Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-13 Thread no6b
At 5/12/2008 13:56, you wrote: > >Ron, > >I don't think anyone was proposing putting the control RX 12.5 kHz away. I >think the intent was not .5 channel away, but at least 1.5 channels away, >or 37.5 kHz. Some sensitivity could be lost, and there may be a little >desense moving off the tran

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-13 Thread Wayne
2008 9:34 AM > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without > Separate Antenna > > > I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in this case of a > control receiever, a receiver that is only 12.5 kHz away from your > regular repeater inp

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-13 Thread Wayne
The only place it starts getting that high is over at the Gualdalupe peaks and up in New Mexico. Mostly low hills between here and Lubbock, where the repeater that is 25 KHz above my freuency is located. 25 down is much closer, though I can't find the CTCSS tone for it. I could use a Delt

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Nate Duehr
Ron Wright wrote: > Hey ole man...how is this??? :) > > Also it is putting my sig just after my reply instead of at the end. > > 73, ron, n9ee/r For those having font issues... in most mail readers and browsers, holding down CTRL and pressing the "+" key on the numerical keypad, will take care

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Ron Wright
nking and control. Paul, AE4KR - Original Message - From: Ron Wright To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:34 AM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Ron Wright
ay, May 12, 2008 9:34 AM <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re:Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 06:34 AM 05/12/08, you wrote: >I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in this case of >a control receiever, a receiver that is only 12.5 kHz away from your >regular repeater input. > >With typical good FM analog receivers these would both have >overlapping passbands and an input

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Ron Wright
ct: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re:Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in thiscase of a control receiever, a receiver that is

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread John J. Riddell
-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in this case of a control receiever, a receiver that is only 12.5 kHz away from your regular repeater input. With typical good FM analog receivers these would both have

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Paul Plack
and control. Paul, AE4KR - Original Message - From: Ron Wright To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:34 AM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Ron Wright
Wayne, If your repeater situation is like most, antenna not on 5000 ft mountain, a repeater 165 miles away would not be a problem for you. The users of it would be the interferring parties, but at 165 miles don't think a problem. I would simply chose a freq 25 kHz away for the control receive

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Wayne
While that might work okay, here they have frequencies close to the repeater RX frequencies I might use marked as one way links or repeater inputs. My thought would be using a diplexer of some kind. Of course, I also thought of a diplexer to use the antenna for a low level 2 meter repea

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread John Transue
AF4PD -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:35 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna I would recommend not

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-12 Thread Ron Wright
I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in this case of a control receiever, a receiver that is only 12.5 kHz away from your regular repeater input. With typical good FM analog receivers these would both have overlapping passbands and an input signal on the repeater input would i

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna

2008-05-11 Thread John Transue
Laryn K8TVZ, So, if I understand, I should put a splitter after the pre-amp, and the control frequency should be a split channel. Does this mean that I use half way between two channels? Another question, who makes a good splitter, and how can I know I am getting a good splitter? Ron N9EE