Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible patches for libisoburn and libisofs

2016-08-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > +++ libisoburn-1.3.2/libisoburn/isoburn.c Oh nostalgy. :)) - General questions: Is it really desirable/correct to override the timestamps of files when they get put into the ISO image ? I.e. isn't reproducible build

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Moving towards buildinfo on the archive network

2016-08-03 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Jonathan, Quoting Jonathan McDowell (2016-07-25 22:29:39) > Having been impressed by the current status of reproducible builds and > the fact it looks like we're close to having the important pieces in > Debian proper, I have started to have a look at how I could help out > with this bug. I've

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#833340: mini-buildd: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Holger Levsen
user Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org usertag 833340 + Environment Hi, On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:20:47PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Source: mini-buildd > Version: 1.0.16 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch thanks for filing this bug with patch! If you plan to file further such bugs

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833370: diffoscope: vim folding for text output

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Package: diffoscope Version: 56 Severity: minor Tags: upstream patch Dear Maintainer, The following provides Vim folding for diffoscope text output: [[[ function! Diffoscope_txt_foldexpr(lnum) let offset = stridx(getline(a:lnum), '├── ') if offset >= 0 return '>'

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833380: roaraudio: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: roaraudio Version: 1.0~beta11-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that roaraudio could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833379: hardinfo: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: hardinfo Version: 0.5.1-1.5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that hardinfo could not be

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible patches for libisoburn and libisofs

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
> Is it really desirable/correct to override the timestamps of files when > they get put into the ISO image ? I.e. isn't reproducible build supposed to > be identical only if the input is identical ? Good question. At least for modification times, I think we *could* go with asking users to run

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833395: emacspeak: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: emacspeak Version: 44.0+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that emacspeak could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833340: mini-buildd: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Boyuan Yang
Control: user reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: usertags -1 environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org 2016-08-03 20:14 GMT+08:00 Chris Lamb : > - default=os.getenv("HOME"), > + default="$HOME", > > Unless I'm missing something, this

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833409: libbson: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: libbson Version: 1.3.5-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that libbson could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833410: dapl: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: dapl Version: 2.1.8-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that dapl could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833408: amora-server: please make the build reproducible

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: amora-server Version: 1.2~svn+git2015.04.25-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that