Is anyone interested in reviving this project?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone interested in reviving this project?
Yes :-)
Last time this list stopped at the last proposal of how to implement the
repository for Apache, and IIRC it was about placing jars in the current
dist space, that can thus be mirrored.
As for codebase, I have seen th
As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at
(and I would be highly against changing that again now
as its just a major pain in the to move 100s of
files around).
As for code, well, personally, not really.
Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea
nevertheless.
cheers,
- Leo
[EM
On 23/10/2003, at 08:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone interested in reviving this project?
Although I won't be of any great help when it comes to Java
specifics, I'll be lurking here and perhaps might be able to lend
a hand when questions concerning our mirroring system crop
up...
Cheers,
Eri
Leo Simons wrote:
As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at
(and I would be highly against changing that again now
as its just a major pain in the to move 100s of
files around).
From my site, I totally agree.
As for code, well, personally, not really.
Maven worksforme :D. But it cou
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
As for code, well, personally, not really.
Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea
nevertheless.
We must cater for all projects, not only Maven-enabled ones.
Yes, it's possible to take away the code from Maven and make that
indipendent, but again I propose to sta
