Re: [Fwd: Re: [PROPOSAL] follow apache mirror layout convention]

2003-05-08 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote, On 08/05/2003 10.19: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I've quickly looked at the proposal, and it's the same proposal as my last mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is the same as Costin's. Is it correct? yes (as I wrote :D). Too long mail, dude ;-P The next thing I would like to see is the

Re: [PROPOSAL] follow apache mirror layout convention

2003-05-08 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote, On 07/05/2003 20.48: Hi gang, I propose we start following the apache mirror layout convention as designed by the infrastructure team, including the amendment voted upon by the [EMAIL PROTECTED] I volunteer to do so (aw!). Details below. ... I've quickly looked at the proposal,

Re: [PROPOSAL] follow apache mirror layout convention

2003-05-08 Thread Stephen McConnell
Leo: Can you confirm that the following Maven dependency declaration would be consistent with what you are proposing - I'm using the cornerstone-threads package as an example where we have mixed artifacts relative to a group. cornerstone-threads cornerstone-threads-api 1.0 cor

Re: [PROPOSAL] follow apache mirror layout convention

2003-05-07 Thread Berin Loritsch
Leo Simons wrote: Hi gang, I propose we start following the apache mirror layout convention as designed by the infrastructure team, including the amendment voted upon by the [EMAIL PROTECTED] I volunteer to do so (aw!). Details below. One issue: we don't separate source from binary. - Leo PS: cc

[PROPOSAL] follow apache mirror layout convention

2003-05-07 Thread Leo Simons
Hi gang, I propose we start following the apache mirror layout convention as designed by the infrastructure team, including the amendment voted upon by the [EMAIL PROTECTED] I volunteer to do so (aw!). Details below. - Leo PS: ccing [EMAIL PROTECTED] so the lurkers on there know some actual act