Mike,
Why is your mail client including two images with every e-mail? A small
rectangular box as image001.jpg and a single white dot as image002.jpg?
I'll forward you a copy off-list so you can see the attachments that got
added somewhere.
Nate WY0X
I wish I knew! Using Outlook 2007 here. Anybody got any ideas?
Mike
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:14 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
I wish I knew! Using Outlook 2007 here. Anybody got any ideas?
Mike
WM4B
Change your email to send in plain text mode. Or do the right thing and
use Thunderbird ;c}
Mike,
Why is your mail client including two images with every e-mail? A small
No
Ill just do the right thing and ignore that second comment.
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wd8chl
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:36 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
Now wait just a minute. Cochran is not in the middle of nowhere because
I live in the middle of nowhere. I like the two repeaters with carrier
squelch. I have always thought of CTCSS as an inconvenience, but maybe
in more populated areas it is becoming much
How could it be more sensitive with CTCSS? I'm not sure I
understand.
de N5ZTW
- Original Message Follows -
From: Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:41:09 -0500
At 8/19/2008 07:41, you wrote:
I'm thinking that if you really want to have one, and you can get away
with it, OK. But sooner or later, an out-of-town signal will tie it up
and cause grief to others on the frequency. *ALWAYS* have the means to
put it in CTCSS access remotely. Not to mention the
How could it be more sensitive with CTCSS? I'm not sure I
understand.
de N5ZTW
A CTCSS decoder looks for a precise tone frequency in a narrow band, so it's
fairly sensitive.?A squelch circuit?looks?for noise (no signal present) and
loss of?noise (signal present)?in a much broader band?above
At 09:36 AM 08/19/08, you wrote:
How could it be more sensitive with CTCSS? I'm not sure I
understand.
de N5ZTW
A CTCSS decoder looks for a precise tone frequency in a narrow band,
so it's fairly sensitive. A squelch circuit looks for noise (no
signal present) and loss of noise (signal
10:42 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
I'm thinking that if you really want to have one, and you can get away
with it, OK. But sooner or later, an out-of-town signal will tie it up
and cause grief to others on the frequency
: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
The problem is, if everybody uses the same tone, there is no 'immunity'
created.
Remember too that CTCSS doesn't SOLVE anything. it just masks the symptoms.
Mike
WM4B
From
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
He is suggesting that a particular geographic area utilize the same tone,
not that everyone utilize the same tone. I believe that most frequency
coordinators do just this.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message
: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Exactly. If all the repeaters in the same area use the same tone, then any
mixing products, etc. also carry that tone.
Mike
WM4B
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Exactly. If all the repeaters in the same area use the same tone, then any
mixing products, etc. also carry that tone.
Mike
WM4B
Mixing products are a problem that would
Good question! I was wondering exactly the same thing.
Dave BaughnDirector of EngineeringThe University of AlabamaCenter for Public Television and RadioWVUA/WUOA-TV WUAL/ WQPR/ WAPR FMBox 870150195 Reese Phifer Hall, 901 University Blvd.Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487205.348.8622 cell
We are both a radio dealer and have a number of repeaters on the air. Have a
Kenwood TKR-751 on 2 meters and it works very good it also has a 210 controller
on it. Also a GMRS repeater Kenwood TKR-850 with a 210, no problems and a
number of the TRK-740 and 840 repeater in use. Also have
chappyr wrote:
A club is considering Kenwood TKR
repeaters for 2M and 440. The 2M repeater
will be carrier squelch--no tone.
Would appreciate comments how well the
Kenwood squelch works, compared to the famous
Micor squelch, RLC-MOT, MASTR2, etc.
Thanks -- kd4ss
: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
chappyr wrote:
A club is considering Kenwood TKR
repeaters for 2M and 440. The 2M repeater
will be carrier squelch--no tone.
Would appreciate comments how well the
Kenwood squelch works
I am curious why anyone in modern times wants to use carrier squelch? All
radios I have seen for years had ctcss standard. Also I am in Texas and the
Texas VHF-FM society our coordinator agency frowns on carrier squelch on vhf
and does not allow it on uhf. I find ctcss much more sensitive
: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
I am curious why anyone in modern times wants to use carrier squelch? All
radios I have seen for years had ctcss standard. Also I am in Texas and the
Texas VHF-FM society our coordinator agency frowns on carrier squelch on vhf
and does not allow it on uhf. I
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
I am curious why anyone in modern times wants to use carrier squelch? All
radios I have seen for years had ctcss standard. Also I am in Texas and the
Texas VHF-FM society our coordinator agency frowns on carrier squelch on vhf
and does
worth.
Thanks Mike for your hard work, Collin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 9:39 pm
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
We run two machines on carrier squelch
.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B)
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
We run two machines on carrier squelch.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:53 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Mike,
Now wait just a minute. Cochran is not in the middle of nowhere because
I live in the middle of nowhere. I
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood squelch quality
Anyone who can run their repeater in carrier squelch without problems
doesn't know how lucky they are. Neither my 440 machines or my 6-meter
machine can run without it for various reasons. And since they are linked to
other
Guys I was not trying to stir up discontent. I got my ticket in 1974 when very
few if any ham repeaters had ctcss. It was a lot of fun and when the band
opened you could work dx on your local repeater. I really liked that. Now,
however, in Central Texas at least, there is so much congestion
26 matches
Mail list logo
