On Feb 15, 9:42pm, hol...@layer-acht.org (Holger Levsen) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Thanks for the extra run
| Hi Christos,
|
| are you subscribed or should I keep cc:ing you?
I am subscribed.
| git clone git.debian.org/git/qa/jenkins.debian.net.git=20
| cd jenkins.debian.net
| $editor
Hi Christos,
are you subscribed or should I keep cc:ing you?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:56:01PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> By the way, I think that next run will be fully reproducible, so can
> we vary some more things?
*g* awesome!
git clone git.debian.org/git/qa/jenkins.debian.net.git
Title: Paragraf Lex MNE - Newsletter
Osigurajte se da Vam newsletter uvijek stigne u inbox - dodajte našu adresu u adresar svog e-mail programa
Package: diffoscope
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
In jessie, xxd outputs one less digit in the line address listing than
expected. This causes tests that call xxd to fail because the output does
not exactly match the output of xxd that was use to generate the expected
diff.
On Feb 15, 9:52pm, mat...@debian.org (Mattia Rizzolo) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Thanks for the extra run
| Indeed you're not pestering, but I didn't notice these requests as after
| reading the subjects I just ignored them
| Sorry, I'll try to be more careful next time!
Ok, I will make sure
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:45:06PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > Sorry to pester again, but can we have another run?
>
> sure! (and you're surely not pestering! :)
Indeed you're not pestering, but I didn't notice these requests
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Sorry to pester again, but can we have another run?
sure! (and you're surely not pestering! :)
(+done, triggered)
> Thanks,
thank you too, for caring about reproducible builds of netbsd!
--
cheers,
Holger
On Feb 12, 11:15am, chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
-- Subject: Thanks for the extra run
Sorry to pester again, but can we have another run?
Thanks,
christos
| Thanks Mattia,
|
| Can we have another?
|
| I think I fixed the remaining 4 problems:
|
|
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #855233 [diffoscope] diffoscope: Crashes when comparing bad JSON on Python
pre-3.5
Added tag(s) pending.
--
855233: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:47:01PM -0500, Brett Smith wrote:
> Package: diffoscope
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream patch
Thank you for your bug and patch, which I merged via IRC before even
noticing this bug report :)
--
regards,
Mattia
Package: diffoscope
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
Commit 50be22f checks for JSON decoding errors by catching
json.JSONDecodeError. This class was introduced in Python 3.5. Earlier
version of the json module simply raised ValueError in the same situation.
When running
Holger Levsen:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:44:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> I do think it's OK to try to support diffoscope 67 for 2 years because it's
>> been quite well tested.
>
> well, yes… but…
>
>> I understand that 77 fixes quite a lot of bugs over 67…
>
> 77 *exists* and is quite
12 matches
Mail list logo
