Steve Stahl wrote:
I'm a Trucker and in my travels it seems that the link systems are
about the only place anything is going on
I can't tell you how many areas I've been where you open the repeater
book, find a bunch of local machines and can't hear or raise a peep
out of anyone . On the
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
Our club operates a RF full-time linked repeater system in metro New
York City, currently comprised of four (4) repeaters. We've observed
that the addition of a new
: Steve Stahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/26 Mon AM 10:08:59 CST
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
I'm a Trucker and in my travels it seems that the link systems are
about the only place
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Tony L.
Sent: Wed 21-Nov-07 18:59
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone
Repeaters
Our club operates a RF full-time linked repeater
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 9:18 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Paul Plack wrote
On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Paul Plack wrote:
For long-term monitoring, a repeater with inconspicuous CWID,
minimalist courtesy tones and delays to kill squelch tails gets my
vote every time.
We built a machine that CTCSS TX from the repeater follows user input
(user CTCSS in) --
At 11/23/2007 09:17, you wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Paul Plack wrote:
For long-term monitoring, a repeater with inconspicuous CWID,
minimalist courtesy tones and delays to kill squelch tails gets my
vote every time.
We built a machine that CTCSS TX from the repeater follows
At 11:22 PM 11/21/2007, you wrote:
Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned,
linked, high level, wide coverage system before using a low level
machine. Of the 2m low level machines, only one or two see limited
use. There are many UHF machines in the area, but they see
: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Richard wrote:
Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned,
linked, high level, wide coverage system before using a low level
machine. Of the 2m low level machines
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Wagoner
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 6:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
At 11:22 PM 11/21/2007, you wrote:
Here it is mostly
AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
I think the main problem is TOO MANY REPEATERS J I've got a good antenna
where I'm at and can hit every repeater in a 75-100 mile radius. as part of my
hunting for a pair, I checked EVERY VHF
- Original Message -
From: John Barrett
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked
Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone Repeaters
I think the main problem is TOO MANY REPEATERS J
I've got
On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Tony L. wrote:
We're puzzled as to why people seem to shy away from most, but not
all,
of the very wide coverage area systems. The busiest repeaters in our
area seem to be the no frills stand alones. Are voice IDs, courtesy
tones, and coverage footprints
://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:52 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Richard wrote:
Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned,
linked, high level, wide coverage system before using a low level
machine. Of the 2m low level machines, only one or two see limited
use. There are many UHF machines in the area,
You folks also have great ski runs.
73 de na6m
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Richard wrote:
Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned,
linked, high level, wide coverage system before using a low level
machine. Of the 2m low level machines, only one
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Mark Stennett wrote:
You folks also have great ski runs.
73 de na6m
Heh, yeah... snow has been slow to arrive for the high-country this
year, but it'll come...
To keep this on-topic, plus you can get an idea of where our repeaters
sit in relation to
17 matches
Mail list logo
