[Reproducible-builds] Bug#796130: man2html: please use $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to produce reproducible output

Source: man2html Version: 1.6g-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that man2html does not allow

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 12: Move forward reproducible builds

Hello, Last week I worked on the following problems: 1. texlive-bin I made a new patch which uses UTC in the printed timestamps to also make the timezone reproducible. A version of texlive-bin containing this patch can be found in the reproducible builds git repository and packa

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#800653: fftw: Using embedded code copy of texi2html leads to unreproducibility

Source: fftw Version: 2.1.5-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! fftw is using an embedded copy of texi2html which leads to unreproducible html output [1]. texi2html has been patched [2] to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH which allows

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [pdftex] Please make the CreationDate, ModDate and ID field deterministic

Hi, I was wondering what has happened with this proposal since I did not get any reply since August. On 08/12/2015 01:08 PM, Maria Valentina Marin wrote: > On 07/14/2015 12:39 AM, Karl Berry wrote: >> Thanh is away for ~3 weeks. He will review both the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH >>

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#806945: bash: Please make bash build reproducibly

Source: bash Version: 4.3-14 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that bash could not be built reproducibly. There are two problems: 1. Bash uses an embedded copy of ma

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#813345: elastix: please fix patch to make the build reproducible (timestamps)

Source: elastix Version: 4.8-3 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that elastix could not be built reproducibly [2] because it is using the current date to replace the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#775696: getdns: please make the build reproducible

Source: getdns Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], I have noticed that getdns could not be built reproducibly. The file /usr/include/getdns/getdns.h includes the defi

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#777289: libglib-perl: podify_signals produces pod files containing signals in random order

Package: libglib-perl Version: 3:1.305-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain randomness Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libgtk2-perl, libgoo-canvas-perl, and libgnome2-perl could not b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#777441: unicon: fails to build reproducibly because cin2tab produces output in random order

Source: unicon Version: 3.0.4-14 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that unicon could not be built reproducibly. We observed that the file cantonese.tab

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#778250: powerline: leaks environment into build (makes unreproducible and possible privacy breach)

Source: powerline Version: 1.2-2 Severity: normal User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering Hello, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that powerline could not be built reproducibly and it leaks the users environment int

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#778490: doxygen: Please add option to build latex without timestamps

Package: doxygen Version: 1.8.8-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps toolchain Hello, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that pymilter could not be built reproducibly because doxygen embeds time

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779182: alsa-lib: please make the build reproducible

Source: alsa-lib Version: 1.0.28-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that alsa-lib could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra time

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779210: alsaplayer: please make the build reproducible

Source: alsaplayer Version: 0.99.81 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that alsaplayer could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra t

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779215: aroarfw: please make the build reproducible

Source: aroarfw Version: 0.1~beta5-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that aroarfw could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra tim

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779216: aubio: please make the build reproducible

Source: aubio Version: 0.4.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that aubio could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timestamps

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779222: apr-util: please make the build reproducible

Source: apr-util Version: 1.5.4-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that apr-util could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra times

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779223: box2d: please make the build reproducible

Source: box2d Version: 2.3.1+ds-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that box2d could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timestam

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#779225: assimp: please make the build reproducible

Source: assimp Version: 3.0~dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that assimp could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timest

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#780617: doxygen: Please change the default of HTML_TIMESTAMP from YES to NO

Package: doxygen Version: 1.8.8-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745439 Hello, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that severa

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787765: cassiopee: please make the build reproducible

Source: cassiopee Version: 1.0.3+dfsg Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that cassiopee could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the va

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787804: clipper: please make the build reproducible

Source: clipper Version: 2.1.20130601-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that clipper could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the v

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787829: colobot: please make the build reproducible

Source: colobot Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that colobot could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_TIMESTA

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787865: fastjet: please make the build reproducible

Source: fastjet Version: 3.0.6+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fastjet could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the H

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787916: cal3d: please make the build reproducible

Source: cal3d Version: 0.11.0-4.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that cal3d could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime from

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787918: dime: please make the build reproducible

Source: dime Version: 0.20111205-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dime could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime from

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787984: brickos: please make the build reproducible

Source: brickos Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-10 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that brickos could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $dateti

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787992: fflas-ffpack: please make the build reproducible Source:

Source: fflas-ffpack Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fflas-ffpack could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788010: givaro: please make the build reproducible

Source: givaro Version: 3.7.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that givaro could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HT

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788012: geis: please make the build reproducible

Source: geis Version: 2.2.16-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that geis could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788336: irrlicht: please make the build reproducible Source: irrlicht

Source: irrlicht Version: 1.8.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that irrlicht could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $date

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788344: hamlib: please make the build reproducible

Source: hamlib Version: 1.2.15.3-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that hamlib could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime fr

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788737: libgpiv: please make the build reproducible

Source: libgpiv Version: 0.6.1-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libgpiv could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime f

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788757: jacktrip: please make the build reproducible

Source: jacktrip Version: 1.0.5.patch2-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Version: 1.0.5.patch2-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that jacktrip could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788868: apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Source: apophenia Version: 0.999b+ds3-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that apophenia could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $dat

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788920: orthanc: please make the build reproducible

Source: orthanc Version: 0.8.4+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that orthanc could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the valu

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788955: rivet: please make the build reproducible

Source: rivet Version: 1.8.3-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that rivet could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HT

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789040: liblo: please make the build reproducible

Source: liblo Version: 0.28-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that liblo could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789049: mpqc: please make the build reproducible

Source: mpqc Version: 2.3.1-16 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that mpqc could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime from the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789071: libxkbcommon: please make the build reproducible

Source: libxkbcommon Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libxkbcommon could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789073: libxr: please make the build reproducible

Source: libxr Version: 1.0-2.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libxr could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime from th

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789076: lvtk: please make the build reproducible

Source: lvtk Version: 1.2.0~dfsg0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that lvtk could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789087: lmdb: please make the build reproducible

Source: lmdb Version: 0.9.14-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that lmdb could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the HTML_TIME

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789184: openigtlink: please make the build reproducible

Source: openigtlink Version: 1.10.5-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that openigtlink could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $da

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789264: openscenegraph: please make the build reproducible

Source: openscenegraph Version: 3.2.1-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that openscenegraph could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwri

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789396: libsidplayfp: please make the build reproducible

Source: libsidplayfp Version: 1.7.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libsidplayfp could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789399: psocksxx: please make the build reproducible

Source: psocksxx Version: 0.0.6-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that psocksxx could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value o

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789405: qdjango: please make the build reproducible

Source: qdjango Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that qdjango could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789406: qof: please make the build reproducible

Source: qof Version: 0.8.8-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that qof could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_TIM

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789428: qsapecng: please make the build reproducible

Source: qsapecng Version: 2.0.0-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that qsapecng could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the HTML

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789715: simgrid: please make the build reproducible

Source: simgrid Version: 3.11.1-9 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that simgrid could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789843: tex4ht: please consider not printing timestamps in html output by default

Source: tex4ht Version: 20090611-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain Hello, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that the packages freecol, libgfshare, dbus-java, logol, and polybori could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790010: simbody: please make the build reproducible

Source: simbody Version: 3.5.1+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that simbody could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the valu

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790023: stx-btree: please make the build reproducible

Source: stx-btree Version: 0.9-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that stx-btree could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the HT

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790034: siscone: please make the build reproducible

Source: siscone Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that siscone could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $datetime fro

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790035: thepeg: please make the build reproducible

Source: thepeg Version: 1.8.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that thepeg could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HT

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790074: visp: please make the build reproducible

Source: visp Version: 2.10.0-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that visp could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790081: wfmath: please make the build reproducible

Source: wfmath Version: 1.0.2+dfsg1-0.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that wfmath could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the val

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790082: wreport: please make the build reproducible

Source: wreport Version: 2.14-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that wreport could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of H

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790122: clblas: please make the build reproducible

Source: clblas Version: 2.4-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that clblas could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the HTML_TIMES

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790133: dcmtk: please make the build reproducible

Source: dcmtk Version: 3.6.0-15 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dcmtk could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTM

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790139: glfw3: please make the build reproducible

Source: glfw3 Version: 3.0.4-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that glfw3 could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790228: gtkspellmm: please make the build reproducible

Source: gtkspellmm Version: 3.0.3+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that gtkspellmm could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes th

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790868: sbuild: Please allow sbuild to use a deterministic build path to build packages

Source: sbuild Version: 0.65.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain buildpath Hi, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that sbuild by default uses random build directories to build packages. This m

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#790868: sbuild: Please allow sbuild to use a deterministic build path to build packages

Hi, On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:06:28 +0200 =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly6W15?= Bobbio wrote: > How about using a safeguard here instead of warning users? I'd rather > not have to answer “it was written” to very angry users who just have > lost their home directory… > > Maybe fail when the build path that

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 6: Move forward reproducible builds

Hello, This week I have been working on two toolchain packages. One of them is sbuild which I have patched such that it can build packages using a deterministic build path through a the new command line option --build-path or through the configuration variable $build_path in the ~/.sbuilrc. - Pa

[Reproducible-builds] Please make the CreationDate, ModDate and ID field deterministic

Hello, I wanted to expand on the thread started by Nicolas Boulenguez: http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/pdftex/2015-May/008940.html Where they explain ways to make pdftex produce reproducible output. I propose the attached patch which does not change the default behaviour of pdftex but if the envir

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [pdftex] Please make the CreationDate, ModDate and ID field deterministic

Hi, On 07/12/2015 12:02 AM, Karl Berry wrote: > > Meanwhile, Thanh has already made changes in the pdftex source > repository, revision 724 at > https://foundry.supelec.fr/scm/viewvc.php/branches/stable/source/?root=pdftex > (project page: https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/pdftex/) > > I appen

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792201: doxygen: Honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable for reproducible output

Source: doxygen Version: 1.8.9.1-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain timestamps Control: block -1 by 791823 Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751984 Hi, this bug is to track the progress of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792202: texlive-bin: Please make the CreationDate, ModDate and ID field deterministic

Source: texlive-bin Version: 2015.20150524.37493-5.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain timestamps Control: block -1 by 791823 Control: forwarded -1 http://tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2015-July/008952.html Hi, this bug is to

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 7: Move forward reproducible builds

Hello, This week I was working to make the toolchain package texlive-bin produce reproducible PDF files. A patch was submitted to the responsible upstream, pdftex, and is currently being discussed. Upstream patch: http://tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2015-July/008952.html The patch honours the enviro

[Reproducible-builds] authbind : please make the build reproducible

Source: authbind Version: 3.0.3.5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that authbind could not be b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792945: authbind : please make the build reproducible

Source: authbind Version: 3.0.3.5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that authbind could not be b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792947: cvs-mailcommit: please make the build reproducible

Source: cvs-mailcommit Version: 1.19-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that cvs-mailcommit co

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792949: chimera2: please make the build reproducible

Source: chimera2 Version: 2.0a19-8 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that chimera2 could not be

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792955: dput: please make the build reproducible

Source: dput Version: 0.9.6.4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dput could not be built rep

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792953: dhcping: please make the build reproducible

Source: dhcping Version: 1.2-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dhcping could not be bui

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792954: dpatch: please make the build reproducible

Source: dpatch Version: 2.0.35 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dpatch could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792950: ccze: please make the build reproducible

Source: ccze Version: 0.2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that ccze could not be built rep

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792952: dhcpdump : please make the build reproducible

Source: dhcpdump Version: 1.8-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dhcpdump could not be bui

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792951: dbview: please make the build reproducible

Source: dbview Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dbview could not be buil

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792958: dtaus: please make the build reproducible

Source: dtaus Version: 0.9-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that dtaus could not be built rep

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792959: elida: please make the build reproducible

Source: elida Version: 0.4+nmu1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that elida could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792961: enemies-of-carlotta: please make the build reproducible

Source: enemies-of-carlotta Version: 1.2.6-4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that enemies-of-c

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792963: erc: please make the build reproducible

Source: erc Version: 5.3-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that erc could not be built reprodu

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792967: fgetty: please make the build reproducible

Source: fgetty Version: 0.6-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fgetty could not be built r

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792965: fastforward: please make the build reproducible

Source: fastforward Version: 1:0.51-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fastforward could n

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792970: fortunes-bg: please make the build reproducible

Source: fortunes-bg Version: 1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fortunes-bg could not be

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792971: junior-doc: please make the build reproducible

Source: junior-doc Version: 1.16.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that junior-doc could not b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792969: flowscan: please make the build reproducible

Source: flowscan Version: 1.006-13.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that flowscan could not b

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792972: libjama: please make the build reproducible

Source: libjama Version: 1.2.4-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libjama could not be bui

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792977: luakit: please make the build reproducible

Source: luakit Version: 2012.09.13-r1-4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that luakit could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792976: logapp: please make the build reproducible

Source: logapp Version: 0.15-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that logapp could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792974: liblockfile: please make the build reproducible

Source: liblockfile Version: 1.09-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that liblockfile could not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792973: liblip: please make the build reproducible

Source: liblip Version: 2.0.0-1.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that liblip could not be bui

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792975: libmsv: please make the build reproducible

Source: libmsv Version: 1.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libmsv could not be built r

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792978: nec: please make the build reproducible

Source: nec Version: 2-16 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that nec could not be built reproduc

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792979: runit: please make the build reproducible

Source: runit Version: 2.1.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that runit could not be built r

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792980: tworld: please make the build reproducible

Source: tworld Version: 1.3.0-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that tworld could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792982: ftpcopy: please make the build reproducible

Source: ftpcopy Version: 0.6.7-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that ftpcopy could not be bui

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792981: wmweather: please make the build reproducible

Source: wmweather Version: 2.4.5-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that wmweather could not be

  1   2   >