Source: civicrm
Version: 4.7.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
civicrm fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:42:21 -0500
with message-id <20160308004221.GA27498@jasmine>
and subject line Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#815844: diffoscope won't build
without python-magic from PyPi
has caused the Debian Bug report #815844,
regarding diffoscope won't build without
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:34:23AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I got the impression it was another broadcom chip, maybe with a
> cortex-a53? Gotta love ARM's confusing namespace.
Yes another broadcom videocore chip with the quad A7 upgraded to quad
A53. Nothing to do with Allwinner (who
Hi Christian,
On Freitag, 26. Februar 2016, Christian Boltz wrote:
> (I'm not subscribed here - please CC me in your replies.)
done :)
> Is someone interested to give a talk about Reproducible Builds at the
> openSUSE Conference (June 22-26 in Nürnberg, Germany)?
>
> We had some interest in
Hi,
On Montag, 7. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Sure, but I suspect there are *some* builds that will never succeed in
> under 12 hours with a single CPU core (on the current armhf build
> hardware, anyways).
I doubt there are many of those, who will manage with dual-cores in 12h,
On 2016-03-07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> > I'm also pondering to change it to use CPUs+1 for the first builds and
>> > CPUs for the 2nd ones.
>> That would be interesting, although I was thinking we might want to do a
>> fewer number of CPUs on
Hi Lunar,
thanks for rebasing our changes on the latest master branch!
On Freitag, 4. März 2016, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> This versions implement changes discussed in #138409. One is that we are
> now capturing some environment variables in .buildinfo files. In the
> case of
Hi Axel,
On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > I think we'd need 10-12 of such boards for a start, not sure if we still
> > have Debian funds to buy those (but I almost think so… Vagrant?) -
> > providing we would find someone interested+able to host these. Would you
> > (Axel) be
Hi,
as a general comment to the Debian ARM people: thanks a lot for your
insightful comments, even though they smashed the idea of cheap arm64 Debian
builders for now! Much appreciated feedback!
On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure how much CPU/board
Hi,
On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > I'm also pondering to change it to use CPUs+1 for the first builds and
> > CPUs for the 2nd ones.
> That would be interesting, although I was thinking we might want to do a
> fewer number of CPUs on the first build, to make it more likely
Source: gstreamer1.0
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
gstreamer1.0 fails to build from source in
Source: gstreamer0.10
Version: 0.10.36-1.5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
gstreamer0.10 fails to build from source in
12 matches
Mail list logo
