Nate Duehr wrote:
Hmm... My Kenwood TH-F6A (I assume that's what you mean by F6)
does NOT respond to RB from anything I've tried. How old is
yours? (Perhaps a change?)
Don't remember now...3-4 yrs maybe???
Batt date code is J14A if that helps...
You sure the repeater you're listening to
Nate Duehr wrote:
Sure wish ham manufacturers would get on the ball on this feature
and get it in the ham rigs. It's only been a decade or so now...
all of our repeaters do it... the rigs don't know how to decode
it, and I refuse to mess with chicken burst. I just use real
radios, and it
FWIW-my wife and I have some newer Kenwoods. Both the G71 and F6
respond
to factory Micor r/b and the 7330 r/b properly, as well as most
every
commercial system that has it too. The G707 responds to the Micor
and
7330, but doesn't always do some of the others. The somewhat
older 742
doesn't like
At 11/12/2009 06:41, you wrote:
FWIW-my wife and I have some newer Kenwoods. Both the G71 and F6 respond
to factory Micor r/b and the 7330 r/b properly, as well as most every
commercial system that has it too. The G707 responds to the Micor and
7330, but doesn't always do some of the others. The
: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Linking Repeaters Remotely
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 5:15 PM
It's been since the late 1950's that reverse burst has been around for
PL tones. So for over 50 years the ham manufacturers
MACKEY jmac...@usa.net
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Linking Repeaters Remotely
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 5:15 PM
It's been since the late 1950's that reverse burst has been around for
PL tones. So for over 50 years the ham manufacturers
In the example the most practical way to link the two
repeaters would be to install a single remote base radio
onto one of the repeaters. Connections and control are
simple...
s.
Jerry gdste...@... wrote:
There have been times when during events it would have been great if two
different
and one was stronger than the other.
73 - Jim W5ZIT
--- On Tue, 11/10/09, larynl2 lar...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: larynl2 lar...@hotmail.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Linking Repeaters Remotely
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 7:38 PM
Thanks for the ideas. I really can't add radios to the existing sites as we
don't always know which systems will be linked.
I'll have to check to see how many of our local repeaters drop their encoded pl
after the input drops. If the pl drops right away, I think your solutions will
be the
Yes, as Jerry points out, doing all of this with ex-commercial
rigs means you'll have Reverse Burst or Squelch Tail
Elimination, which are both very adequately documented on the
Repeater-Builder website.
(They are two different things, technically... different number
of degrees of phase shift on
It's been since the late 1950's that reverse burst has been around for
PL tones. So for over 50 years the ham manufacturers haven't gotten
on board yet.
-- Original Message --
Sure wish ham manufacturers would get on the ball on this feature
and get it in the ham rigs. It's only been
That is because it is patented by Motorola.
Please refer to US Patent #3,584,304
US Patent #3,628,058 also describes the squelch circuit used in the
Micor and even gives a schematic for the M6709.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM, JOHN MACKEY jmac...@usa.net wrote:
It's been since the late
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:29:23PM -0700, DCFluX wrote:
That is because it is patented by Motorola.
Please refer to US Patent #3,584,304
US Patent #3,628,058 also describes the squelch circuit used in the
Micor and even gives a schematic for the M6709.
Patents are only a 17 year
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Nate Duehr wrote:
Sure wish ham manufacturers would get on the ball on this feature and
get it in the ham rigs. It's only been a decade or so now... all of
our repeaters do it... the rigs don't know how to decode it, and I
refuse to mess with chicken burst. I just use
At 11/10/2009 15:29, you wrote:
That is because it is patented by Motorola.
Please refer to US Patent #3,584,304
US Patent #3,628,058 also describes the squelch circuit used in the
Micor and even gives a schematic for the M6709.
The latter really gives you a new appreciation for the engineering
In-band RF linking on the user input frequencies is a kludge at best. It can
double with users, and has other timing problems...
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@...
Nate, just a comment on the above. We've used in-band on-channel (IBOC??)
linking to a nearby repeater for weather nets for many moons
On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:38 PM, larynl2 wrote:
In-band RF linking on the user input frequencies is a kludge at best. It can
double with users, and has other timing problems...
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@...
Nate, just a comment on the above. We've used in-band on-channel (IBOC??)
linking to
17 matches
Mail list logo
