Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-05 Thread Paul Plack
Assuming manufacturers will limit the capabilities of their equipment to the letter of the Part 97 law has proven unreliable. Manufacturers of imported dual-band mobiles provided capability for aux operation using 2m as the control side years before it was legal, and lots of ACC-controlled 2m

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-05 Thread Pointman
Well then, a 444 MHZ repeater controlling a 10 meter remote base would be perfectly legal then!!! DE KM3W --- On Fri, 9/4/09, mwbese...@cox.net mwbese...@cox.net wrote: From: mwbese...@cox.net mwbese...@cox.net Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal? To: Repeater-Builder

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread mwbesemer
Somebody needs a new copy of Part 97. Mike WM4B On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM , larryjspamme...@teleport.com wrote: From the tenmet...@yahoogrou ps mailing list (mainly a group of people who participate in the 10-10 Club awards programs.) There's a discussion on the list about how HF

Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread MCH
They are not crossband repeaters. They ARE remotely controlled stations. The AUX links are on 2M or above which is perfectly legal. Legally the HF station is no different than one you're sitting in front of. The only difference is that the controls are extended. This can be done via landline

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread Eric Lemmon
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 9:51 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal? Somebody needs a new copy of Part 97. Mike WM4B On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM , larryjspamme...@teleport.com wrote: From the tenmet...@yahoogrou

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
Here in Arlington County, VA OEM/RACES we have two Internet Remote Amateur Radio (IRAR) Stations build around the Kenwood TS2K w/ 80-6M and 2m-70cm antennas. Our RACES volunteers check-in to the weekly exercise nets using the IRAR stations when they are traveling for business or just for fun.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread MCH
EL is just another control link method - in his case land line. That said, EL should be smart enough to not transmit on active frequencies. That's a shortcoming of EL or the interfacing, not necessarily the operator. Joe M. David Jordan wrote: Here in Arlington County, VA OEM/RACES we

Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread James Delancy
Echolink has the capability to not transmit over active frequencies. You can also shut off the announcements if you desire. If you use COR instead of VOX with echolink, it works even better. James MCH wrote: EL is just another control link method - in his case land line. That said, EL

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
, dave _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of MCH Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:01 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal? EL is just another control link method

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal? Echolink has the capability to not transmit over active frequencies. You can also shut off the announcements if you desire. If you use COR instead of VOX with echolink, it works even better. James MCH wrote