Re: strip-nd FTBFS in reproducible infra

2016-09-11 Thread Chris Lamb
> The problem is TZ != "UTC". Good spot. I didn't see a bug for this, so filed in the BTS. Let's move any further discussion--if necessary--to there. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Re: strip-nd FTBFS in reproducible infra

2016-09-10 Thread HW42
Chris Lamb: >> Then I'd have expected it to fail also in the buildds... > > Oh, it *doesn't* fail in the buildds? Weird. > > Still, given that it's *this* particular test that fails it's almost > certainly something along the lines I previously suggested (this test > is deliberately designed to

Re: strip-nd FTBFS in reproducible infra

2016-09-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 05:08:13PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > My gut tells me it's using the older, "system-wide" strip-nondeterminism > libraries for the tests instead of version in the build directory, ie. > the tests would pass under 0.026 but as it's using 0.025 they fail. Then I'd have

Re: strip-nd FTBFS in reproducible infra

2016-09-10 Thread Chris Lamb
> Could somebody have a look? My gut tells me it's using the older, "system-wide" strip-nondeterminism libraries for the tests instead of version in the build directory, ie. the tests would pass under 0.026 but as it's using 0.025 they fail. (I can't think why it would do this given that it does