n general
stuff to generate a python package for distribution, so I can't really
judge on this...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org :
(dkg is taking
care of this bit).
For some history on why we gave up on this see
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/History#Giving_up_on_build_paths
(that would need to be updated to match the current WIP, though).
So, yes, we are not varying the build path, and we're aware of it :)
even a list of what has been tried. Cool!
Is somebody up to update this history page? (maybe it needs some general
overhaul).
I'm really too busy to take care of that, and I'd hate to link outdated
stuff :(
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3
dpkg_1.18.7.0~reproducible0.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
foscope/difference.py", line 234, in
feeder
for buf in in_file:
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/comparators/deb.py", line
122, in strip_checksum
for line in f:
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/encodings/ascii.py", line 26, in decode
return code
akers?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: ht
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:01:49PM +0200, Ximin Luo wrote:
> export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH = $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate | date -f- +%s)
s/=/?=/ might be also nicer, IMHO.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4
it/commit/?id=366596a
Thanks for filing the bug.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https:
t's just `time.time()` (maybe wrapped in int()):
In [21]: time.gmtime()
Out[21]: time.struct_time(tm_year=2016, tm_mon=5, tm_mday=20, tm_hour=21,
tm_min=8, tm_sec=42, tm_wday=4, tm_yday=141, tm_isdst=0)
In [22]: time.time()
Out[22]: 1463778524.5374782
In [23]: int(time.time())
Out[23]: 146377
hoice, also considering this:
mattia@chase ~ % uname -p
unknown
> Unfortunately, the provided logs are only for amd64.
Not sure what are you referring to here.
For i386 there are both logs for build builds done on i386.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 07:55:22AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Please blacklist them on armhf for all suites:
Done.
Thank you very much for list.
Hopefully killing off those will make armhf quicker in the overall.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2
the list of the resulting packages are attached to this email, would
be nice if somebody could check it against reproducible.json (thing that
I'd do before dropping texlive-bin to be able to compare the results).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A
bringing this up.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA pag
as they already did in
other parts).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/qa/jenkins.debian.net.git/commit/?id=f5c5274cea8cc4d7b58e374c7114f01c07019035
> Do you think it would be possible to achieve the same result with a
> "banned packages" list which is architecture-specific instead of this
> funny issue?
/deb.py", line
138, in strip_checksum
for line in f:
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/codecs.py", line 321, in decode
(result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xb2 in p
dpkg_1.18.7.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
doxygen_1.8.11-2.0~reproducible0.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailm
FYI:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:43:53AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Our FontForge package is unused since quite some time.
> While rebasing it wouldn't be hard, it actually needs some more work.
I've now moved the package away from our apt repository into the
findutils_4.6.0+git+20160517-3.0~reproducible0.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org
ould also cause some packages to FTBFS.
See also
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589687
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+bug/816556
for some bugs about the same issue in pbuilder.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52
aused by a bug in src:file, which is now fixed.
though,
> Versions of packages diffoscope depends on:
> ii python3-magic 1:5.28-2
this is the fixed version.
Are you sure you ran diffoscope with that version of python3-magic?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
aults.". Like
that, a out of context quote.
¹ I kinda agree though that building untrusted sources (or whatever,
fwiw) in your home as your user, and expecting everything to go well
it's naive.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF
dpkg_1.18.9.0~reproducible0.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
dpkg_1.18.9.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
dpkg_1.18.9.0~reproducible2.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#Q:_Can_we_add_support_for_new_default_build_flags_to_dpkg-buildflags.3F
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :'
of the above, so I'll personally go with the latter
for what I'm concerned.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
live by either adding -O2 yourself
in d/rules or leaving it to whatever default fpc has.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :&
ase.mapreri.org
A quick workaround would be to disable the reproducible/fixdebugpath
buildflags with
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=reproducible=-fixdebugpath
A possibly more proper fix would be to use a different separator than /,
like it's done wit
oducible/fixdebugpath
buildflags with
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=reproducible=-fixdebugpath
A possibly more proper fix would be to use a different separator than /,
for example : or #.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B94
IONS=reproducible=-fixdebugpath
A possibly more proper fix would be to use a different separator than /,
like : or #.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
ags with
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=reproducible=-fixdebugpath
The real problem here is that clang 3.7 doesn't support
-fdebug-prefix-map, whilst 3.8 does. See the blocking bug for more
information. You might either want to wait for clang to either switch
to 3.8 or backport the patch,
temporary glitch, it's now marked as reproducible.
(holger rescheduled it)
Thanks for notifying us :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)"
for example, using tar:
tar --mtime="@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)" -c -f out.tar in
this is a valid command when SDE is set, but it's going to fail as
soon as it's not set anymore, I fear; and it makes a lot of sense in
a d/rules to tar something up.
--
rega
dpkg_1.18.10.0~reproducible0.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:54:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Some extra background — we usually remove archived bugs from notes. I
> believe there is a script for this..
Just ran it.
I usually run it every so often, when I remember :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzol
t know the password…
> >
> > do you want to know it?
it's in our shared home on alioth, anyway...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:03:07PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I also agree.
alright, I removed the prefix from the lists now.
While on it, I also added my address to the list of administrators.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4
fernt problem than just
reproducible build indeed, and we're not so much concerned (as they
don't block our general work really).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.
*self._kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/difference.py", line 190, in
feed
end_nl = feeder(f)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/difference.py", line 260, in
feeder
raise subprocess.CalledProcessError(returnco
on the reproducible build server; when running on a
> system that actually has a UTF-8 terminal locale, the build succeeds.
In the first build we export LANG=C, I wonder if that messes with
python's encoding foo.
--
regards,
Please put a valid email address in your user.email. Stuff (starting by
the KGB bot that relies the commits to our IRC channel) are not happy
with your current setting.
Thanks! :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .
-fprive-arcs -ftest-coverage: exepected
unary operator
Not sure how much related they are, but I guess it means something given
that it's not in the English build.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:39:00AM +, HW42 wrote:
> I think this has nothing to do with locale. The problem is that dash and
> bash are treating 'return' differently.
Oh, wow.
Thank you, I totally forgot there were also 2 different shells…
--
regards,
ere agreed on dropping the prefix.
BTW, no lists on l.d.o have a prefix, and people live happy enough, I
suppose that people interested in sorting/filtering mails in debian have
their way to filter emails somehow already :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B
ing warning we can do nothing about so I agree with
silencing it for now, though keeping in mind in the future it might hide
some deprecation warning actually coming from our use of py.test (which
is pretty simple and standard, I doubt it'll happen anytime soon).
--
regards,
n.net if that is more convenient.
Thanks, merged!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: h
takes care that
the installed ones are on the interested version, e.g. it tested
installed 0.026.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
t version of the packages. Is there a way
> to get these buildinfo-files for older package-versions, too?
There is not, I'm sorry. In the current implementation we delete old
files (including buildinfos) just before storing the new ones.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzo
.py", line 9543, in umount_all
> r = libguestfsmod.umount_all (self._o)
> RuntimeError: umount_all: call launch before using this function
> (in guestfish, don't forget to use the 'run' command)
> Am I missing some dependencies or what does that m
y interest at the failures at
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/diffoscope
instead. Be aware that that's not the only thing failing there. I
failed to debug that last time, and I wanted to actually try it again
with more time resources for the next upload.
--
regards,
Mattia
control: tag -1 pending
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:49:27PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On 14 September 2016 at 17:03, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Be aware that that's not the only thing failing there. I
> > failed to debug that last time, and I wanted to actually t
dpkg_1.18.10.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:24:24AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:36:17PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > +dpkg (1.18.10.0~reproducible1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> > + * Continue to support --buildinfo-identifier as an override for
> > +--bui
ng :)
also, I don't have a blog post, though probably it's a good paraph in
the next weekly report.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :'
They told me it was not totally clear what happens here, why I did this
upload, what triggered the chanegs I did, and why last night.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:55:55PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> dpkg_1.18.10.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to
> https://wiki.debi
r a
single (source,version,architecture) build and document that the very
same build can be accomplished with different environment condition.
That tricks is an easy way to be able to store them without messing
around with renames, etc.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 6
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:24:46PM +, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo:
> > Next steps:
> > it would be great if somebody could figure what's the real gain of
> > having .dsc in Checksums-Sha256.
>
> This is how .buildinfo files have linked a source packa
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:13:42PM +, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo:
> > The reason we like to have a static string in there (and in jenkins we
> > use the host architecture), is that otherwise diffoscope would be noisy
> > about the difference in the name if we
with commit 83593ea75709ff82bb01cd3c8970636a4f5dd31b in master,
already released with v60.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
an-reproducible in OFTC).
If you pick a mailing list, please subscribe to it.
Thank you!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :'
mat-patch
or by using
git send-email
(but this one requires a bit of set up), as they are easier to
incorporate.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
gards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/d
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:03:20PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I'm going to ask the KGB admins to set up a project and have the bots
> join that channel sometime tomorrow evening or Sunday, and then move
> those notifications over there.
KGB maintainers rock, 2 out of 3 replied
w to best tackle the bug.
I was waiting on him to reply himself, but given that he didn't I'm
explicitly calling him to action ;)
> If so then I can work on this
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833697
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66
ms.
I managed to reproduce the issue also on a minimal debian unstable (in a
chroot, attached the log)
> Do I need to install some other packages or diffoscope isn't supported,
> yet, on a headless machine ?
doesn't really make sense that "isn't supported" :)
est in debci¹.
you said you're trying to build the released v61, not a git snapshot
which happens to be a few commits after v61, right?
¹ https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/diffoscope/
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 45
http://meetbot.debian.net/reproducible-builds/2016/reproducible-builds.2016-10-17-19.01.log.html#l-178
⁵
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/cronjobs/ddpo.reproducible?view=markup
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/ddpo/extract_reproducible.pl?view=markup
--
regards
k on as a next step is not not "stick" a build to a
build-path.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
up.py, otherwies I can always turn that
pytest.mark.skip() into a pytest.mark.skipif(True), which is IMHO ugly
but quick and effective for solving this bug, I think. Can you also try
to convert that marking in tests/comparators/utils.py:49 to confirm?
¹ http://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/ch
oducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=fa07622
Really the only gain of pytest.mark.skip() over pytest.mark.skipif() is
that the former is a bit shorter.
I'm trying to finish up some things and pull up a release this week, if
you want you could just wait for that instead of including a patch.
--
re
pressing a fixed
dependency on libarchive13 for this; do python package have any way of
expressing such dependency? Or the only improvements that could be done
here is python-libarchive-c¹ to ward that part offerring a nicer error
message?
¹ as in upstream https://github.com/Cha
me?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
D
3) could apply to *any* text file, not just json, so perhaps it
> should be done at a level higher than the json comparator?
Of course I'm saying this considering to put the text fallback at a
higher level than hacking it into the json comparator.
--
regards,
Control: tag -1 pending
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:52:29AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote on Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 23:21:53 +:
> > Though I'd really prefer to see some tests for this before applying it;
>
> Attached.
>
> The code change is u
by the deploy script instead (like, a
"jenkins node $NODE gpg key") and the build script use it only if it's
present already?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: h
only the option is -s (--short).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'
rom, but it does The Right Thing™ :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
FTR, this started after commit ea750f17d3e2f3e248294e05d8b66cc901e5fa5c,
which introduced some symlinks within the test suite.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
d WIP/parallel2 branches on the
git repository more then one year ago, but was never completed, possibly
that's a good start point nonetheless.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me:
This thread doesn't seem to make progress, anyway:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:54:39PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> 4. figure out why the hell DDPO doesn't deal with that edit in the json,
>see the code⁵ in Debian's QA Team SVN repo, and leave the json to
>displ
anges again diffoscope will walk through the
packages twice, once through .changes→.deb and once through
.changes→.buildinfo→.deb, doubling the comparing time and so causing
timeouts in a lot more packages (and we already have a lot of them).
I'll file a diffoscope bug after this email.
--
(this also means that every
package will most probably hit the "max report size" limit)
* annoyance to the user.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me:
the
.deb diffs. They can provide useful insight (that currently we also
have because the 2 build environments are documented elsewhere). Just
that diffoscope should really not compare files that have already been
compared. It's just very hard to do, on the same level of the parallel
diffos
er case, with my sbuild maintainer hat on, please file wishlist bugs
> against sbuild if its interface is not sufficient to run reproducibility tests
> with it.
Ditto for pbuilder.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
in git as
dea5a1bf4af893ae657d5c106ea7df6c0bbc78fe as we now do the coloring
directly ourself, so the problem actually doesn't exist anymore.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
with some for this
comparator too? :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~map
eproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20160919/007119.html
[ disclaimer: yeah, I know this is coming from the debrebuilder thread,
that is still in my inbox and waiting for a long enough bunch of my time
to read it all and reply properly ]
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
ets more and more important.
ISTR you mentioning a patch for that making the test compatible with
both versions, care to share? :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.o
0:08:14]: test command1: ---]
adt-run [10:08:14]: test command1: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - -
- -
command1 FAIL non-zero exit status 2
>8
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 454
can see it does a useless binary comparison of 2 .ico
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https:/
f._install_debug_symbols()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/tools.py", line 50, in
tool_check
return original_function(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/comparators/elf.py", line
488, in _install_debug_symbols
os.mkdir(o
there is a link to them.
If they are already deleted (they are kept for 24 hours only), just
reschedule the build with -k, as usual.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
lts/rbuild-debian-t4VQ69oJ/dbd-tmp-rsSs31f/tmpc7n1jfvr_diffoscope/./usr/bin/.debug'
I already reported it yesterday, and already fixed in git; merging the
bugs.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
ttps://packages.debian.org/sid/perceptualdiff
> ImageMagick - https://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compare/ -
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/imagemagick
> image-diff - https://github.com/uber/image-diff
Tracked in -2.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizz
Control: reopen -1
Hi Alastair!
I don't think you wanted to close this bug (a bug in src:reprotest)
with your openmpi upload! :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http
. please tell me how I
can write a decorated fuction that doesn't take any value as input and
still returns only pytest.mark.skipif()... what I did is uglyugly), so
I'm filing it as a bug here instead of committing; see the attachment :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
[ please don't CC me in replies to diffoscope bugs ]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 07:07:57PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 18:06:48 +0100:
> > So, I finally managed to look into the tests failures were have been
> > seeing in ubuntu&#x
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
