@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 10:43 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
There's a discussion on the list about how HF Remote Base stations are
most likely not legal. Trying to reason with some of these people is an
excercise in futility
Well then, a 444 MHZ repeater controlling a 10 meter remote base would be
perfectly legal then!!!
DE KM3W
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, mwbese...@cox.net mwbese...@cox.net wrote:
From: mwbese...@cox.net mwbese...@cox.net
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
To: Repeater-Builder
From the tenmet...@yahoogroups mailing list (mainly a group of people who
participate in the 10-10 Club awards programs.)
There's a discussion on the list about how HF Remote Base stations are most
likely not legal. Trying to reason with some of these people is an excercise in
futility. But
Somebody needs a new copy of Part 97.
Mike
WM4B
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM , larryjspamme...@teleport.com wrote:
From the tenmet...@yahoogrou ps mailing list (mainly a group of
people who participate in the 10-10 Club awards programs.)
There's a discussion on the list about how HF
They are not crossband repeaters. They ARE remotely controlled stations.
The AUX links are on 2M or above which is perfectly legal.
Legally the HF station is no different than one you're sitting in front
of. The only difference is that the controls are extended. This can be
done via landline
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 9:51 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
Somebody needs a new copy of Part 97.
Mike
WM4B
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM , larryjspamme...@teleport.com wrote:
From the tenmet...@yahoogrou
:43 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
From the tenmet...@yahoogroups mailing list (mainly a group of people who
participate in the 10-10 Club awards programs.)
There's a discussion on the list about how HF Remote Base stations
...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of
*larryjspamme...@teleport.com
*Sent:* Friday, September 04, 2009 12:43 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
From the tenmet...@yahoogroups mailing list (mainly a group of people
who participate
PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
From the tenmet...@yahoogroups mailing list (mainly a group of people
who participate in the 10-10 Club awards programs.)
There's a discussion on the list about how HF Remote Base
,
dave
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of MCH
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:01 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
EL is just another control link method
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?
Echolink has the capability to not transmit over active frequencies.
You can also shut off the announcements if you desire. If you use COR
instead of VOX with echolink, it works even better.
James
MCH wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo
