Hi Jason,
> Just a note to any Maven developers who are interested in discussing the
> format of the future repository layout for Apache are welcome to join in
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think we have lots to offer in this area so
> if you have some pop into the discussions.
Very cool you have good
>
> Well, let's make sure that we get input from the httpd release folks before
> we re-design the layout of the library. I just want to make sure that we
> have a consensus across projects that everyone can live with, not just Java
> projects, and which works for the full spectrum of projects.
Niclas,
Very sound advice and keen observations ... you're right! Time will tell and
we need to start making some baby steps in the right direction for now. I
think involvement with the Maven people in defining what a repository is for
one single Apache repository is most important first.
> I have been out of commission for the better part of this year but
> Plexus was slated to integrate Maven's repositories directly. Of late
> I've been discussing this with the Loom folk and ~10 people who have
> access to the Plexus-based version of Maven.
Yes, I remember checking out maven-new
> [snip]
> > I don't intend to inflame anyone so please don't take it in the wrong
> way
> > but the Maven PMC sounds like a closed society to me. The maven-new
> details
> >
> > are hidden pending some PMC conclusions. The Wagon details are hidden
> > as well again pending PMC conclusions.
Hello,
After reading a few of the conversations on the list I have come up with some
ideas.
First Jason mentioned the use of decorations to embellish the functionality of
the repository. After some thought I will have to agree even though I did not
at first. Keeping the repository simple is
