Source: zipios++
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Hi,
so yesterday I tried to build
http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5.dsc
with pbuilder on sid/armhf and that failed _exactly_ like
https://reproducible.debian.net/rbuild/unstable/amd64/dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5.rbuild.log
I then tried to build
Source: libsyncml
Version: 0.5.4-2.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that libsyncml could
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.130
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
The Debian reproducible builds team [1] recently proposed a new
environment variable
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 16:49:13 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
so yesterday I tried to build
http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5.dsc
with pbuilder on sid/armhf and that failed _exactly_ like
Source: ruby-mkrf
Version: 0.2.3+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
In file included from /usr/include/ruby-2.1.0/ruby/encoding.h:23:0,
Source: ruby-org
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
2) Orgmode::Headline should understand a single tag
Source: ruby-omniauth-github
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
1) OmniAuth::Strategies::GitHub client options should have
Source: ruby-merb-assets
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
/usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*_spec.rb
~ No
Source: ruby-mercenary
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
Failures:
1) Mercenary::Option compares itself with other
Source: ruby-multi-xml
Version: 0.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build:
Failures:
1) MultiXml LibXML parser behaves like a parser
Source: whizzytex
Version: 1.3.2-1.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed
that whizzytex could not
Johannes Schauer:
here are several questions I have which, for me boil down to information being
duplicated and stored in different locations, leading to possible confusion
for
contributors and added work when adding new bugs and issues:
Before I go further with answering: it seems you
On 2015-07-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
The current specs:
bpi0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
Banana PI, dual-core, 1GB ram, ~20GB mSATA.
ssh port:
ssh fingerprints:
2048 8f:0a:d0:77:a8:59:c0:bb:d0:76:de:14:13:5b:a6:56 (RSA)
256 af:b4:13:04:21:30:46:b3:e8:79:ff:7d:99:20:86:f0 (ECDSA)
debbindiff_27_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debbindiff_27.dsc
debbindiff_27.tar.gz
debbindiff_27_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
debbindiff_27_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
debbindiff_27.dsc
debbindiff_27.tar.gz
debbindiff_27_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
___
Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:34:30 +
with message-id e1zl6hy-0005yq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#785777: fixed in debbindiff 27
has caused the Debian Bug report #785777,
regarding debbindiff: hexdump output when text encoding of file has changed
to be marked as done.
Hi Clint,
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, Clint Adams wrote:
I suggest comparing builds with and without the Recommends of the
Build-Depends installed.
I think thats out of scope for our project currently: buildds don't install
recommends, so we also don't install them.
It's probably still
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:56:32PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Clint,
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, Clint Adams wrote:
I suggest comparing builds with and without the Recommends of the
Build-Depends installed.
I think thats out of scope for our project currently: buildds don't install
Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:53:17 +0200
with message-id 20150731095317.GA32590@loar
and subject line Re: Bug#789003: debbindiff: should not try to create device
files
has caused the Debian Bug report #789003,
regarding debbindiff: should not try to create device files
to be marked as
On 31/07/15 07:25, Chris Packham wrote:
The problem is that date -u implies UTC. So + is right if you do
want the time to be displayed in UTC (for me living at +12/+13 UTC
makes my head hurt because all the dates are yesterday).
One of the main problems with human-readable date/time is
21 matches
Mail list logo
