Re: URI proposals updated

2003-11-30 Thread Stephen McConnell
Tim: Short note to let you know that I updated ASFRepository/JavaArtifacts to include the Avalon bar file as a java-artifact-specifier. I think that this latest spec is looking a lot more robust - thanks for the effort on this. Cheers, Steve. Tim Anderson wrote: I've updated the proposals to incorp

RE: URI proposals updated

2003-11-29 Thread Tim Anderson
riginal Message- > From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, 29 November 2003 2:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: URI proposals updated > > > Excelent work. I think this a very manageable set of specs. > > I have one question for the

Re: URI proposals updated

2003-11-29 Thread Nick Chalko
Excelent work. I think this a very manageable set of specs. I have one question for the http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/CommonBuildVersionSpecifier MileStone builds (ala eclipse) are they a "formal" or interm. Interm I think. R Nick

URI proposals updated

2003-11-27 Thread Tim Anderson
I've updated the proposals to incorporate some of the feedback received. Each proposal can be accessed from: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Proposals (this also contains an overview) Summary of changes: 1. constrained organisation in Repository URI Syntax http://n