...younger techs don't
have this intuitive grasp of propagation.
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: n9wys
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
No, the complaints start when
- Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: n9wys
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
No, Ron. I think it's more a factor of the instant gratification
generation.
If it doesn’t
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Paul Plack wrote:
But if I hear one more salesman call 3 kHz / 8-bit digital sampling
CD quality, I think I'll scream!
I wasn't aware there were that many salesmen that were hard of hearing
or perhaps completely suckered in by whoever sold them thier stereo...
--
Kris
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:05 AM, Ron Wright wrote:
Anyone checked the number of Echolink vs IRLP stations???
Yep, but it doesn't tell the whole story. Millions of dead or not-set-
up-correctly EchoLink stations makes that network quite chaotic.
Try listing the number of stations that are part
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:03 AM, JOHN MACKEY wrote:
The sysops are probably not registering their information. That is
an option
in echolink.
EchoIRLP node operators also have to go into the configuration files
and set up AVRS support in tbd for that web page to work to find their
-- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:18:40 AM CST
From: Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNIP
Your choice. Back then, EchoLink wasn't even checking that people
downloading the software and getting registered even had licenses.
That changed that many years later, too.
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
At 11/20/2007 00:49, you wrote:
I find basically the same problem with eQSO, WIRES, and IRLP.
I can't speak for eQSO or WIRES, but there really is no comparison between
IRLP Echolink when it comes to locating nodes. IRLP has
:
http://www.echolink.org/links.asp
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:32:14 PM CST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
At 11/20/2007 00:49, you wrote:
I find basically the same
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:46 PM, n9wys wrote:
Unfortunately, I need to attach the coverage plots to a 2x4 so I can
whack some of my users up-side the head with it in order to get the
point across. They just don’t understand ...
The Readysnitch and Wouff Hong are standing by for your use at
On Nov 18, 2007, at 10:01 PM, George Henry wrote:
Couple of big differences between D-Star, IRLP and Echolink:
With Echolink, any licensed amateur with a soundcard-equipped
computer and
an internet connection can connect to an Echolink-enabled repeater.
With
IRLP and D-Star, you can
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
On Nov 18, 2007, at 10:01 PM, George Henry wrote:
Couple of big differences between D-Star, IRLP and Echolink:
With Echolink, any licensed amateur with a soundcard-equipped
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/19 Mon AM 03:30:02 CST
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
In the past Dave (VE7LTD) was completely unwilling to allow PC users from
accessing a repeater. Has this changed
that sales is 1/2 about the product and
1/2 BS (not the degree). His sales record showed he knew what he was talking
about, hi.
From: n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/18 Sun PM 09:46:48 CST
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:30 AM, JOHN MACKEY wrote:
In the past Dave (VE7LTD) was completely unwilling to allow PC users
from
accessing a repeater. Has this changed?
Years ago, but your node owner has to install it, and the PC can
connect to only one node at a time, not Reflectors.
At 11/19/2007 06:50, you wrote:
Our local IRLP systems would be repeatedly disconnected by IRLP sysops
when non-related subjects came up. And these subjects were not
controversial, but more like how the beach was that day. It was discouraging.
Chances are you were connected to a reflector
Definitely not true. I've been involved with the local node for a
number of years as a user and tech and never heard, or read about
anything like that.
Laryn K8TVZ
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Echolink because IRLP was so picky about
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our local IRLP systems would be repeatedly disconnected by IRLP
sysops when non-related subjects came up. And these subjects were not
controversial, but more like how the beach was that day. It was
discouraging.
We
On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:09 PM, wb6ymh wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Our local IRLP systems would be repeatedly disconnected by IRLP
sysops when non-related subjects came up. And these subjects were not
controversial, but more like how
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Bill wrote:
I kinda agree. Get used to the infrastructure systems and you can’t
make a contact when it goes down, that’s when the complaining
starts. i.e. cellphones and isp problems. Heck that’s when real
amateur radio can shine! Heck, the complaints
That is exactly why I operate my own repeaters, with my own internet
gateways.
-- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:39:18 PM CST
From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
Yep, the non-do-ers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/18 Sun PM 09:46:48 CST
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
Iâve got RM and used it for the pastseveral years. Quite a learning
curve with it, but for a free piece ofsoftware it is very
On Nov 19, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Ron Wright wrote:
Our local IRLP systems would be repeatedly disconnected by IRLP
sysops when non-related subjects came up. And these subjects were
not controversial, but more like how the beach was that day. It was
discouraging.
We got reports from
Imagine your 2M or 70CM base station were on a tall, tall, tower and you
can key and operate any one of 140 different repeaters world wide, no
noise, static, etc.
Thats DSTAR today. From Hawaii to Alaska, to Vancouver to Ottawa, to
Los Angeles, to London, to Berlin to Venice, to Darwin, AU.
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve S. Bosshard
(NU5D)
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
Imagine your 2M or 70CM base station were
: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
Imagine your 2M or 70CM base station were on a tall, tall, tower and you
can key and operate any one of 140 different repeaters world wide, no
noise, static, etc.
Thats DSTAR today. From Hawaii to Alaska, to Vancouver to Ottawa, to
Los
At 11/18/2007 06:50, you wrote:
Imagine your 2M or 70CM base station were on a tall, tall, tower and you
can key and operate any one of 140 different repeaters world wide, no
noise, static, etc.
Thats DSTAR today.
That's also IRLP Echolink today, albeit with much greater coverage.
Bob NO6B
!!
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n9wys
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 8:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
No, the complaints start when they can't hear/access the machine everywhere
I've got RM and used it for the past several years. Quite a learning curve
with it, but for a free piece of software it is very comprehensive and has
served me very well!
Unfortunately, I need to attach the coverage plots to a 2x4 so I can whack
some of my users up-side the head with it in
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage
Steve,
I think this is what is misunderstood by most repeater owners and users is
that D-Star has set up
Hello all,
I am Allen, senior radio technician, working in Africa, new member.
I have extensive experience in trunking systems, but not very good
with conventional.
I would like to know the best method to link 4 repeaters (conventional)
to work as one channel. Are link radios the best method?
I have used Spoke and Hub system. Several 146 Mhz repeaters cross connected
to 440 Mhz control stations, all looking at the same 440 repeater for
distrubution between the different 144 Mhz repeaters. Steve NU5D
On 1/7/07, allenittiyavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I am Allen,
@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: [Repeater-Builder] Wide area coverage
Hello all,
I am Allen, senior radio technician, working in Africa, new member.
I have extensive experience in trunking systems, but not very good
with conventional.
I would like to know the best method to link 4 repeaters (conventional)
to work
32 matches
Mail list logo
