Robert, the jars are there, we should probably do a little renaming. My
fault for not looking yesterday.
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/apache-jaxme/jars/
!!
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/apache-jaxme/jars/jaxme-incubation-0.2.jar
we
On 11 Mar 2004, at 19:59, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
So, if your going to be distributing a build release I recommend
the naming strategy where all artifactID's match. If the jaxme
project is planning to leave the incubator
jaxme would have been out of incubation by now but there are some major
hassles with procedure.
No, there was a vote taken. It was then redone a day later in a public
forum. Hardly a major hassle, nor a significant delay.
--- Noel
hi mark
i can see the jaxme jars on apache but not in the maven repository on
ibiblio. is there anything else i need to do to push the content over
there?
(or have i just make some mistake in the upload...)
- robert
On 8 Mar 2004, at 22:20, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
More likely the mirroring process is still being problematic. I'll grill
Jason for a few minutes and get things updated.
-Mark
robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi mark
i can see the jaxme jars on apache but not in the maven repository on
ibiblio. is there anything else i need to do to push the
On 08.03.2004, at 23:20, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
project
pomVersion3/pomVersion
groupIdapache-jaxme/groupId
nameApache Jaxme/name
currentVersion0.2/currentVersion
organization
nameApache Software Foundation/name
The official name is 'The Apache Software Foundation', as
Its ok, half the projects in Maven repository never deployed pom's so
its usage is somewhat speculative in the first place.
-Mark
Erik Abele wrote:
On 08.03.2004, at 23:20, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
project
pomVersion3/pomVersion
groupIdapache-jaxme/groupId
nameApache Jaxme/name
hi mark
i've given it a go myself but i have a few questions and i'd appreciate
it if you'd check my work so far.
On 7 Mar 2004, at 16:18, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
You need to establish what your groups id will be. The current naming
trend for Apache xml projects has been a bit haphazard.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi mark
i've given it a go myself but i have a few questions and i'd appreciate
it if you'd check my work so far.
On 7 Mar 2004, at 16:18, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
You need to establish what your groups id will be. The current naming
trend for Apache xml projects has
(i don't think that the raw jars are distributed at the moment so
symlinking is out of the question.)
since it's a maven repository, are there any guidelines about the right
way to put stuff into there?
what about the artifact id/group id stuff?
- robert
On 6 Mar 2004, at 23:20, Sander Striker
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 23:43, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
I don't think we're referring to it as the official Apache Repository.
It is a Maven repository located on www.apache.org
/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository is the location to get things
into maven (it is rsynced with the maven
11 matches
Mail list logo
