Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-31 Thread Nick Chalko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer to have version in the filename. but do we want to FORCE that on projects prublishing to our repository. Yes. Ok I think we can concur. and add this to the requirement/ Goals doc All artifacts in the repository WILL include the version in t

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-31 Thread dion
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 10:32:28 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:05:06 AM: > >>Must every artivact have the version in the file name? > >> > >Definitely. > > Some artifacts don't like having the full version n

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-31 Thread Nick Chalko
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: I feel we could/should unashamedly complete our thoughts on Java, then go and recruit some per-language specialists to chime in on their flavour. Maybe we'll have one repository 'class' with per language sub-classes. Let's mature what we can agree upon before we specialize &

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-31 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Some artifacts don't like having the full version number. > dll for example. I think the DLL name needs to be stable and thus > would not have the full version info. > For the dll example we can mandate that it has to be put in a versioned > zip/tar.gzip If we continue to think 100% genericall

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nick Chalko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:05:06 AM: Must every artivact have the version in the file name? Definitely. Some artifacts don't like having the full version number. dll for example. I think the DLL name needs to be stable and thus

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread dion
"Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:10:44 AM: > Folks wrote: > Are we discussing URI or URL? If URI, ok good .. but is this current? > > I thought it was more like (w/ pseudo-regexp notation): > > http:jars/[-][-].ext 'jars' is the of the thing. e.g. jars, tlds

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread dion
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:05:06 AM: > So here are some open questions. > > How do we pick unique human readable top level directories, in other > words how do we name the directories for projects ad sub-projects. Again, only as an example, maven takes the subproje

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nick Chalko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is still some naming details to work out. An apache project can be a very big thing. Take the CLI project in Jakarta commons that would be apache-jakarta-commons-cli vs the pacakge name org.apache.commons.cli This is where the previous naming conventi

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread dion
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 08:38:36 AM: > >Since this is an ASF repo, isn't the ASF project name enough? > > > > > > > I think I would still prefix it with apache, so that other organizations > can follow our pattern with out conflicts. Also allowing other > reposito

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Folks wrote: > > > > So here is a key focuossed issue. > > What should the URI look like > > > > The latest URI discussed was > > > > http:/artifact-[].ext > > > > For example > > * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar Are we discussing URI or URL? If URI, ok good .. but

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nick Chalko
So here are some open questions. How do we pick unique human readable top level directories, in other words how do we name the directories for projects ad sub-projects. Should each version have its own subdir? Should each artifact type have it's own subir? Do we support both version and type su

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Nick Chalko wrote: ... What should the URI look like The latest URI discussed was http:/artifact-[].ext For example * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICE

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nick Chalko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Special versions. = Most people agree we should support Latest (released), and Nightly, along with the normal released builds Maven also has 'SNAPSHOT' which is similar in context to Nightly, but not necessarily built on a nightly basis. +1 The part still n

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread dion
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 05:43:38 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >Simple focussed discussion without talking about incubating projects or > >adopting projects works for me. Those are separate issues. > > So here is a key focuossed issue. > What should the URI

Re: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Nick Chalko
Noel J. Bergman wrote: The part still needs to be decided is the project name. I think the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with - instead of . Let's be careful. We should be -1 to anything that is Java-specific in such manner as to preclude non-Java projects. Reme

RE: URI Syntax was: Repository

2003-10-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> The part still needs to be decided is the project name. > I think the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with - > instead of . Let's be careful. We should be -1 to anything that is Java-specific in such manner as to preclude non-Java projects. Rememnber: this is the ASF Repos