mathew - Original Message - From: Micheal Salem [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance Joe

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Joe Montierth
--- Micheal Salem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Montierth wrote: What I would like to know is what law or rule is being broken by taping conversations heard on non-telephone type channels? Anyone have a citation, or is this just urban legend? I know it used to be a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Joe Montierth
Here's another link to a court case where a federal judge determined that it would not be illegal to divulge the contents of most radio transmissions. In part it reads thusly: Chapter 119 generally prohibits the interception of any oral or electronic communication, which, by definition, includes

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-28 Thread Mathew Quaife
of information on this, just type in those key works, you will find it. Mathew - Original Message - From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:11 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

[Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-27 Thread Coy Hilton
If I remember correctly, The rules says that you can't divolge(?) what you hear. I don't remember anything said about recording, besides this about war declaired on our country. Remember no one can use a ham radio unless they are licensed ...EXCEPT when LIFE, AND PROPERTY is in danger. 73 Coy

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance

2004-05-27 Thread Ronald Schiller
] Re: FBI Release: Suspect Photos- REQUEST Assistance If I remember correctly, The rules says that you can't divolge(?) what you hear. I don't remember anything said about recording, besides this about war declaired on our country. Remember no one can use a ham radio unless they are licensed